[外電] Marcin Gortat, Just How High Is His …
連接 http://0rz.tw/YC7f2
Marcin Gortat, Just How High Is His Ceiling?
Gortat的天花板在那裏?
By by Seth Pollack
There's been a lot of talk in the past few days about how good Marcin Gortat is
and how great he might become. Both in the comments on this site and on local
radio, he's being touted as the a future All-Star and was called by KTAR's John
Gambodoro as the best center the Suns have had in the last 20 years. Even
assuming Gambo considers Amare Stoudemire a power forward, that's still a bold
claim after just 20 games in a Suns uniform.
過去一段時間一直有關於Gortat有多好以及他能夠多好的討論。不論是在這裡的評論還是
轉播上的,他被吹棒為未來的全明星同時被來自KTAR的John Gambodoro認為是過去20年裡
太陽有過最好的中鋒。即使假設Gambo把Amare歸為大前鋒,這樣的評論對於才穿上太陽球
衣20場的Gortat來說還是太過大膽了些。
First, let me say that I've always appreciated Gortat's game and even in a
trade that I didn't like, considered him by far the most valuable piece. I am
not "anti-Gortat" either personally -- he's a pretty cool dude who gives great
quotes -- and on the floor. I just don't see him being nearly as good as some
people might believe.
首先,我必須先說我一直很讚賞Gortat在場上的表現而儘管我不並喜歡那個交易,但是到
目前為止他是那個交易中最有價值的部分。我個人並不是一位反Gortat者--他是個不錯的
傢伙有非常好的評價--在球場上也一樣。只是我並沒有看見Gortat接近於人們可能相信他
能做到的那麼好。
Here's the numbers that people are using to make these claims (or maybe unaware
of):
下面是那些人用於佐證的數據(也許他們並沒有意識到):
˙10.6 points and 7.8 rebounds through 20 games with the Suns. Shooting 58.6%
and a career-high 75.9% from the line.
在太陽20場比賽中場均10.6分7.8個籃板。投籃命中率58.6%生涯新高罰球命中率75.9%。
˙Advanced stats show his rebound rate as a Sun at 16.4 which is 19th among
centers with at least 15 minutes per game.
進階數據指出Gortat在太陽的籃板率是16.4排在在場均出賽時間至少15分鐘的中鋒裡排
第19位。
˙His PER is 16.42 (avg is set at 15) which is 20th among centers with at least
15 minutes per game.
他的 PER是16.42(場均排在第15位)在場均出賽時間至少15分鐘的中鋒裡排第20位。
˙Of course, that includes some early games as well as his recent stretch in
which he's recorded six double-doubles in his last eight games. He's averaged
15 points and 10.9 rebounds over that stretch while playing about 27 minutes.
That's very productive and the Suns are 5-3 over that stretch.
當然,這包括了更早前的幾場比賽以及最近表現進一步延伸的比賽,也就是在過去八場
比賽裡得到了6次兩雙的比賽。在這段期間Gortat平均上場時間為27分鐘得到場均15分和
10.9個籃板。這些數據非常有效益而太陽在這段時間5勝3負。
˙Of course, those six double-doubles all came against inferior competition.
Cleveland, Washington, Detroit and then a tired and/or depleted Boston, New
Orleans and Milwaukee. The two games out of those eight that weren't as
productive came against Philadelphia and Charlotte.
當然,這六次兩雙都是在和劣勢對手對戰的時候取得的。騎士,巫師,活塞還有疲累和
/或力氣放盡的超賽,黃蜂和公鹿。八場比賽中未能取得兩雙的兩場是和76人及山貓的比
賽。
(譯者: 打超賽,黃蜂,公鹿三場都是在我們主場;超賽前一場客場和拓荒者打
黃蜂是連三客場 勇士國王和我們 國王和我們是B2B; 公鹿前兩天打完馬刺...)
˙Offensively, 75% of his baskets are assisted which ranks ninth among centers
with at least 15 minutes per game. He's behind guys like Chris Anderson,
Kwame Brown, Anthony Toliver and yes, Channing Frye. This points out how
dependent he is on Nash to get him the ball in scoring position.
進攻方面,他的得分75%來自於助攻在場均出賽時間至少15分鐘的中鋒裡排第9。排在
Chris Anderson, Kwame Brown, Anthony Toliver 還有,沒錯 Channing Frye之後。這
指出了在得分方面他是相當依賴Nash的。
˙In pick and rolls, which account for over half of his offensive possessions,
he's done very well with a FG% of 56.9% (Robin was 68% on pick and rolls last
season). Interestingly, he's FAR more effective on high pick and rolls versus
right side or left side action.
