[問題] 有無水丁鄂貓實驗違反先驗性的原因?

看板Physics作者 (真冷的冬天)時間8年前 (2017/07/29 09:06), 編輯推噓1(106)
留言7則, 4人參與, 最新討論串1/1
先上個先驗性定義 A priori knowledge or justification is independent of experience, as with mathematics (3 + 2 = 5), tautologies ("All bachelors are unmarried"), and deduction from pure reason (e.g., ontological proofs).[3] 後驗性定義 A posteriori knowledge or justification is dependent on experience or empirical evidence, as with most aspects of science and personal knowledge. 請問各位大大們 水丁鄂 幻想貓實驗 哪邊違反了先驗性的定義,而可以推知,其為後驗性呢? -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.238.82.212 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Physics/M.1501290411.A.FF2.html

07/29 10:18, , 1F
水丁鄂 這翻譯還真奇怪 我們應先明確一點 薛丁格的貓是講
07/29 10:18, 1F

07/29 10:18, , 2F
量子態的疊加 而不是講觀測
07/29 10:18, 2F

07/29 12:42, , 3F
先驗性 = 先射箭規定 再畫靶
07/29 12:42, 3F

07/29 18:55, , 4F
big bang cosmology quantum mechanics
07/29 18:55, 4F

07/30 07:51, , 5F
你這個問題簡直堪稱不知所云,你有試著讀懂你貼的這
07/30 07:51, 5F

07/30 07:51, , 6F
兩段定義還有搞懂不確定性原理嗎
07/30 07:51, 6F

07/30 08:05, , 7F
*薛丁格的貓 讀這篇讀到頭都昏了想A打B
07/30 08:05, 7F
文章代碼(AID): #1PUz-h_o (Physics)