[試題] 100上 徐斯勤 美國外交政策 期末考

看板NTU-Exam作者 (FIRE_Honda_PEACE)時間12年前 (2012/01/18 09:45), 編輯推噓1(101)
留言2則, 2人參與, 最新討論串1/1
課程名稱︰美國外交政策 課程性質︰選修 課程教師︰徐斯勤 開課學院:社會科學院 開課系所︰政治系 考試日期(年月日)︰2012.01.13 考試時限(分鐘):130分鐘(3:30-5:40) 是否需發放獎勵金:是 (如未明確表示,則不予發放) 試題 : Please answer all of the following questions: (Hint for allocating your time strategically in the exam─The number of minutes you spend on ansewring a question should be roughly equal to the percentage that the question accounts for in the overall score.) 1. What did the Clinton Administration do on the following issues, and which grand strategy can best explain the U.S. policy in each of the following issues, and why (in your anser, please try to include as much as you can the overall objectives and concrete measures advocated by the grand strategy you choose, and the actual impacts of the Clinton Administrartion's behaviors)? (1)To cope with its relations with great powers.(14%) (2)To handle local conflicts in different regions of the world.(14%) 2. (1)Im America Unbounded, the authors suggest that one of President George W. Bush's worldview on foreign policy is "ABC." Do you think Neta Crawford would agree with this perspective or not, and why?(14%) (2)A critic of the U.S. foreign policy has recently suggested that if the strategy of the allegedly preemptive war (as defined by Bush) were to be faithfully practiced, it should have been North Korea rather than Iraq against which the U.S. waged a war. Do you agree with this statement? Please refer to the realities/conduct of North Korea and Iraq, and the concept of preemptive war to explain why.(14%) 3. Given what you have learned about the Obama Administration's foreign policy: (1)Please choose any specific example in the actual conduct of Obama's foreign policy, EITHER to show how the example is typical of a particular grand strategy (i.e., neo-isolationism, or selective engagement, or cooperative security, or primacy), OR to show how the example is apparently antithetical to a particualr grand strategy.(14%) (2)Would you consider Obama to demostrate the "transformational leadership" that Joseph Nye speaks of? Why? Please be sure to refer to the actual conduct in his foreign policy.(14%) 4. Would you consider Prisident George W. Bush's handling of the U.S. relations with China to be more in agreement with the "positive-sum" or "zero-sum" view identified by Thomas Christensen, and Why? Please be sure to refer to the key realities based on David Lampton's discussion.(16%) -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.112.211.97 ※ 編輯: w8742790 來自: 140.112.211.97 (01/18 09:46) ※ 編輯: w8742790 來自: 140.112.249.59 (01/18 11:59)

01/18 12:22, , 1F
你來賺甚麼P幣啦!!
01/18 12:22, 1F

01/18 23:07, , 2F
你們都不發只好(茶~~
01/18 23:07, 2F
文章代碼(AID): #1F5YHN9V (NTU-Exam)