[外電] Time to stop the Vinsanity
http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/basketball/story/417905p-353003c.html
The Nets lost another tough one yesterday at home to the Heat, 102-92, and
that pretty much does it. They will travel down to Miami now, likely drop
their fourth straight game, say goodbye to the playoffs again.
But there is another game going on out here this spring for the Nets, the one
they will never admit exists. It is the contest between Richard Jefferson and
Vince Carter to decide who goes, who gets to stay in the Meadowlands when the
Big Trade is made. The Big Trade must be made. That is more obvious now even
than it was two weeks ago.
Somebody goes, finally putting an end to the stylistic chafing between
Jefferson and Carter. The defeat in Game 4 yesterday was another lucid
argument to retain Jefferson, to deal the flashier option. Carter, we all
know, is a breathtaking player, a valuable gate draw. But the Nets have come
to rely on him far too much, too often, and he is only too happy to enable
that dependence.
Once again yesterday, the wrong Carter showed up in the building. This wasn't
the Carter who beat the Pacers. This was the Carter who gets tangled in
bodies or bottled up by the remarkably quick Dwyane Wade, then forces jumpers
off Lawrence Frank's unimaginative isolations. It is the Carter who doesn't
quite make the right decisions when the opponent constructs a wall of
defenders to cut off his lanes.
"You have to take what they give you, be unselfish," said Carter, who fired
28 shots and made 12 of them. "I just wanted to be aggressive. If it's there,
it's there. Get to the paint, to the free throw line. Make them pay for
putting a line up there of three, four guys."
He didn't do what he said. And really, this playoff lesson from the Heat is
all for the best. The Nets, as constituted, are not a team that can win a
title. They require one major transaction this offseason, a package deal
sending two draft picks and Carter to get a different, taller star. You've
all heard one name by now, Kevin Garnett. There are others out there, too.
A cosmetic series victory over the Heat might have disguised that need,
confused the issue. Already, after the Nets knocked off the Pacers, Net
management was talking as if Jefferson-Carter was a viable combo.
Now, though, it is much tougher to make that case. Jefferson, the more
unselfish player, is written out of the script too often. He was 7-for-13
yesterday from the field, 2-for-3 from three-point range. He deserved to see
the ball more often, have a few more plays run for him.
"Unfortunately, I just work here," said Jefferson, who has been frustrated at
times this season with the shot distribution. "As long as I have been here, I
have never been about offense and this and that. Defense, that has been more
the story."
The Nets now are well on their way to a third straight playoff exit under
Lawrence Frank, without reaching a conference final. They aren't playing the
kind of motion basketball that got them to the NBA Finals twice under Byron
Scott, who took a lot of grief from Jason Kidd and never received enough
credit. They stand around and watch Carter too often.
The coach deserves some blame. He's been outmaneuvered by Pat Riley. When
Carter plays out of his mind, the Nets still can beat anyone, even out of a
halfcourt set. When Carter is 0-for-7 from beyond the three-point line, like
yesterday, the Nets lose.
"Nothing different than we have seen the last three games," Frank insisted
about the Heat triple-teams. "Shaq comes to the strong-side box. Vince
sometimes made passes and we didn't execute. I don't think anything caught
him off guard."
Frank has two years left on his contract, and maybe he deserves one last
autumn with a Carter-less roster to prove he remembers how to coach a real
offense. Kidd no longer can be allowed to call the shot on this, though. It
must be Rod Thorn's decision.
Time to reclaim the team concept, find another way, because only one team
ever won titles this way and there was only one Michael Jordan.
"Go back to the drawing board," Carter said. He meant for Game 5, but it's
more than that now.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 203.73.6.217
推
05/16 00:14, , 1F
05/16 00:14, 1F
推
05/16 00:31, , 2F
05/16 00:31, 2F
→
05/16 00:32, , 3F
05/16 00:32, 3F
→
05/16 00:32, , 4F
05/16 00:32, 4F
→
05/16 00:33, , 5F
05/16 00:33, 5F
推
05/16 00:34, , 6F
05/16 00:34, 6F
→
05/16 00:34, , 7F
05/16 00:34, 7F
→
05/16 00:34, , 8F
05/16 00:34, 8F
推
05/16 00:35, , 9F
05/16 00:35, 9F
→
05/16 00:35, , 10F
05/16 00:35, 10F
→
05/16 00:35, , 11F
05/16 00:35, 11F
推
05/16 00:42, , 12F
05/16 00:42, 12F
推
05/16 00:44, , 13F
05/16 00:44, 13F
→
05/16 00:45, , 14F
05/16 00:45, 14F
推
05/16 00:45, , 15F
05/16 00:45, 15F
→
05/16 00:45, , 16F
05/16 00:45, 16F
→
05/16 00:45, , 17F
05/16 00:45, 17F
→
05/16 00:45, , 18F
05/16 00:45, 18F
→
05/16 00:46, , 19F
05/16 00:46, 19F
→
05/16 00:47, , 20F
05/16 00:47, 20F
→
05/16 00:48, , 21F
05/16 00:48, 21F
推
05/16 00:48, , 22F
05/16 00:48, 22F
推
05/16 00:49, , 23F
05/16 00:49, 23F
→
05/16 00:50, , 24F
05/16 00:50, 24F
→
05/16 00:50, , 25F
05/16 00:50, 25F
→
05/16 00:51, , 26F
05/16 00:51, 26F
→
05/16 00:51, , 27F
05/16 00:51, 27F
→
05/16 00:52, , 28F
05/16 00:52, 28F
推
05/16 00:52, , 29F
05/16 00:52, 29F
→
05/16 00:52, , 30F
05/16 00:52, 30F
推
05/16 00:55, , 31F
05/16 00:55, 31F
推
05/16 00:56, , 32F
05/16 00:56, 32F
推
05/16 00:55, , 33F
05/16 00:55, 33F
→
05/16 00:56, , 34F
05/16 00:56, 34F
→
05/16 00:57, , 35F
05/16 00:57, 35F
→
05/16 00:58, , 36F
05/16 00:58, 36F
→
05/16 00:58, , 37F
05/16 00:58, 37F
推
05/16 00:59, , 38F
05/16 00:59, 38F
→
05/16 01:00, , 39F
05/16 01:00, 39F
推
05/16 01:02, , 40F
05/16 01:02, 40F
推
05/16 01:03, , 41F
05/16 01:03, 41F
→
05/16 01:03, , 42F
05/16 01:03, 42F
推
05/16 01:04, , 43F
05/16 01:04, 43F
推
05/16 02:04, , 44F
05/16 02:04, 44F