[問題] 投稿被reject後的相關問題
各位先進好!
小弟在今年年初的時候投稿一篇paper至IEEE-TEC
在昨天收到editor的回覆結果是reject.
而reviewer總共有四位,審稿真的相當認真且提出非常多的建議,
總共有11頁的comments,其中前兩位reveiwer就佔了9.5頁.
而前兩位reviewer提到的問題大多是覺得實驗部做得不夠完整
他們認為實驗的對照與比較有瑕疵, 應該全部重新設計再做過 冏oz..
整體上前兩位reviewer認為這個主題不夠novel但是interesting (這是什麼意思),
然而讓我比較意外的是reviewer#2寫了一整頁半他對實驗規劃的想法,
完整指出我應該把那些部分刪除, 然後重新補哪些實驗數據,
並且把進行步驟 條列式的寫得相當清楚 (大驚!,我應該請他當指導教授...),
他也提到" I would suggest to reject this work and hope that the authors conduct more
and new experiments and submit a new version of the work. I then would be
happy to review it again."
這還是我第一次遇到這麼佛心的reviewer
而後面兩位reviewer倒是沒有太多的意見也沒說reject或accept
只寫了Minor:Paper should be proof read again.
挑了一兩句文法上的錯誤, 以及一些實驗上的小問題.
重點來了(很感謝各位看到這裡..)
依照這些reviewer的意見看來應該是有機會大翻修後resubmit
但最後editor回覆的信件中寫到
"I have now received the recommendation from the associate editor on the
aforementioned paper. Based on that recommendation, I regret to inform you
that I am unable to accept your paper. You should look for other publications
that your paper may be more suited to appear in as your paper is no longer
under consideration by this journal."
是指完全沒有機會resubmit嗎?
還是說可以依照reviewer的意見修改完後換主題?再重新投稿??
感謝各位先進的意見與解答.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 122.124.165.154
→
04/09 21:32, , 1F
04/09 21:32, 1F
→
04/09 21:35, , 2F
04/09 21:35, 2F
→
04/09 21:35, , 3F
04/09 21:35, 3F
→
04/09 21:36, , 4F
04/09 21:36, 4F
→
04/09 21:36, , 5F
04/09 21:36, 5F
→
04/09 21:37, , 6F
04/09 21:37, 6F
推
04/09 21:48, , 7F
04/09 21:48, 7F
→
04/09 22:34, , 8F
04/09 22:34, 8F
→
04/09 22:35, , 9F
04/09 22:35, 9F
→
04/09 22:35, , 10F
04/09 22:35, 10F
→
04/09 22:36, , 11F
04/09 22:36, 11F
→
04/09 22:37, , 12F
04/09 22:37, 12F
→
04/09 22:37, , 13F
04/09 22:37, 13F
推
04/09 22:47, , 14F
04/09 22:47, 14F
→
04/09 22:48, , 15F
04/09 22:48, 15F
推
04/10 05:01, , 16F
04/10 05:01, 16F
推
04/10 20:42, , 17F
04/10 20:42, 17F
推
05/01 16:38, , 18F
05/01 16:38, 18F