[外電] Granderson ain’t so bad
http://tinyurl.com/9yx6gh4
Granderson ain’t so bad
Posted by: Chad Jennings - Posted in Misc on Oct 26, 2012
Curtis Granderson strikes out a lot and he was a disappointment in the
postseason, but do the Yankees really need to trade him this winter?
Getting rid of Granderson has become a popular position ever since his dismal
playoff performance — even before that, really — and I’ve said that
trading Granderson might make sense if the Yankees can get a starting pitcher
for him, but is Granderson really a must-go player who’s easy to lose and
easy to replace?
“I will listen on anybody,” Brian Cashman told Joel Sherman. “But you
would be hard-pressed to get enough to trade a center fielder who is a
perennial 40-homer-plus man.”
If Alex Rodriguez is no longer a 30-homer guy, and Nick Swisher is on his way
out, then only true home run hitters left on the Yankees roster are Robinson
Cano, Mark Teixeira and Granderson. Granted, the team will almost certainly
add some power at DH or an outfield corner, but the idea that this lineup is
overloaded with home run hitters is an exaggeration. Frankly, putting those
three — Cano, Teixeira and Granderson — in the 3, 4 and 5 spots wouldn’t
be a bad middle of the order. Add Derek Jeter at the top, slide Rodriguez
into the No. 2 or 6 spot, and the Yankees have the sensible beginnings of a
pretty good lineup.
Three common complaints about Granderson:
1. He strikes out too much
He strikes out a lot, but does he really strike out too much? If he cut down
on the strikeout numbers he’d be one of the elite hitters in baseball, but
there’s a lot of gray area between the elite hitters and the guys who are a
drain on the offense. It’s kind of like the bad routes Granderson takes in
center field. Yes, he takes bad routes, but he’s athletic enough to make up
for them a lot of the time. The trade off keeps him from being an elite
defender, but it lets him remain a viable one. Yes, Granderson strikes out a
lot, but those strikeouts come with the significant upside of 40-plus homers.
2. He was a massive disappointment in the postseason
So were most of the Yankees. If Granderson is going to be knocked for his
dismal showing this month, it’s also worth noting that he hit more home runs
in the final month of the season than in any other month, and before this
postseason he was a career .267/.375/.535 hitter in the playoffs
(.313/.459/.583 in his first two postseasons with the Yankees).
3. The Yankees can’t afford him beyond 2013
I tend to agree that the Yankees will have a hard time signing both
Granderson and Cano beyond next season, and with so much center field depth
rising through the system — and Brett Gardner available to play center at
any point — it makes sense to leave Granderson off the priority list. But
that expiring contract also limits Granderson’s trade value. As Sherman
wrote, the idea of a Carlos Beltran-type deal for an elite young starter
seems unlikely. It’s all about value here. If nothing else, the Yankees will
be able to offer Granderson a qualifying offer at the end of next season and
get a draft pick for him. That’s not a terrible fallback plan, and might be
as valuable as anything the Yankees will find on the trade market.
Look, there’s some merit to trading Granderson, but a lot of that merit is
based on the idea that some other team will value him as an elite run
producer who hits for a ton of power out of the center field position. Thing
is, the Yankees should — and do — view him the same way, and they’d have
to get get similar value to make a trade worthwhile. He might be frustrating
to watch swing and miss, but he might be just as frustrating to try and
replace.
==
簡單翻譯 :
也許 Grandy 有些問題,看著他揮空並且被三振是感覺相當挫敗的,
但在嘗試找到適當人選交易取代他,可能更令人感覺到挫敗。
畢竟要找到一個可取代賽季持續有 40-homer-plus 的外野手並不是這麼容易!!
(中間有段未來打線的安排和火力描述預想,大家可參考看看)
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.34.187.24
※ 編輯: wsan 來自: 114.34.187.24 (10/27 01:04)
推
10/27 01:15, , 1F
10/27 01:15, 1F
→
10/27 01:17, , 2F
10/27 01:17, 2F
推
10/27 11:28, , 3F
10/27 11:28, 3F
推
10/27 12:51, , 4F
10/27 12:51, 4F
→
10/27 12:51, , 5F
10/27 12:51, 5F
推
10/27 12:57, , 6F
10/27 12:57, 6F
推
10/27 14:35, , 7F
10/27 14:35, 7F
推
10/27 15:44, , 8F
10/27 15:44, 8F
→
10/27 15:45, , 9F
10/27 15:45, 9F
→
10/27 16:59, , 10F
10/27 16:59, 10F
→
10/27 17:00, , 11F
10/27 17:00, 11F
推
10/27 17:20, , 12F
10/27 17:20, 12F
→
10/27 17:21, , 13F
10/27 17:21, 13F
→
10/27 17:21, , 14F
10/27 17:21, 14F
→
10/27 17:22, , 15F
10/27 17:22, 15F
→
10/27 17:23, , 16F
10/27 17:23, 16F
→
10/27 17:23, , 17F
10/27 17:23, 17F
→
10/27 17:40, , 18F
10/27 17:40, 18F
推
10/27 23:34, , 19F
10/27 23:34, 19F
推
10/28 00:58, , 20F
10/28 00:58, 20F
→
10/28 06:41, , 21F
10/28 06:41, 21F
→
10/28 08:06, , 22F
10/28 08:06, 22F
→
10/28 08:06, , 23F
10/28 08:06, 23F
→
10/28 08:07, , 24F
10/28 08:07, 24F
→
10/28 08:07, , 25F
10/28 08:07, 25F
→
10/28 08:08, , 26F
10/28 08:08, 26F
→
10/28 08:08, , 27F
10/28 08:08, 27F
→
10/28 08:09, , 28F
10/28 08:09, 28F
推
10/28 09:25, , 29F
10/28 09:25, 29F
推
10/28 09:30, , 30F
10/28 09:30, 30F