[Blog] Yankees agree to contracts with Gaud …

看板NY-Yankees作者 (Ti Amo)時間14年前 (2010/01/19 09:53), 編輯推噓40(40072)
留言112則, 34人參與, 最新討論串1/1
Yankees agree to contracts with Gaudin and Logan The Yankees have agreed to contracts with Chad Gaudin and Boone Logan, avoiding arbitration with their only remaining arbitration-eligible players. UPDATE, 7:53 p.m.: The Yankees just sent this release. The New York Yankees announced today they have agreed to one-year contracts with right-handed pitcher Chad Gaudin and left-handed pitcher Boone Logan, avoiding arbitration with both players. Gaudin, 26, was acquired by the Yankees on August 6, 2009, from the San Diego Padres in exchange for cash considerations. He combined to go 6-10 with a 4.64 ERA in 31 appearances (25 starts) with both clubs in 2009. He made 11 appearances (six starts) with the Yankees, going 2-0 with a 3.43 ERA as the Yankees won each of his starts. Gaudin owns a career mark of 34-35 with a 4.50 ERA in 216 Major League appearances (75 starts) with Tampa Bay, Toronto, Oakland, Chicago-NL, San Diego and the Yankees. Logan, 25, was acquired by the Yankees along with right-handed pitcher Javier Vazquez in exchange for outfielder Melky Cabrera, left-handed pitcher Mike Dunn and minor league right-handed pitcher Arodys Vizcaino on December 22, 2009. He owns 164 career Major League appearances with Chicago-AL and Atlanta, going 5-5 with a 5.78 ERA. He split the 2009 season between Triple-A Gwinnett and the Braves, posting a 1-1 record with a 5.19 ERA at the Major League level where he held left-handed batters to a .231 batting average (9-for-39) with no home runs. UPDATE, 8:09 p.m.: The Associated Press reports that Gaudin got “about $2.9 million” and Logan got “about $600,000.” UPDATE, 8:33 p.m.: Make that $2.95 million for Gaudin, $590,000 for Logan. source:http://tinyurl.com/ya2amfz 重點:洋基跟狗蛋與Logan分別簽了2.95M和59萬鎂的合約以避免薪資仲裁 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 59.115.143.227

