Re: [好奇] 觀察者的情緒可以算是維度嗎?
看板Physics作者meblessme (眾生之心皆我道場)時間14年前 (2011/03/22 23:41)推噓-16(0推 16噓 86→)留言102則, 21人參與討論串11/17 (看更多)
※ 引述《Landau (Lev)》之銘言:
: ※ 引述《meblessme (眾生之心皆我道場)》之銘言:
在這個討論串裡我最不滿的,
其實是沒有一個人真正的提出:
什麼樣的定義才是符合這個板所需要的正確的維度的定義!
有的人說要有數學語言,
有的說不符合這個學者、那本書的定義,
上面這些跟維度定義有什麼直接關係,
你們在乎的維度定義,到底是一種權威、一種形式,還是維度本身?
那麼,符合你們對於維度的定義的標準在哪裡呢?
: : 說真的,我不知道該怎麼辦耶!
: : 我是在研究一個唯心跟唯物的統合理論。
: : 這樣的理論包含還蠻廣的,
: : 佛學、道家、腦神經生理、哲學、物理、天文學。
: : 可是每種學問都有專用語言,
: : 也都有歷史權威性
: : 所以不管到哪個專板,
: : 答案都是
: : 1,你先學會我們用的語言再說。
: : 2,你的理論跟現有理論不相同,所以必然被剃掉!
: : 3、其它領域的東西不能隨便拿來套用!
: : 不過我大概沒有那麼多時間學會每一個領域的專業,
: : 而且我也希望那是個每個領域人士都能看懂的理論。
: : 所以專業的部份就只能來請教各領域的專業人士了!
: 我不是很清楚你的研究目標是什麼,
: 不過我覺得你應該先搞清楚自己的目標跟哪個領域比較相關,
: 然後去學學那個領域的東西。
: 我覺得做學問從來都是腳踏實地,
: 專業的部份即使你請教專業人士,
: 他也不可能馬上講到你懂,
: 學問是需要累積的。
: 如果你學過一些物理的話,
: 你就知道為什麼版友對你的問題會有這種反應了。
--
我原本以為我是個人,但卻發現我只是宇宙中的一片葉子,
後來,發現自己其實也是宇宙樹本身;
其實,也是樹幹,也是樹枝,也是每一片葉子;
也是每一個分子原子夸克…。
直到,其實也根本不是宇宙樹的任何一部份。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 211.79.38.197
→
03/22 23:44, , 1F
03/22 23:44, 1F
→
03/22 23:51, , 2F
03/22 23:51, 2F
→
03/22 23:51, , 3F
03/22 23:51, 3F
→
03/22 23:55, , 4F
03/22 23:55, 4F
→
03/22 23:55, , 5F
03/22 23:55, 5F
→
03/22 23:56, , 6F
03/22 23:56, 6F
噓
03/22 23:57, , 7F
03/22 23:57, 7F
→
03/22 23:57, , 8F
03/22 23:57, 8F
→
03/22 23:57, , 9F
03/22 23:57, 9F
→
03/22 23:57, , 10F
03/22 23:57, 10F
→
03/22 23:58, , 11F
03/22 23:58, 11F
→
03/22 23:59, , 12F
03/22 23:59, 12F
→
03/23 00:02, , 13F
03/23 00:02, 13F
噓
03/23 00:03, , 14F
03/23 00:03, 14F
→
03/23 00:03, , 15F
03/23 00:03, 15F
→
03/23 00:04, , 16F
03/23 00:04, 16F
→
03/23 00:04, , 17F
03/23 00:04, 17F
→
03/23 00:05, , 18F
03/23 00:05, 18F
→
03/23 00:06, , 19F
03/23 00:06, 19F
→
03/23 00:06, , 20F
03/23 00:06, 20F
→
03/23 00:08, , 21F
03/23 00:08, 21F
→
03/23 00:09, , 22F
03/23 00:09, 22F
→
03/23 00:10, , 23F
03/23 00:10, 23F
→
03/23 00:10, , 24F
03/23 00:10, 24F
→
03/23 00:12, , 25F
03/23 00:12, 25F
→
03/23 00:13, , 26F
03/23 00:13, 26F
噓
03/23 00:33, , 27F
03/23 00:33, 27F
噓
