[問題] 抵制不該殃及無辜論?
看板PublicIssue作者neverlight ((╴︵╴).z.Z)時間11年前 (2014/10/14 12:50)推噓11(12推 1噓 24→)留言37則, 19人參與討論串1/9 (看更多)
最近抵制頂新話題沸沸揚揚
連官銀都放話抽銀根
這時和人談論就聽到一個說法
認為抵制會造成底下員工失業造成動亂
例如林鳳營不是油卻被一起抵制
還有台灣之星也是
掃到颱風尾
我的說法是大眾已經沒有信心
合理懷疑相關產品只是未出包
因此預防性抵制也是很合理的
結果對方就說這是民粹不理性
他的想法是老闆該受罰 但員工不該受牽連
這有可能嗎==?
--
Sent from my Android
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 223.139.221.198
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/PublicIssue/M.1413262208.A.6AA.html
推
10/14 12:57, , 1F
10/14 12:57, 1F
→
10/14 12:59, , 2F
10/14 12:59, 2F
→
10/14 13:11, , 3F
10/14 13:11, 3F
→
10/14 13:11, , 4F
10/14 13:11, 4F
→
10/14 13:13, , 5F
10/14 13:13, 5F
→
10/14 13:13, , 6F
10/14 13:13, 6F
→
10/14 13:14, , 7F
10/14 13:14, 7F
推
10/14 13:15, , 8F
10/14 13:15, 8F
推
10/14 13:27, , 9F
10/14 13:27, 9F
→
10/14 13:28, , 10F
10/14 13:28, 10F
→
10/14 13:29, , 11F
10/14 13:29, 11F
→
10/14 13:30, , 12F
10/14 13:30, 12F
推
10/14 13:34, , 13F
10/14 13:34, 13F
→
10/14 13:34, , 14F
10/14 13:34, 14F
推
10/14 13:48, , 15F
10/14 13:48, 15F
推
10/14 13:52, , 16F
10/14 13:52, 16F
→
10/14 13:56, , 17F
10/14 13:56, 17F
推
10/14 14:18, , 18F
10/14 14:18, 18F
→
10/14 14:19, , 19F
10/14 14:19, 19F
→
10/14 14:21, , 20F
10/14 14:21, 20F
→
10/14 14:21, , 21F
10/14 14:21, 21F
→
10/14 14:28, , 22F
10/14 14:28, 22F
→
10/14 14:29, , 23F
10/14 14:29, 23F
推
10/14 14:32, , 24F
10/14 14:32, 24F
推
10/14 14:46, , 25F
10/14 14:46, 25F
推
10/14 14:53, , 26F
10/14 14:53, 26F
→
10/14 14:53, , 27F
10/14 14:53, 27F
→
10/14 14:53, , 28F
10/14 14:53, 28F
推
10/14 15:50, , 29F
10/14 15:50, 29F
→
10/14 15:51, , 30F
10/14 15:51, 30F
→
10/14 16:41, , 31F
10/14 16:41, 31F
推
10/14 18:37, , 32F
10/14 18:37, 32F
噓
10/14 18:37, , 33F
10/14 18:37, 33F
→
10/14 23:58, , 34F
10/14 23:58, 34F
→
08/12 04:22, , 35F
08/12 04:22, 35F
→
09/13 19:43, , 36F
09/13 19:43, 36F
→
12/29 02:25,
7年前
, 37F
12/29 02:25, 37F
討論串 (同標題文章)