01/19 10:04, , 1F
狗蛋也太貴了吧?!
01/19 10:04, 1F

01/19 10:12, , 2F
長中繼的狗蛋好貴哦,不過他有先發備胎的能力啦
01/19 10:12, 2F

01/19 10:25, , 3F
狗蛋很不錯, 尾勁和控球都不錯, 5局內還蠻有壓制性的
01/19 10:25, 3F

01/19 10:28, , 4F
2M的預算沒了~ =.=
01/19 10:28, 4F

01/19 10:29, , 5F
Damon bye bye~
01/19 10:29, 5F

01/19 10:47, , 6F
從這個約看起來,Cashman壓根不信小王5月可以上場吧
01/19 10:47, 6F

01/19 10:50, , 7F
樓上是怎樣扯到小王的 = = 何況狗蛋又不是FA signing
01/19 10:50, 7F

01/19 10:51, , 8F
Gaudin比米崔好
01/19 10:51, 8F

01/19 11:11, , 9F
又出現一位心理分析師了
01/19 11:11, 9F

01/19 11:18, , 10F
Gaudin要3M......
01/19 11:18, 10F

01/19 12:40, , 11F
關心理分析什麼事?就純粹人家覺得2.95M給Gaudin比
01/19 12:40, 11F

01/19 12:41, , 12F
給小王保險啊.. 扯到小王都不行嗎? O.o
01/19 12:41, 12F

01/19 13:31, , 13F
有沒有4M、最樂觀五月才能上場,跟2.95M明天就能丟球
01/19 13:31, 13F

01/19 13:32, , 14F
也能扯在一起的八卦?
01/19 13:32, 14F

01/19 14:10, , 15F
喔 我不像各位都是分析專家啊 身為一個想要NYY簽回
01/19 14:10, 15F

01/19 14:10, , 16F
小王當備位先發的球迷來說 當然可以扯在一起
01/19 14:10, 16F

01/19 14:11, , 17F
而且現在說小王是4M會不會不太適合?很明顯目前根本
01/19 14:11, 17F

01/19 14:11, , 18F
不用出到這麼多..
01/19 14:11, 18F

01/19 14:11, , 19F
不過至少我確認兩件事啦 本板不歡迎心得閒聊
01/19 14:11, 19F

01/19 14:12, , 20F
還有各位分析專家扣帽子的技巧蠻好的
01/19 14:12, 20F

01/19 14:12, , 21F
可是我覺得樓上比較像在扣帽子
01/19 14:12, 21F

01/19 14:13, , 22F
狗蛋的消息也可以扯王然後還幫$作心理分析 被抓包還
01/19 14:13, 22F

01/19 14:13, , 23F
可以說人家扣帽子 真是高招高招 小弟失敬失敬
01/19 14:13, 23F

01/19 14:14, , 24F
覺得不受歡迎那就慢走不送啊
01/19 14:14, 24F

01/19 14:15, , 25F
沒傷沒痛非FA的Gaudin跟王有什麼可比性?這是閒聊還是
01/19 14:15, 25F

01/19 14:15, , 26F
幻想?
01/19 14:15, 26F

01/19 14:16, , 27F
b板友妄想發作?
01/19 14:16, 27F

01/19 14:18, , 28F
謝謝,掰掰。
01/19 14:18, 28F

01/19 14:22, , 29F
小王現在頂多給0.5M MiLB + 1.62M MLB(day by day) +
01/19 14:22, 29F

01/19 14:24, , 30F
1M(100IP) + 1M(150IP) + 1M(ERA)
01/19 14:24, 30F

01/19 14:34, , 31F
兩個完全不同的case拿來比本來就很奇怪
01/19 14:34, 31F

01/19 14:48, , 32F
王已經不是洋基隊員了 要討論轉去王版討論
01/19 14:48, 32F

01/19 15:03, , 33F
等王像Sheet一樣有測試會再來談 好嗎
01/19 15:03, 33F

01/19 16:34, , 34F
一酸還有一酸酸
01/19 16:34, 34F

01/19 16:54, , 35F
此地無銀
01/19 16:54, 35F

01/19 17:13, , 36F
peace
01/19 17:13, 36F

01/19 19:10, , 37F
To nuchaos,就算王已不是洋基隊員,記得版規是可以討
01/19 19:10, 37F

01/19 19:12, , 38F
論前隊員的,就算你不同意他的言論,也不用叫人家去那
01/19 19:12, 38F

01/19 19:12, , 39F
一版去
01/19 19:12, 39F
還有 33 則推文
01/21 11:42, , 73F
而我也當然瞭解不是我不受歡迎,因為大家根本不認識
01/21 11:42, 73F

