[新聞] 中微子實驗忘記GPS誤差
Don't fire up your spaceship's FTL drive just yet, folks. Those neutrinos
that CERN scientists thought they saw traveling faster than the speed of
light a few weeks ago look like they may have only been moving at close to
light speed.
Last month, a team of international researchers shocked the scientific world
with the news that particles they had been firing for several years from the
CERN particle accelerator in Switzerland at detectors at the OPERA facility
in Gran Sasso, Italy placed about 450 miles away appeared to be arriving at
their destination faster than the time it would take light to get there.
The particles, traveling through air, water, and rock, shouldn't have hit the
Gran Sasso detectors sooner than about 2.4 thousandths of a second after
being fired, which is the time it would take light to travel the distance
between the two points. Yet the CERN researchers reported that their
neutrinos were getting to the target 64 nanoseconds faster—meaning that they
were traveling faster than light, supposedly impossible according to the
Theory of Special Relativity.
Now other scientists say that a failure to fully account for the effects of
relativity is what caused the original researchers to supposedly mis-measure
the time it was taking the neutrinos to travel using a GPS satellite, despite
the CERN team saying they had factored relativity into their calculations.
A new paper by Dutch researcher Ronald A.J. van Elburg lays out the case that
the GPS satellite measuring the neutrinos' movements was also moving relative
to the CERN and OPERA facilities as it orbited the Earth. Briefly, van Elburg
asserts that the effects of relativity as they pertain to the GPS satellite's
measurements require two corrections to the perceived time of travel.
Lo and behold, it turns out that applying that double correction shaves 64
nanoseconds off the neutrinos' travel time, according to van Elburg, "[t]hus
bringing the apparent velocities of neutrinos back to a value not
significantly different from the speed of light."
It's too early to say whether that's the final verdict on this story—the
CERN scientists did claim to have accounted for such factors in their report.
But for now, it appears that making the jump to hyperspace may be just as far
off as it was before some seemingly super-fast neutrinos got us all excited
about being Han Solo.
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2394747,00.asp#fbid=Txpjiai5wg_
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.41.219.117
→
10/17 21:09, , 1F
10/17 21:09, 1F
推
10/17 21:23, , 2F
10/17 21:23, 2F
推
10/17 21:28, , 3F
10/17 21:28, 3F
→
10/17 21:30, , 4F
10/17 21:30, 4F
→
10/17 21:30, , 5F
10/17 21:30, 5F
推
10/17 21:31, , 6F
10/17 21:31, 6F
推
10/17 21:52, , 7F
10/17 21:52, 7F
推
10/17 22:17, , 8F
10/17 22:17, 8F
推
10/17 22:20, , 9F
10/17 22:20, 9F
推
10/17 22:24, , 10F
10/17 22:24, 10F
推
10/17 22:44, , 11F
10/17 22:44, 11F
推
10/17 22:45, , 12F
10/17 22:45, 12F
推
10/17 22:49, , 13F
10/17 22:49, 13F
推
10/17 22:51, , 14F
10/17 22:51, 14F
推
10/17 22:52, , 15F
10/17 22:52, 15F
推
10/17 23:12, , 16F
10/17 23:12, 16F
推
10/17 23:14, , 17F
10/17 23:14, 17F
→
10/17 23:14, , 18F
10/17 23:14, 18F
推
10/17 23:21, , 19F
10/17 23:21, 19F
推
10/17 23:24, , 20F
10/17 23:24, 20F
推
10/17 23:26, , 21F
10/17 23:26, 21F
→
10/17 23:26, , 22F
10/17 23:26, 22F
→
10/17 23:27, , 23F
10/17 23:27, 23F
推
10/18 01:06, , 24F
10/18 01:06, 24F
→
10/18 02:08, , 25F
10/18 02:08, 25F
→
10/18 02:09, , 26F
10/18 02:09, 26F
推
10/18 07:57, , 27F
10/18 07:57, 27F
→
10/18 08:47, , 28F
10/18 08:47, 28F
推
10/18 09:05, , 29F
10/18 09:05, 29F
推
10/18 11:33, , 30F
10/18 11:33, 30F
推
10/18 15:42, , 31F
10/18 15:42, 31F
推
10/18 20:57, , 32F
10/18 20:57, 32F
推
10/18 22:16, , 33F
10/18 22:16, 33F
→
10/18 22:17, , 34F
10/18 22:17, 34F
→
10/18 22:18, , 35F
10/18 22:18, 35F
推
10/19 02:03, , 36F
10/19 02:03, 36F
→
10/19 02:03, , 37F
10/19 02:03, 37F
推
10/20 12:47, , 38F
10/20 12:47, 38F
→
08/13 16:28, , 39F
08/13 16:28, 39F
→
09/17 14:27, , 40F
09/17 14:27, 40F