Kidd接受ESPN訪問
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/dailydime?page=dailydime-060203
這個網址進去右邊第一塊那個影片(不確定要不要先裝ESPN Motion)
有Stephen A. Smith訪問Kidd的節錄片段
其中有一段跟Marbury有關...我覺得還滿精彩的 大家可以看看
以下是那一段的英文記錄以及中文翻譯(有聽錯或翻錯的請指教~)
Smith: Stephon Marbury sat in this very chair a few months ago, has something
to say about you right here. Stephon Marbury stated without question
he's the best point guard in the NBA. I asked him specifically if that
included Jason Kidd and he said yes. So obviously I asked him, what
makes him better. Here's his response...
Smith: Marbury幾個月前才坐在這椅子上接受訪問過,然後他說了一些關於你的話。
Marbury當時說,無庸置疑的,他自己是全NBA最好的控球後衛。我當時問他說
是否包含比Jason Kidd還強,而他說是。想當然爾,我問他到底哪一點讓他認
為自己比較強。以下是他當時的回應...
Marbury: What makes me better? If you're watching a basketball game and my
last name wasn't on my jersey and his last name wasn't on his jersey,
and he played the best game that he could possibly play and I played
the best game I could possibly play, you tell me who you think is
better.
Marbury: 哪一點讓我認為我比較強?假設你在看一場球賽且我的球衣背面並沒有我的
名字,他的球衣背面也沒有他的名字,然後剛好我們兩人都打出了生涯最好
的一場球,你告訴我你認為哪一名球員比較強。
Smith: What is your response?
Smith: 你的回應呢?
Kidd: Well I think, you know, he has the right to his opinion and, you know
if we were in a playground situation, unfortunately, I think I would
win. You know, I'm bigger, I'm stronger and I'm quicker, uhh, you know..
Kidd: 嗯我覺得,他有權力發表他的意見,但是假設我們真的在一個鬥牛的場合,很
遺憾的,我認為我會贏。我比他高大,強壯,而且又比他還快...
(crowd cheers)
(歡呼聲)
--
Kidd隊長很少會那麼直接的發言(他最愛拐彎抹角了...)
這次直接了當的把自己的想法說出來還真是難得
而且一說就心狠手辣不留情面...我覺得真的是太屌了
看完了有一股莫名的爽感...XD
看國外的討論區在討論整個訪問內容(ESPN在美國剛播完整集)
似乎非常的棒
聽說Smith問的問題都非常好
而Kidd的回答也都很絕
聽說裡面Kidd誇下豪語說他認為籃網是東區最強的球隊
當Smith問他是否比Detroit還強時
Kidd回答說:是! 而且還補上一句說現在的籃網隊是為了季後賽打造的...
我只能說...隊長還真有信心哪!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 220.132.117.11
推
02/04 04:41, , 1F
02/04 04:41, 1F
推
02/04 07:22, , 2F
02/04 07:22, 2F
推
02/04 08:54, , 3F
02/04 08:54, 3F
推
02/04 09:47, , 4F
02/04 09:47, 4F
推
02/04 09:53, , 5F
02/04 09:53, 5F
→
02/04 09:53, , 6F
02/04 09:53, 6F
→
02/04 09:54, , 7F
02/04 09:54, 7F
推
02/04 10:58, , 8F
02/04 10:58, 8F
推
02/04 11:00, , 9F
02/04 11:00, 9F
→
02/04 11:00, , 10F
02/04 11:00, 10F
推
02/04 14:52, , 11F
02/04 14:52, 11F
推
02/04 19:02, , 12F
02/04 19:02, 12F
→
02/04 19:03, , 13F
02/04 19:03, 13F
推
02/04 19:13, , 14F
02/04 19:13, 14F
→
02/04 19:14, , 15F
02/04 19:14, 15F
推
02/04 20:12, , 16F
02/04 20:12, 16F
推
02/04 20:43, , 17F
02/04 20:43, 17F
→
02/04 20:44, , 18F
02/04 20:44, 18F
推
02/04 22:55, , 19F
02/04 22:55, 19F
→
02/04 22:56, , 20F
02/04 22:56, 20F
→
02/04 22:57, , 21F
02/04 22:57, 21F
推
02/04 23:34, , 22F
02/04 23:34, 22F
推
02/05 03:45, , 23F
02/05 03:45, 23F