[新聞] 'Overwhelming' evidence for monopoles
'Overwhelming' evidence for monopoles
Multiple experiments reveal materials with single points of
north and south
http://www.nature.com/news/2009/090903/full/news.2009.881.html
One of those facts of life that physicists live with is that every magnet
ever made has a north and a south pole. When researchers try to split the
two, they simply get another magnet with poles of its own. There's no reason
that should be the case, and for decades they have been on the hunt for a
single pole, or monopole.
"People have been looking for monopoles in cosmic rays and particle
accelerators — even Moon rocks," says Jonathan Morris, a researcher at the
Helmholtz Centre for Materials and Energy in Berlin.
Now Morris and others have found the strongest evidence yet for magnetic
monopoles, in small crystals about the size of an ear plug. When the crystals
are chilled to near absolute zero, they seem to fill with tiny single points
of north and south. The points are less than a nanometre apart, and cannot be
measured directly. Nevertheless, Morris and other physicists believe they are
there. They make their case in two papers published today in the journal
Science1,2, and other work published on the pre-print server arXiv.org3,4.
The crystals are made of materials known as 'spin ice', because their atoms
are arranged in a way similar to those in water ice. Specifically, its atoms
sit at the vertices of four-sided pyramids. Each atom behaves like a tiny bar
magnet, and when the crystal is cooled to near absolute zero, the
atom-magnets align. Sometimes, three of the pyramid's four corners align
together and create a region of north or south magnetic charge at the centre
of the pyramid. The charge isn't attached to any physical object, but it
behaves just as a monopole would.
Unquestionable evidence?
Theoretical work had shown that monopoles probably exist, and they have been
measured indirectly. But the Science papers are the first direct experiments
to record the monopole's effects on the spin-ice material. The papers use
neutrons to detect atoms in the crystal aligned into long daisy chains1,2.
These daisy chains tie each north and south monopole together. Known as
'Dirac strings', the chains, as well as the existence of monopoles, were
predicted in the 1930s by the British theoretical physicist Paul Dirac. Heat
measurements in one paper1 also support the monopole argument.
The two, as yet unpublished, papers on arXiv add to the evidence. The first
provides additional observations3, and the second uses a new technique to
determine the magnetic charge of each monopole to be 4.6x10-13 joules per
tesla metre4. All together, the evidence for magnetic monopoles "is now
overwhelming", says Steve Bramwell, a materials scientist at University
College London and author on one of the Science papers2 and one of the arXiv
papers4.
"This sort of measurement makes monopoles more substantial, at least in my
mind," says Peter Schiffer, a researcher at Pennsylvania State University in
University Park. Whether the monopoles will be seen directly is another
question, says Schiffer. Like any charged particle, opposites attract, and
the north and south poles typically cluster together less than a nanometre
from each other. That makes them extremely hard to detect individually. But,
Schiffer says, "I'm very hesitant to say that anything is impossible."
Even without directly seeing one, Bramwell says that he is certain that the
monopoles are there. "I don't think anybody could question it after this
flurry of papers," he says.
References
1.Morris, J. et al. Science advanced online publication
doi:10.1126/science.1178868 (2009).
2.Fennell, T. et al. Science advance online publication
doi:10.1126/science.1177582 (2009).
3.Kadowaki, H. et al. preprint at http://arXiv.org/abs/0908.3568v2 (2009).
4. Bramwell, S. T. et al. preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/0907.0956 (2009).
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.112.102.68
推
09/09 13:44, , 1F
09/09 13:44, 1F
→
09/09 16:11, , 2F
09/09 16:11, 2F
→
09/09 21:42, , 3F
09/09 21:42, 3F
推
09/09 22:29, , 4F
09/09 22:29, 4F
→
09/09 23:48, , 5F
09/09 23:48, 5F