[閒聊] The Growing Legend of Lance Stephenson

看板PACERS作者ckbbwtb (曲終人不散)時間10年前 (2013/11/22 23:42)推噓3(3推 0噓 8→)

留言11則, 4人參與討論串1/1

http://goo.gl/Uow4VH by Zach Lowe 裡面談了他的今年攻守兩端的成長與問題，和可能成長更多的價碼... 純好奇，不知溜馬版眾對下面這兩段有甚麼看法？Lance 又值多少？ Back to Stephenson's future. There's another alternative: swallow hard, let Stephenson walk, and use the midlevel exception (either the big one or the small one, depending in part on George's contract) to find one or even two decent cogs on the cheap. You can get solid wing players in the $3 million range under the new CBA, especially if you're a good team, though the competition gets fierce as more teams hoard cap room. The Bulls lured Mike Dunleavy Jr. at that price; the Blazers snagged Mo Willams and Dorell Wright for about $5.7 million combined. Could the Pacers go that route, chasing guys like Ray Allen, Rodney Stuckey, Jerryd Bayless, Nick Young, and Vince Carter in the veteran bargain bin? Indy fans might vomit at exchanging Stephenson for those names, but, I mean, why are you paying George, Roy Hibbert, and George Hill nearly $40 million combined if they're not good enough to compensate for a downgrade at shooting guard? George is versatile enough that the Pacers could sign whatever wings might be available, regardless of their traditional positions. （中略一大堆） But he's also starting to look pricey — like $7 million to $10 million pricey, especially since Stephenson will come with the sheen of having played under bright postseason lights. Do the Pacers really need a shooting guard at that price? The evidence is unclear. The George/Hill/West/Hibbert quartet is powerful, and it should be able to thrive with any useful shooting guard plugged in the remaining spot. The same lineup, with Granger in Stephenson's place, blitzed the league two seasons ago. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 70.88.152.49

推

JerMi

11/23 02:40, , 1^F

11/23 02:40, 1^F

→

JerMi

11/23 02:41, , 2^F

11/23 02:41, 2^F

→

JerMi

11/23 02:41, , 3^F

11/23 02:41, 3^F