[外電] Time to stop the Vinsanity

看板Nets作者 (Miami Heat)時間18年前 (2006/05/16 00:00), 編輯推噓18(18026)
留言44則, 6人參與, 最新討論串1/1
http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/basketball/story/417905p-353003c.html The Nets lost another tough one yesterday at home to the Heat, 102-92, and that pretty much does it. They will travel down to Miami now, likely drop their fourth straight game, say goodbye to the playoffs again. But there is another game going on out here this spring for the Nets, the one they will never admit exists. It is the contest between Richard Jefferson and Vince Carter to decide who goes, who gets to stay in the Meadowlands when the Big Trade is made. The Big Trade must be made. That is more obvious now even than it was two weeks ago. Somebody goes, finally putting an end to the stylistic chafing between Jefferson and Carter. The defeat in Game 4 yesterday was another lucid argument to retain Jefferson, to deal the flashier option. Carter, we all know, is a breathtaking player, a valuable gate draw. But the Nets have come to rely on him far too much, too often, and he is only too happy to enable that dependence. Once again yesterday, the wrong Carter showed up in the building. This wasn't the Carter who beat the Pacers. This was the Carter who gets tangled in bodies or bottled up by the remarkably quick Dwyane Wade, then forces jumpers off Lawrence Frank's unimaginative isolations. It is the Carter who doesn't quite make the right decisions when the opponent constructs a wall of defenders to cut off his lanes. "You have to take what they give you, be unselfish," said Carter, who fired 28 shots and made 12 of them. "I just wanted to be aggressive. If it's there, it's there. Get to the paint, to the free throw line. Make them pay for putting a line up there of three, four guys." He didn't do what he said. And really, this playoff lesson from the Heat is all for the best. The Nets, as constituted, are not a team that can win a title. They require one major transaction this offseason, a package deal sending two draft picks and Carter to get a different, taller star. You've all heard one name by now, Kevin Garnett. There are others out there, too. A cosmetic series victory over the Heat might have disguised that need, confused the issue. Already, after the Nets knocked off the Pacers, Net management was talking as if Jefferson-Carter was a viable combo. Now, though, it is much tougher to make that case. Jefferson, the more unselfish player, is written out of the script too often. He was 7-for-13 yesterday from the field, 2-for-3 from three-point range. He deserved to see the ball more often, have a few more plays run for him. "Unfortunately, I just work here," said Jefferson, who has been frustrated at times this season with the shot distribution. "As long as I have been here, I have never been about offense and this and that. Defense, that has been more the story." The Nets now are well on their way to a third straight playoff exit under Lawrence Frank, without reaching a conference final. They aren't playing the kind of motion basketball that got them to the NBA Finals twice under Byron Scott, who took a lot of grief from Jason Kidd and never received enough credit. They stand around and watch Carter too often. The coach deserves some blame. He's been outmaneuvered by Pat Riley. When Carter plays out of his mind, the Nets still can beat anyone, even out of a halfcourt set. When Carter is 0-for-7 from beyond the three-point line, like yesterday, the Nets lose. "Nothing different than we have seen the last three games," Frank insisted about the Heat triple-teams. "Shaq comes to the strong-side box. Vince sometimes made passes and we didn't execute. I don't think anything caught him off guard." Frank has two years left on his contract, and maybe he deserves one last autumn with a Carter-less roster to prove he remembers how to coach a real offense. Kidd no longer can be allowed to call the shot on this, though. It must be Rod Thorn's decision. Time to reclaim the team concept, find another way, because only one team ever won titles this way and there was only one Michael Jordan. "Go back to the drawing board," Carter said. He meant for Game 5, but it's more than that now. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 203.73.6.217

