[分享] Scientific Peer Review, ca. 1945

看板PhD作者 (seize)時間14年前 (2009/12/08 14:33), 編輯推噓1(100)
留言1則, 1人參與, 最新討論串1/1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-VRBWLpYCPY
雖然講的是生醫領域的投稿情況 不過學術界的情形大概都差不多吧 幾句還滿心有戚戚焉的話 "It's always the third goddamn reviewer that screws us over!!" "Additional experiments, my ass! Do they have any idea how long it took just to do these ones??" "Or I could write it up for Scientific American." -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 67.171.222.241

12/10 10:33, , 1F
這個很讚,就可惜畫質低了點字幕不夠清楚有點傷眼
12/10 10:33, 1F
文章代碼(AID): #1B7VCoxD (PhD)