Fw: [外電] Orioles Have Discussed Andre Ethier

看板Orioles作者 (niceplay!niceplay!!)時間9年前 (2015/01/09 22:50), 9年前編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串1/1
※ [本文轉錄自 Dodgers 看板 #1KgMHkr7 ] 作者: Yginger1 (阿薑好帥) 看板: Dodgers 標題: [外電] Orioles Have Discussed Andre Ethier 時間: Mon Jan 5 00:03:53 2015 文章標題標題:Orioles Have Discussed Andre Ethier With Dodgers 全文:The Orioles have had discussions about Andre Ethier with the Dodgers, according to Roch Kubatko of MASNsports.com. Baltimore is in search of a left-handed hitting outfielder and the 32-year-old (33 in April) could be a fit. While Ethier has been prominently mentioned in trade rumors throughout the winter, it would be somewhat surprising to see the Dodgers part with him after dealing Matt Kemp just weeks ago. Ethier was relegated to the bench last season and while he took it in stride, he made it clear to Steve Dilbeck of the L.A. Times in early December that he wanted to start in 2015 – whether that was in Los Angeles or elsewhere. The former two-time All-Star hit just .249/.322/.370 with four homers in 380 plate appearances last season. As Kubatko notes, the Orioles checked on Kemp earlier this winter but decided against pursuing him due to his contract and health issues and the Dodgers’ insistence on getting Kevin Gausman or Dylan Bundy in return. Ethier would not require that same kind of haul, though he also comes with a hefty contract. He’s owed $53.5MM over the next three more years and has a $17.5MM vesting option for 2018 with a $2.5 million buyout, adding up to a full $56MM guarantee. While there is some degree of interest in Ethier, Kubatko says that the Orioles apparently still rate Colby Rasmus as the most likely possibility of their left-handed hitting outfield targets. The O’s also have interest in fellow free agent Nori Aoki. Baltimore reportedly has interest in 41-year-old Ichiro Suzuki, but Kubatko hears he’d be a tough sell for some in the organization. 原文文章連結(請縮網址):http://tinyurl.com/k99cepd 有機會嗎? 交易成功的話 火男就是神了 話說跟金鶯交易可以換到誰? Steve Pearce? Chris Davis? -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 140.114.236.128 ※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Dodgers/M.1420387438.A.D47.html ※ 編輯: Yginger1 (140.114.236.128), 01/05/2015 00:10:24