05/16 00:14, , 1F
嘖...這種事留給Thorn去傷腦筋吧...
05/16 00:14, 1F

05/16 00:31, , 2F
我認為交易RJ or VC都不是很好的抉擇 這支球隊缺乏的是深
05/16 00:31, 2F

05/16 00:32, , 3F
度。在季賽當中已經太多次 先發下去休息 馬上從領先十幾分
05/16 00:32, 3F

05/16 00:32, , 4F
落後下去。不能太責怪VC,目前籃網能走到這裡 VC功不可沒
05/16 00:32, 4F

05/16 00:33, , 5F
RJ是效率很高的球員,我覺得教練的確是太依賴了VC
05/16 00:33, 5F

05/16 00:34, , 6F
所以我們是否要一個更好的教練 知道如何把VC和RJ共同發揮
05/16 00:34, 6F

05/16 00:34, , 7F
到最大值,起碼我們知道VC和RJ不會互斥。可是教練太多戰術
05/16 00:34, 7F

05/16 00:34, , 8F
都交給VC了。
05/16 00:34, 8F

05/16 00:35, , 9F
禁區方面 KG不是籃網的解答 籃網已經有NK了 我們需要的是
05/16 00:35, 9F

05/16 00:35, , 10F
深度...大叔下季可能不會留下了 我們要更多大個子在板凳
05/16 00:35, 10F

05/16 00:35, , 11F
後衛方面 不能在仰賴Vaughn了 根本是沒人可用才用他的
05/16 00:35, 11F

05/16 00:42, , 12F
就現在情形來看...J-Mac應該也不太可能續約...
05/16 00:42, 12F

05/16 00:44, , 13F
不然想突破現在的困境其實挺困難的....
05/16 00:44, 13F

05/16 00:45, , 14F
中間少一句....=_=
05/16 00:45, 14F

05/16 00:45, , 15F
他們兩個一定要走一個嗎?
05/16 00:45, 15F

05/16 00:45, , 16F
"除非選秀去選到不出世的怪傑,"
05/16 00:45, 16F

05/16 00:45, , 17F
總覺的缺一不可,籃網比較缺的應該是大個吧
05/16 00:45, 17F

05/16 00:45, , 18F
薪資已爆,沒辦法....
05/16 00:45, 18F

05/16 00:46, , 19F
真糟糕...那三劍客要拆夥了?
05/16 00:46, 19F

05/16 00:47, , 20F
其實也未必,不然當初怎麼弄來VC的...XD
05/16 00:47, 20F

05/16 00:48, , 21F
只要能補到我們需要的功能型球員就夠了吧...
05/16 00:48, 21F

05/16 00:48, , 22F
還是希望他們別拆夥比較好..才一年多的說><
05/16 00:48, 22F

05/16 00:49, , 23F
其實你們家替補戰力真的該好好重整一下的 季後賽體力耗損的
05/16 00:49, 23F

05/16 00:50, , 24F
板凳搞的先發太累了阿ˋˊ
05/16 00:50, 24F

05/16 00:50, , 25F
很快 不像例行賽靠四巨頭就夠了 不過就算找來有用的功能性球
05/16 00:50, 25F

05/16 00:51, , 26F
員 法凸可能還是不會好好運用...我倒是很想問他 到底怎樣的
05/16 00:51, 26F

05/16 00:51, , 27F
的球員他才有信心用...
05/16 00:51, 27F

05/16 00:52, , 28F
maybe...教練也是個隱憂阿!?
05/16 00:52, 28F

05/16 00:52, , 29F
哈 難道湖人止於第一輪會說 Time to stop the Kobe 這種鳥話嗎
05/16 00:52, 29F

05/16 00:52, , 30F
像是之前的真男人和Johnson都不錯用阿(又回到老話題 囧)
05/16 00:52, 30F

05/16 00:55, , 31F
Frank似乎不太欣賞濫仗型球員....
05/16 00:55, 31F

05/16 00:56, , 32F
剛看了一下 VC本季缺陣的三場例行賽 籃網三場都輸
05/16 00:56, 32F

05/16 00:55, , 33F
如果法禿的腦筋開化一點就不會走到這步田了
05/16 00:55, 33F

05/16 00:56, , 34F
Marc跟J-Mac攪和的能力不錯,但教練就是不喜歡...
05/16 00:56, 34F

05/16 00:57, , 35F
RJ缺陣4場 籃網四場也都輸...所以 這篇其實沒啥意義
05/16 00:57, 35F

05/16 00:58, , 36F
哪個球隊沒濫仗型球員,又不是一定要照馬刺那樣,
05/16 00:58, 36F

05/16 00:58, , 37F
人人乖乖的照戰術跑...
05/16 00:58, 37F

05/16 00:59, , 38F
但是這下子..感覺球員心情都受影響了吧ˋˊ?
05/16 00:59, 38F

05/16 01:00, , 39F
下一場還是在客場...怎麼辦
05/16 01:00, 39F

05/16 01:02, , 40F
你們家球季還沒結束呢 之後再來討論吧 XD ...
05/16 01:02, 40F

05/16 01:03, , 41F
這個嘛..."認真起來"的籃網還是很可怕的...
05/16 01:03, 41F

05/16 01:03, , 42F
起碼可以拼到4:2吧...=_=
05/16 01:03, 42F

05/16 01:04, , 43F
籃網籃網別洩氣阿ˋˊ
05/16 01:04, 43F

05/16 02:04, , 44F
教練才是真正該換的啊..
05/16 02:04, 44F
文章代碼(AID): #14QAM3vx (Nets)