[Wang] Wang deserves a better review

看板NY-Yankees作者 (Hung)時間16年前 (2007/12/13 07:25), 編輯推噓22(22016)
留言38則, 15人參與, 最新討論串1/1
http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2007/12/12/wang-deserves-a-better-review/ It’s interesting how 5.2 innings against Cleveland in October turned Chien-Ming Wang into a bum in the eyes of some. Andy Pettitte went to bat for the Wanger today. But many comments and e-mail disagreed. One guy wrote to tell me that “Wang had a terrible second half.” Well, he was 10-3, 4.07 after the break, 3-1, 3.27 in September. Another e-mailer (presumably somebody taking a break from their afternoon six-pack in Boston), wrote to say how Beckett “is twice as good as Wang.” Beckett was 20-7, 3.27; Wang was 19-7, 3.70. That’s twice as good? Is Beckett better than Wang? He was in 2007. He wasn’t in 2006. Wang will be entering only his third full season in the majors in 2008 and for the first time will be using more than two pitches on a regular basis. Can we wait a bit before deciding what he is or isn’t? Wang, I think, is a victim of himself. He’s quiet, unemotional and rarely does televised interviews because he speaks English as a second language. He also isn’t a strikeout pitcher. If Wang threw more four-seam fastballs, struck out a few more scrubs and pumped his fist once in a while, I suspect people would like him more. It’s kind of silly. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 192.149.109.55

12/13 07:37, , 1F
真high耶,"王的二倍強"
12/13 07:37, 1F

12/13 07:38, , 2F
我論這篇被戰起來的可能性…
12/13 07:38, 2F

12/13 07:39, , 3F
洋基板應該還好吧@@~不過在MLB版應該有的玩
12/13 07:39, 3F

12/13 07:41, , 4F
看下面的推文也是很不錯 很多人都give Wang credit
12/13 07:41, 4F

12/13 07:42, , 5F
2F講的中肯!
12/13 07:42, 5F

12/13 08:28, , 6F
胖子也滿挺小王的
12/13 08:28, 6F

12/13 10:10, , 7F
講的很中肯 拿貝基特和王比的確有所不公
12/13 10:10, 7F

12/13 10:11, , 8F
但貝基特"目前"的成績比王還優秀也的確是事實
12/13 10:11, 8F

12/13 10:12, , 9F
也沒人說王比貝基特好阿
12/13 10:12, 9F

12/13 10:39, , 10F
說王比貝基特好的人,可能眼睛不只到需要戴眼鏡的狀態
12/13 10:39, 10F

12/13 11:02, , 11F
只能說"今年"Beckett比王好 去年可不是這樣 明年也不一定
12/13 11:02, 11F

12/13 11:06, , 12F
今年的Beckett成功的把stuff轉換成實績,其實一直以來
12/13 11:06, 12F

12/13 11:06, , 13F
他的K/BB比都很棒,只是一直被水泡問題困擾
12/13 11:06, 13F

12/13 11:06, , 14F
如果能真正克服這個問題,明年成績不會"不一定"到哪去
12/13 11:06, 14F

12/13 11:08, , 15F
去年Beckett K/bb退化的很恐怖就是了...
12/13 11:08, 15F

12/13 11:09, , 16F
去年他真的就是手指起水泡起了一整年 硬幹一整年
12/13 11:09, 16F

12/13 11:10, , 17F
今年不就又回來了嗎?(煙)
12/13 11:10, 17F

12/13 11:30, , 18F
beckett手指起水泡起了一整年這消息那來的??
12/13 11:30, 18F

12/13 11:32, , 19F
我看THT說北極今年mechanical改善許多 倒沒提blister耶
12/13 11:32, 19F

12/13 11:33, , 20F
"今年"mechanical改善很多,"今年"沒有起水泡
12/13 11:33, 20F

12/13 11:37, , 21F
我是不相信他去年手指沒事,球路品質幾乎都有下降
12/13 11:37, 21F

12/13 11:38, , 22F
"今年"沒有起水泡??
12/13 11:38, 22F

12/13 11:39, , 23F
我是不知道有沒有耶,以往年年都會因為那個進出DL
12/13 11:39, 23F

12/13 11:40, , 24F
今年沒什麼印象
12/13 11:40, 24F

12/13 11:44, , 25F
就說了"手指起水泡起了一整年硬幹一年"那來的??
12/13 11:44, 25F

12/13 11:45, , 26F
我是聽說他在06年因為水泡的關係影響投球很大
12/13 11:45, 26F

12/13 11:45, , 27F
THT對beckett06烙賽 關係blister隻字未提
12/13 11:45, 27F

12/13 11:45, , 28F
red大真是stuff魔人~可是我雞排都吃完了 還是不懂你們꘠
12/13 11:45, 28F

12/13 11:47, , 29F
喔是喔,好吧,那算我消息錯誤 抱歉
12/13 11:47, 29F

12/13 11:47, , 30F
到底在討論的是什麼???
12/13 11:47, 30F

12/13 11:47, , 31F
就是為什麼Beckett去年丟的很差
12/13 11:47, 31F

12/13 11:52, , 32F
不過說真的我不太相信單純mechanical的差別會造成這麼
12/13 11:52, 32F

12/13 11:52, , 33F
瞭解~~去年給人的"感覺"是因為水泡問題影響控球
12/13 11:52, 33F

12/13 11:52, , 34F
巨大的影響
12/13 11:52, 34F

12/13 11:52, , 35F
不過水泡到底是不是北極的老問題就不得而知了
12/13 11:52, 35F

12/13 11:53, , 36F
如果是那表示今年手突然不會起水泡?還是怎樣就不清楚了
12/13 11:53, 36F

12/13 16:03, , 37F
這篇也滿挺小王的啊
12/13 16:03, 37F

12/13 19:00, , 38F
投手起水泡不是很正常?小王指甲還不是黑掉過
12/13 19:00, 38F
文章代碼(AID): #17O6tmct (NY-Yankees)