01/05 00:13, , 1F
金鳥那麼窮﹐估計要吃70%+的薪水才會要Ethier
01/05 00:13, 1F

01/05 01:24, , 2F
Chris Davis LOL 我笑了
01/05 01:24, 2F

01/05 06:37, , 3F
裡頭都寫躲人想要誰了,您提的兩位選手不是躲人急需補的洞
01/05 06:37, 3F

01/05 07:38, , 4F
不希望Dre走..但若在道奇無法先發 當偉殷隊友也祝福
01/05 07:38, 4F

01/05 08:01, , 5F
裡頭哪裡有寫 Gausman跟Bundy是之前討論kemp的菜好嗎
01/05 08:01, 5F

01/05 08:39, , 6F
但也很明顯的指出躲人想要什麼啦~
01/05 08:39, 6F

01/05 09:05, , 7F
能換到潛力新秀薪水又不用吃太多就神了...
01/05 09:05, 7F

01/05 12:47, , 8F
我們神 相對的對面就是傻蛋了XD
01/05 12:47, 8F

01/05 13:24, , 9F
覺得這只是金鳥想簽Colby Rasmus對他經紀人施壓用的
01/05 13:24, 9F

01/05 22:53, , 10F
Rasmus雖曾是STL頂級新秀但對打線的實質幫助遠不如
01/05 22:53, 10F

01/05 22:55, , 11F
Dre 如果金鶯真的盤到Andre...幾乎等同另一個Nick了
01/05 22:55, 11F

01/05 22:56, , 12F
但對道奇來講等同於又走了另一個Kemp
01/05 22:56, 12F

01/07 06:01, , 13F
Rasmus比Ethier好多了
01/07 06:01, 13F

01/07 06:03, , 14F
大概40M買29~33,跟36.5M買33~34,Rasmus是好很多的選擇
01/07 06:03, 14F

01/07 09:29, , 15F
一個顛峰 一個衰退...想也知道選誰 別秀下限了...
01/07 09:29, 15F

01/07 12:38, , 16F
扣除薪水單看成績Dre完勝(單指打擊)但以薪資跟年紀
01/07 12:38, 16F

01/07 12:39, , 17F
來說 Colby是樂勝
01/07 12:39, 17F

01/07 12:41, , 18F
說是這麼說啦 但Dre這三年的健康狀況還是較優
01/07 12:41, 18F

01/07 12:42, , 19F
所以不相信扣除薪水的成份的話 哪一隊不會優先選Dre
01/07 12:42, 19F

01/07 12:44, , 20F
就連道奇去年要不是有四位明星外野手才不信他不先發
01/07 12:44, 20F

01/07 12:45, , 21F
明年要他還在Joc又沒上來Don還不讓他先發...
01/07 12:45, 21F

01/07 12:45, , 22F
可能後年就看不到Don了
01/07 12:45, 22F

01/07 12:51, , 23F
以上單回應nickyang大
01/07 12:51, 23F

01/07 12:53, , 24F
至於b大因為可能邏輯不太一樣 所以說我秀下限我接受
01/07 12:53, 24F

01/07 12:54, , 25F
因為我真的不知道Dre ERA+ 100+是哪裡的數據
01/07 12:54, 25F

01/07 12:54, , 26F
可能觀看數據的網站不同吧
01/07 12:54, 26F

01/08 02:43, , 27F
你說Ethier樂勝是完全忽視年紀跟趨勢的講法
01/08 02:43, 27F

01/08 02:44, , 28F
如果可以這樣看那A-rod現在也樂勝所有三壘手
01/08 02:44, 28F

01/08 02:45, , 29F
Ethier生涯是比較好的打者沒錯,但他老了,衰退明顯
01/08 02:45, 29F

01/08 02:46, , 30F
跟Kemp一樣,Kemp都有人在說是Wells 2.0了
01/08 02:46, 30F

01/08 12:14, , 31F
Wells 2.0 會不會太慘XD
01/08 12:14, 31F

01/08 14:48, , 32F
衰退這種東西不一定是年紀說的算的 當然去年Dre成績
01/08 14:48, 32F

01/08 14:50, , 33F
的確退很多 但主要是因為大部分都是代打上場 所以說
01/08 14:50, 33F

01/08 14:51, , 34F
他開始衰退..個人覺得除非給他足夠的先發機會仍繳出
01/08 14:51, 34F

01/08 14:52, , 35F
去年那種成績對他比較公平 至於A-rod...沒用藥的話
01/08 14:52, 35F

01/08 14:54, , 36F
應該是絕不可能勝過David Wright等頂級三壘手
01/08 14:54, 36F

01/08 14:55, , 37F
在我心目中 他連陳金鋒都不如 因為我接受的教育是
01/08 14:55, 37F

01/08 14:56, , 38F
作弊直接零分 鋒炮在MLB的數據至少全都貨真價實
01/08 14:56, 38F

01/08 15:04, , 39F
另外Kemp雖然因為私人因素不喜歡他 但他現在仍很強
01/08 15:04, 39F

01/08 16:42, , 40F
講真的要扯道德問題 不需要在這 會引人反感
01/08 16:42, 40F

01/08 16:42, , 41F
不討論道德不代表贊同 但是這裡我講了很多次是道奇版喔
01/08 16:42, 41F

01/08 16:43, , 42F
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^這句應該是說不討論不代表贊同不道德
01/08 16:43, 42F

01/08 19:24, , 43F
他應該是活在自己世界吧xd
01/08 19:24, 43F

01/08 19:38, , 44F
體重不要變成Wells 2.0就好
01/08 19:38, 44F

01/08 23:24, , 45F
現在會說Kemp是Wells 2.0也是因傷所苦吧
01/08 23:24, 45F

01/09 03:05, , 46F
Ethier不是代打十之八九會更難看好嗎-_-看看他的split
01/09 03:05, 46F

01/09 03:05, , 47F
Hitting record...
01/09 03:05, 47F

01/09 06:14, , 48F
這就難說了看了一下去年的GameLog從七月底被拔先發
01/09 06:14, 48F

01/09 06:16, , 49F
以前的成績大概與整季平均差不多但之後先發場次表現
01/09 06:16, 49F

01/09 06:17, , 50F
優於代打場次 但終究...沒發生的事誰也說不准
01/09 06:17, 50F

01/09 06:19, , 51F
所以也不能說他要持續先發一定不會更慘或大爆發
01/09 06:19, 51F

01/09 06:20, , 52F
但可以確定的是 要當時Carl Yasiel或Matt其一受傷
01/09 06:20, 52F

01/09 06:21, , 53F
他絕對是補上來的不二人選
01/09 06:21, 53F

01/09 17:59, , 54F
當時補上來的不是王子 是SVS唷
01/09 17:59, 54F

01/09 18:02, , 55F
我以為Ethier現在最大的賣點是帥
01/09 18:02, 55F

01/09 19:36, , 56F
期待Dre讓m大刮目相看
01/09 19:36, 56F

01/09 19:46, , 57F
Dre 7/20以後被拔先發(之前幾乎場場先發)
01/09 19:46, 57F

01/09 19:47, , 58F
有興趣的版友可以去查察Scot在7/20之後的先發場次
01/09 19:47, 58F

01/09 19:48, , 59F
如果懶的查那就當b大說的是正確的吧~
01/09 19:48, 59F

01/09 21:20, , 60F
被拔應該是7/25 打成那樣不被拔才怪 倒是SVS很會把握
01/09 21:20, 60F

01/09 21:21, , 61F
去年道奇的CF就是悲劇一場 一開始王子的打擊很囧
01/09 21:21, 61F

01/09 21:22, , 62F
後期換成Puig是守備很囧 看春訓磨一磨會不會好一點
01/09 21:22, 62F
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ※ 轉錄者: Aniceplay (36.229.213.73), 01/09/2015 22:50:02
文章代碼(AID): #1Kh-gSd2 (Orioles)