[問題] 投期刊被Reject，還適合重投嗎?
各位先進好，
小弟在今年年初投一篇paper到IEEE-TMTT 在昨天收到Editor的審查結果是Reject，
其中Associate Editor的意見如下:
Thank you for your submission to TMTT. Our reviewer board completed a
detailed review of your paper. Unfortunately, our reviewer board did
not find your paper suitable for publication. We look forward to your
future submissions to TMTT.
而Reviewer總共有兩位，意見相當不同，其中第一位Reviewer很負面，認為電路無
創新，第二位Reviewer則覺得內容很有趣，並提供一些改善論文的方向，以下為這
兩個Reviewer之審查意見大要:
Reviewer: 1
* The paper is not well written, even if the authors state that the paper has
been handled by a native English speaker
Reviewer: 2
* The topic is interesting and the proposed model is in reasonably good
agreement with simulation/experimental results.
Reviewer1的意見很負面，可能是Introduction沒有寫好，導致其新穎處沒有被突顯出來
，這部分可以再翻修，另外若按照Reviewer2的意見，補充一些新的分析內容，是否還有
機會再重投呢?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 140.96.194.100
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/PhD/M.1403062200.A.83E.html
推
06/18 12:20, , 1F
06/18 12:20, 1F
→
06/18 12:21, , 2F
06/18 12:21, 2F
→
06/18 12:22, , 3F
06/18 12:22, 3F
→
06/18 12:22, , 4F
06/18 12:22, 4F
推
06/18 12:42, , 5F
06/18 12:42, 5F
→
06/18 12:42, , 6F
06/18 12:42, 6F
→
06/18 12:42, , 7F
06/18 12:42, 7F
推
06/18 13:11, , 8F
06/18 13:11, 8F
→
06/18 13:20, , 9F
06/18 13:20, 9F
推
06/19 00:44, , 10F
06/19 00:44, 10F
推
06/19 11:27, , 11F
06/19 11:27, 11F
→
06/19 11:28, , 12F
06/19 11:28, 12F
→
06/19 11:28, , 13F
06/19 11:28, 13F
→
06/19 11:29, , 14F
06/19 11:29, 14F
推
06/19 22:21, , 15F
06/19 22:21, 15F
→
06/19 22:23, , 16F
06/19 22:23, 16F
→
06/19 22:25, , 17F
06/19 22:25, 17F
→
06/19 22:26, , 18F
06/19 22:26, 18F
→
06/20 06:42, , 19F
06/20 06:42, 19F
→
06/20 06:43, , 20F
06/20 06:43, 20F
推
06/20 15:25, , 21F
06/20 15:25, 21F