Re: [問題] 要求當共同作者？
※ 引述《lloydbacon (培根)》之銘言：
: 如題
: 老闆前一陣子做跟助理做的東西結果非常不好
: 我聽了幾次他們的討論後有次給了建議
: 請他們對於某個現象的分析方法參考另一篇paper的作法
: (此篇paper是去年的paper 雖出於大師之手 但國內知道的人不多)
: 神奇的是老師跟助理參考這篇paper之後
: 結果是好的令人難以置信
: 應該很快就可以開始寫paper了
: 我想請問的是
: 我該跟老闆要要個共同作者掛名嗎？
: 以前我是沒這個觀念
: 但自從千里馬去了美國後
: 美國老師的作法是
: 有哪一位他要好的老師或是研究員給了幫助論文的建議
: 他就讓那位老師/研究員掛名
: 所以我該跟老師說說看嗎？
: PS 老闆平常對我不錯 只是對於paper掛名這件事他沒主動提過
整理自 NIH 的學術倫理指引:
http://ppt.cc/Kt0L
1. Authorship should be reserved for individuals who have met all of the
following conditions:
a. Made a significant contribution to the conception and design or the
analysis and interpretation of data.
b. Participated in drafting the article or reviewing and/or revising it for
intellectual content.
c. Approved the final version of the manuscript.
d. Exceptions may be appropriate for deceased authors (denoted in the
manuscript with a footnote reporting their death).
2. Examples of contributors and contributions that do not merit authorship:
a. Those who only assisted the research by their encouragement and advice
(for example, thesis committee members, lab members or others who
provide substantial suggestions during a committee meeting, lab meeting
or seminar).
b. Those who provided only space, financial support, reagents, occasional
analyses or patient materials.
c. Providing materials in and of itself does not constitute sufficient grounds
for authorship.
心得:
提供技術建議是不符合作者定義的
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 209.124.163.42
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/PhD/M.1397570832.A.41C.html
推
04/15 23:25, , 1F
04/15 23:25, 1F
→
04/15 23:54, , 2F
04/15 23:54, 2F
→
04/16 08:39, , 3F
04/16 08:39, 3F
推
04/21 04:19, , 4F
04/21 04:19, 4F
推
04/21 18:31, , 5F
04/21 18:31, 5F