擋切,佔他進攻球權方式的一半以上,他做的很出色有著56.9%的命中率(Robin去年在這
個項目的命中率為68%)。有意思的是,他在高位的擋切效益遠遠比在兩翼的擋切效益來
的高。
(Interestingly一句 不太確定right side or left side action的意思 還請指正 )
˙Gortat is just 7-19 in post ups or isolation situations versus 37-65 in pick
and rolls. He's also 6-12 as a spot up shooter which is surprisingly very
good and shows his discipline in not taking bad shots.
Gortat在背框或低位單打僅有19投7中相較於擋切則是65投37中。定點投籃12投7中讓人
驚訝的好同時不會投壞球顯示他有能有所控制。
˙Defensively, he ranks in the top 30% in pick and roll defense against
ball-handlers and isolation defense. He's average (around 50%) in defending
the roll man or post ups. He's very poor (bottom 10%) defending spot-up
shooters.
防守方面,對擋切中持球球員和低位單打得的防守排在聯盟前30%。對擋切中的掩護球員
或是背框進攻的防守是在平均值(大約50%)。對於定點投籃的防守非常糟糕(最後的10%)
。
The thing that jumps out at me is how skewed his big games have been against
inferior competition. It's GREAT that he's risen to the occasion but calling a
guy who got killed by Elton Brand and had very pedestrian games against the
Nets, Nuggets and Trail Blazers a future All-Star because he's had six
fantastic games is...premature.
讓我在意的是和弱隊比賽中Gortat出色的表現是否過度扭曲了上面這些人們對他的評價。
他的提升當然是非常出色的但是稱一個被Elton Brand吃同時在和籃網,金塊拓荒者比賽中
表現得比路人還路人的傢伙為未來的全明星只是因為他打出了六場夢幻般的比賽似乎...有
點言之過早。
The Suns next face the Thunder which should be an interesting test for Marcin
against the undersized but highly athletic and energetic Ibaka and the big,
lumbering, skilled Krstic.
下一場和雷霆的比賽對Gortat來說會是一個有意思的較量,他需要面對體格較小但是活動
力不錯充滿能量的Ibaka另外還要面對高大,慢,但是有技巧的Krstic。
After that comes two games against the Warriors with Biedrins and Lee and then
another game against the Kings. (Remember DeMarcus Cousins dropped 28 points on
him a few weeks ago.) Then comes Al Jefferson and the Jazz (twice) and Tyson
Chandler and the Mavs before the All-Star break.
在下來是面對勇士的Biedrins 和Lee以及國王的比賽。(DeMarcus Cousins在幾周前的比賽
在和他的對抗中得到了28分。)再來是全明星賽前和Al Jefferson 爵士(兩次)和Tyson
Chandler 小牛的比賽。
If Gortat can continue having good games (15 and 10) against these teams then
maybe I'll start believing in The Hammer as anything more than an average NBA
center.
如果Gortat在這些比賽中依然能夠持續有好的表現(15分10籃板)那我就會開始相信'The
Hammer' Gortat不只是一位平均水準的中鋒。
--
這是在和雷霆比賽前的文章 有些慢了 翻來給大家參考看看
第一次在這裡發外電 希望大家不吝指教
\( ̄ε(# ̄\)☆╰╮o( ̄皿 ̄///)
請鞭小力一點
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 122.117.16.132
※ 編輯: euphoria 來自: 122.117.16.132 (02/06 06:25)
推
02/06 06:24, , 1F
02/06 06:24, 1F
→
02/06 06:25, , 2F
02/06 06:25, 2F
→
02/06 06:25, , 3F
02/06 06:25, 3F
→
02/06 06:26, , 4F
02/06 06:26, 4F
→
02/06 06:26, , 5F
02/06 06:26, 5F
→
02/06 06:27, , 6F
02/06 06:27, 6F
→
02/06 06:28, , 7F
02/06 06:28, 7F
推
02/06 06:30, , 8F
02/06 06:30, 8F
→
02/06 06:31, , 9F
02/06 06:31, 9F
推
02/06 06:33, , 10F
02/06 06:33, 10F
→
02/06 06:33, , 11F
