Fw: [新聞] 「劣油未必傷身」食藥署挨批護航
※ [本文轉錄自 Gossiping 看板 #1K2jgraC ]
作者: LeftLiberist (鍵盤鄉民) 看板: Gossiping
標題: [新聞] 「劣油未必傷身」食藥署挨批護航
時間: Sat Sep 6 17:58:08 2014
1.媒體來源:
蘋果
2.完整新聞標題/內文:
「劣油未必傷身」食藥署挨批護航
餿水油駭全台,食品藥物管理署長葉明功昨表示,該署昨已收到從強
冠儲油槽取得香豬油等樣本,將檢驗其中對人體危害較大的重金屬(
鉛、鎘、汞、銅、錫)、黃麴毒素、苯比、酸價等,結果最快後天出
爐。但食藥署昨指誤食這些劣質油未必傷身,此事仍屬健康風險燈號
最低的「綠燈」,遭網友痛批為業者護航,是「食糞署」。
風險燈號維持綠燈
食藥署昨召開專家會議,葉明功會後表示,專家初步認為此案屬詐欺
,油品健康風險雖未確認,但一定要追究業者責任。
而為了降低民眾恐慌,食藥署昨避用「餿水油」三個字,將問題油定
位為「劣質豬油」,葉明功說,強冠是把回收油、餿水油經再製後的
油品,以1:2的比例與真正豬油調合,且餿水油少、回收油多,應視
為劣質豬油。
葉明功說,現無足夠證據顯示,誤食這批劣質油會傷害人體,依該署
的健康風險燈號分級,現應為風險最低的綠燈。健康風險燈號分紅、
黃、藍、綠四級,紅燈風險最高,綠燈風險最低。
但葉明功此說法引發網友痛批,砲轟食藥署為業者護航,應改稱「食
糞署」。台灣食品科學技術學會前秘書長許輔也說,依這邏輯,台灣
食安永遠都是綠燈,如此又怎能提醒國人?食藥署應重新評估風險燈
號的適用性。
◎記者邱俊吉
3.新聞連結:
http://goo.gl/vqaLge
4.備註:
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 123.202.81.45
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1409997493.A.90C.html
推
09/06 17:58, , 1F
09/06 17:58, 1F
推
09/06 17:58, , 2F
09/06 17:58, 2F
→
09/06 17:58, , 3F
09/06 17:58, 3F
噓
09/06 17:58, , 4F
09/06 17:58, 4F
→
09/06 17:59, , 5F
09/06 17:59, 5F
噓
09/06 17:59, , 6F
09/06 17:59, 6F
→
09/06 17:59, , 7F
09/06 17:59, 7F
→
09/06 17:59, , 8F
09/06 17:59, 8F
→
09/06 18:00, , 9F
09/06 18:00, 9F
→
09/06 18:00, , 10F
09/06 18:00, 10F
→
09/06 18:00, , 11F
09/06 18:00, 11F
推
09/06 18:00, , 12F
09/06 18:00, 12F
推
09/06 18:00, , 13F
09/06 18:00, 13F
→
09/06 18:00, , 14F
09/06 18:00, 14F
→
09/06 18:00, , 15F
09/06 18:00, 15F
推
09/06 18:01, , 16F
09/06 18:01, 16F
噓
09/06 18:01, , 17F
09/06 18:01, 17F
推
09/06 18:02, , 18F
09/06 18:02, 18F
噓
09/06 18:02, , 19F
09/06 18:02, 19F
→
09/06 18:03, , 20F
09/06 18:03, 20F
→
09/06 18:03, , 21F
09/06 18:03, 21F
推
09/06 18:04, , 22F
09/06 18:04, 22F
推
09/06 18:05, , 23F
09/06 18:05, 23F
推
09/06 18:05, , 24F
09/06 18:05, 24F
→
09/06 18:06, , 25F
09/06 18:06, 25F
噓
09/06 18:08, , 26F
09/06 18:08, 26F
→
09/06 18:08, , 27F
09/06 18:08, 27F
推
09/06 18:08, , 28F
09/06 18:08, 28F
→
09/06 18:08, , 29F
09/06 18:08, 29F
→
09/06 18:11, , 30F
09/06 18:11, 30F
推
09/06 18:12, , 31F
09/06 18:12, 31F
噓
09/06 18:15, , 32F
09/06 18:15, 32F
推
09/06 18:15, , 33F
09/06 18:15, 33F
→
09/06 18:16, , 34F
09/06 18:16, 34F
→
09/06 18:17, , 35F
09/06 18:17, 35F
→
09/06 18:17, , 36F
09/06 18:17, 36F
噓
09/06 18:19, , 37F
09/06 18:19, 37F
推
09/06 18:19, , 38F
09/06 18:19, 38F
噓
09/06 18:32, , 39F
09/06 18:32, 39F
→
09/06 18:32, , 40F
09/06 18:32, 40F
噓
09/06 18:34, , 41F
09/06 18:34, 41F
推
09/06 18:49, , 42F
09/06 18:49, 42F
噓
09/06 18:51, , 43F
09/06 18:51, 43F
推
09/06 18:56, , 44F
09/06 18:56, 44F
→
09/06 18:56, , 45F
09/06 18:56, 45F
噓
09/06 19:40, , 46F
09/06 19:40, 46F
→
09/06 20:13, , 47F
09/06 20:13, 47F
噓
09/06 20:19, , 48F
09/06 20:19, 48F
推
09/06 20:34, , 49F
09/06 20:34, 49F
噓
09/06 21:45, , 50F
09/06 21:45, 50F
噓
09/06 23:13, , 51F
09/06 23:13, 51F
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
※ 轉錄者: LeftLiberist (123.202.81.45), 09/07/2014 18:11:53
→
09/07 18:18, , 52F
09/07 18:18, 52F
→
09/07 18:21, , 53F
09/07 18:21, 53F
→
09/07 18:44, , 54F
09/07 18:44, 54F
→
09/07 18:49, , 55F
09/07 18:49, 55F
→
09/07 18:52, , 56F
09/07 18:52, 56F
→
09/07 18:53, , 57F
09/07 18:53, 57F
→
09/07 19:46, , 58F
09/07 19:46, 58F
→
09/08 04:45, , 59F
09/08 04:45, 59F
→
08/12 03:50, , 60F
08/12 03:50, 60F
→
09/13 19:14, , 61F
09/13 19:14, 61F
→
11/04 11:21, , 62F
11/04 11:21, 62F
→
11/04 11:21, , 63F
11/04 11:21, 63F
→
12/29 02:03,
5年前
, 64F
12/29 02:03, 64F