03/23 00:35, , 28F
03/23 00:35, 28F
→
03/23 00:35, , 29F
03/23 00:35, 29F
噓
03/23 00:39, , 30F
03/23 00:39, 30F
噓
03/23 00:49, , 31F
03/23 00:49, 31F
→
03/23 00:51, , 32F
03/23 00:51, 32F
→
03/23 00:52, , 33F
03/23 00:52, 33F
→
03/23 00:53, , 34F
03/23 00:53, 34F
→
03/23 00:54, , 35F
03/23 00:54, 35F
→
03/23 00:55, , 36F
03/23 00:55, 36F
→
03/23 00:56, , 37F
03/23 00:56, 37F
噓
03/23 01:06, , 38F
03/23 01:06, 38F
噓
03/23 01:26, , 39F
03/23 01:26, 39F
還有 23 則推文
→
03/23 20:16, , 63F
03/23 20:16, 63F
→
03/23 20:16, , 64F
03/23 20:16, 64F
→
03/23 20:16, , 65F
03/23 20:16, 65F
→
03/23 20:16, , 66F
03/23 20:16, 66F
→
03/23 20:16, , 67F
03/23 20:16, 67F
→
03/23 20:16, , 68F
03/23 20:16, 68F
→
03/23 20:16, , 69F
03/23 20:16, 69F
→
03/23 20:16, , 70F
03/23 20:16, 70F
→
03/23 20:16, , 71F
03/23 20:16, 71F
→
03/23 20:16, , 72F
03/23 20:16, 72F
→
03/23 20:16, , 73F
03/23 20:16, 73F
→
03/23 20:16, , 74F
03/23 20:16, 74F
→
03/23 20:16, , 75F
03/23 20:16, 75F
→
03/23 20:16, , 76F
03/23 20:16, 76F
→
03/23 20:16, , 77F
03/23 20:16, 77F
→
03/23 20:16, , 78F
03/23 20:16, 78F
→
03/23 20:16, , 79F
03/23 20:16, 79F
→
03/23 20:16, , 80F
03/23 20:16, 80F
→
03/23 20:16, , 81F
03/23 20:16, 81F
→
03/23 20:16, , 82F
03/23 20:16, 82F
→
03/23 20:16, , 83F
03/23 20:16, 83F
→
03/23 20:16, , 84F
03/23 20:16, 84F
→
03/23 20:16, , 85F
03/23 20:16, 85F
→
03/23 20:16, , 86F
03/23 20:16, 86F
→
03/23 20:16, , 87F
03/23 20:16, 87F
→
03/23 20:16, , 88F
03/23 20:16, 88F
→
03/23 20:16, , 89F
03/23 20:16, 89F
→
03/23 20:16, , 90F
03/23 20:16, 90F
→
03/23 20:16, , 91F
03/23 20:16, 91F
→
03/23 20:16, , 92F
03/23 20:16, 92F
→
03/23 20:16, , 93F
03/23 20:16, 93F
→
03/23 20:16, , 94F
03/23 20:16, 94F
→
03/23 20:16, , 95F
03/23 20:16, 95F
→
03/23 20:16, , 96F
03/23 20:16, 96F
→
03/23 20:16, , 97F
03/23 20:16, 97F
噓
03/23 20:54, , 98F
03/23 20:54, 98F
→
03/23 22:46, , 99F
03/23 22:46, 99F
→
03/24 23:30, , 100F
03/24 23:30, 100F
→
08/13 16:08, , 101F
08/13 16:08, 101F
→
09/17 14:08, , 102F
09/17 14:08, 102F
討論串 (同標題文章)