02/06 06:33, 11F
→
02/06 06:34, , 12F
02/06 06:34, 12F
→
02/06 06:34, , 13F
02/06 06:34, 13F
推
02/06 09:30, , 14F
02/06 09:30, 14F
→
02/06 09:31, , 15F
02/06 09:31, 15F
→
02/06 09:31, , 16F
02/06 09:31, 16F
→
02/06 09:32, , 17F
02/06 09:32, 17F
推
02/06 09:40, , 18F
02/06 09:40, 18F
推
02/06 09:41, , 19F
02/06 09:41, 19F
推
02/06 09:42, , 20F
02/06 09:42, 20F
推
02/06 09:43, , 21F
02/06 09:43, 21F
推
02/06 09:44, , 22F
02/06 09:44, 22F
推
02/06 11:05, , 23F
02/06 11:05, 23F
→
02/06 11:05, , 24F
02/06 11:05, 24F
→
02/06 11:06, , 25F
02/06 11:06, 25F
→
02/06 11:07, , 26F
02/06 11:07, 26F
→
02/06 11:07, , 27F
02/06 11:07, 27F
→
02/06 11:08, , 28F
02/06 11:08, 28F
→
02/06 11:08, , 29F
02/06 11:08, 29F
→
02/06 11:09, , 30F
02/06 11:09, 30F
→
02/06 11:09, , 31F
02/06 11:09, 31F
推
02/06 11:13, , 32F
02/06 11:13, 32F
→
02/06 11:13, , 33F
02/06 11:13, 33F
→
02/06 11:14, , 34F
02/06 11:14, 34F
→
02/06 11:14, , 35F
02/06 11:14, 35F
推
02/06 11:15, , 36F
02/06 11:15, 36F
推
02/06 11:21, , 37F
02/06 11:21, 37F
推
02/06 11:47, , 38F
02/06 11:47, 38F
推
02/06 12:23, , 39F
02/06 12:23, 39F
還有 60 則推文
→
02/06 15:52, , 100F
02/06 15:52, 100F
推
02/06 15:55, , 101F
02/06 15:55, 101F
推
02/06 16:17, , 102F
02/06 16:17, 102F
推
02/06 16:19, , 103F
02/06 16:19, 103F
→
02/06 16:19, , 104F
02/06 16:19, 104F
→
02/06 16:20, , 105F
02/06 16:20, 105F
→
02/06 16:20, , 106F
02/06 16:20, 106F
推
02/06 16:26, , 107F
02/06 16:26, 107F
推
02/06 16:32, , 108F
02/06 16:32, 108F
推
02/06 16:41, , 109F
02/06 16:41, 109F
推
02/06 16:43, , 110F
02/06 16:43, 110F
→
02/06 16:45, , 111F
02/06 16:45, 111F
→
02/06 16:45, , 112F
02/06 16:45, 112F
→
02/06 16:46, , 113F
02/06 16:46, 113F
→
02/06 16:47, , 114F
02/06 16:47, 114F
推
02/06 17:33, , 115F
02/06 17:33, 115F
推
02/06 23:07, , 116F
02/06 23:07, 116F
→
02/06 23:07, , 117F
02/06 23:07, 117F
→
02/06 23:08, , 118F
02/06 23:08, 118F
→
02/06 23:08, , 119F
02/06 23:08, 119F
推
02/06 23:49, , 120F
02/06 23:49, 120F
→
02/06 23:49, , 121F
02/06 23:49, 121F
推
02/06 23:54, , 122F
02/06 23:54, 122F
→
02/06 23:54, , 123F
02/06 23:54, 123F
→
02/06 23:55, , 124F
02/06 23:55, 124F
→
02/06 23:55, , 125F
02/06 23:55, 125F
→
02/06 23:56, , 126F
02/06 23:56, 126F
推
02/06 23:57, , 127F
02/06 23:57, 127F
→
02/06 23:58, , 128F
02/06 23:58, 128F
→
02/06 23:58, , 129F
02/06 23:58, 129F
推
02/06 23:59, , 130F
02/06 23:59, 130F
推
02/07 00:42, , 131F
02/07 00:42, 131F
推
02/07 10:10, , 132F
02/07 10:10, 132F
推
02/07 10:47, , 133F
02/07 10:47, 133F
→
02/07 10:48, , 134F
02/07 10:48, 134F
→
02/07 10:50, , 135F
02/07 10:50, 135F
推
02/08 12:49, , 136F
02/08 12:49, 136F
推
02/09 15:54, , 137F
02/09 15:54, 137F
→
02/09 15:54, , 138F
02/09 15:54, 138F
推
02/11 07:13, , 139F
02/11 07:13, 139F