01/21 11:43, , 74F
我,這是很容易理解的事
01/21 11:43, 74F

01/21 11:44, , 75F
就這件事來說,我的立場上來看,我只是一句閒聊話
01/21 11:44, 75F

01/21 11:44, , 76F
就被說是心理分析師,跟某某一樣(事實上我也知道
01/21 11:44, 76F

01/21 11:45, , 77F
某某是誰,我也不喜歡他),相信有人被這樣對待都不
01/21 11:45, 77F

01/21 11:45, , 78F
會高興的,這種情形難道不像是文字獄嗎
01/21 11:45, 78F

01/21 11:46, , 79F
我可以理解這邊被一些似是而非的言論搞得很亂,不過
01/21 11:46, 79F

01/21 11:47, , 80F
像這樣看到黑影就開槍是不是太過火了點
01/21 11:47, 80F

01/21 11:47, , 81F
以部落客或NYY fans而已,像受人尊敬的CCLu大就不會
01/21 11:47, 81F

01/21 11:48, , 82F
做這種一言不合下逐客令的事吧
01/21 11:48, 82F

01/21 11:48, , 83F
當然我還是會繼續來這邊看文章啦,甚至偶爾插兩句話
01/21 11:48, 83F

01/21 11:49, , 84F
畢竟這邊文章確實很棒,不來看是我自己吃虧
01/21 11:49, 84F

01/21 11:49, , 85F
最後是為什麼會扯到小王,我的邏輯是差不多同樣的
01/21 11:49, 85F

01/21 11:50, , 86F
價位,同樣可以當備位先發,所以就拿來比而已
01/21 11:50, 86F

01/21 11:51, , 87F
或許用Mitre來比會更顯著?或許Cashman手上其實有另
01/21 11:51, 87F

01/21 11:51, , 88F
一筆預算要用來追小王?或許我把Cashman換成NYY就
01/21 11:51, 88F

01/21 11:52, , 89F
不會被說是心理分析?或許我該說是NYY認為投資小王
01/21 11:52, 89F

01/21 11:53, , 90F
風險太大?有太多的想法,只是礙於推文,我想要濃縮
01/21 11:53, 90F

01/21 11:53, , 91F
一下丟出一句罷了,說我在分析,我還真不敢當
01/21 11:53, 91F

01/21 11:54, , 92F
繞了162圈你根本還是不懂人家的意思.....怪啥風氣
01/21 11:54, 92F

01/21 11:54, , 93F
就這樣啦,看完的板友很感謝你們,沒看完的也沒問題
01/21 11:54, 93F

01/21 11:54, , 94F
理不理解是個人的事了,謝謝~
01/21 11:54, 94F

01/21 11:57, , 95F
我懂啊,以立基點來說拿小王跟Gaudin比確實不一定合
01/21 11:57, 95F

01/21 11:57, , 96F
適合啊,不過以不專業球迷的想法,什麼都可以拿來比
01/21 11:57, 96F

01/21 11:58, , 97F
較的不是嗎?不過我不確定你是不是懂我的意思就是
01/21 11:58, 97F

01/21 12:00, , 98F
想用哀兵之姿偷酸"專業球迷"就說啦~
01/21 12:00, 98F

01/21 12:03, , 99F
不是每個人都像你講的那麼有心機,這件事我不再回了
01/21 12:03, 99F

01/21 12:07, , 100F
整個推文就看你在扣人家帽子然後哭說被扣帽子
01/21 12:07, 100F

01/21 12:08, , 101F
謝謝你也幫我戴了一頂 你自己都說是不恰當的比較了
01/21 12:08, 101F

01/21 12:09, , 102F
會怕就好
01/21 12:09, 102F

01/21 12:09, , 103F
結果回一堆 扯什麼版風 提王就該死 什麼專不專業的
01/21 12:09, 103F

01/21 12:09, , 104F
洋基板真是超專業,可以到其他比較溫暖的板
01/21 12:09, 104F

01/21 12:11, , 105F
是啊,超怕的,不過我還是會照來..
01/21 12:11, 105F

01/21 12:13, , 106F
...
01/21 12:13, 106F

01/21 12:16, , 107F
印象-->心理-->數據-->口氣-->態度-->印象..........
01/21 12:16, 107F

01/21 12:20, , 108F
jackselina板友警告一次 在這篇的討論激盪中
01/21 12:20, 108F

01/21 12:21, , 109F
你明顯是用詞較激烈且易引起對立的 請注意發言
01/21 12:21, 109F

01/21 15:10, , 110F
心理分析不但了解別人的心理,也願分析自己的心理讓大
01/21 15:10, 110F

01/21 15:10, , 111F
家了解...真強...
01/21 15:10, 111F

01/21 15:43, , 112F
夠了,到此為止。若要針對原文討論,請另行回文。
01/21 15:43, 112F
文章代碼(AID): #1BLH2hZf (NY-Yankees)