[轉錄]0411演講公告@清大統研所

看板NTHU_STAT96作者 (Carlos C.)時間17年前 (2008/04/08 19:19), 編輯推噓5(501)
留言6則, 3人參與, 最新討論串1/1
清華大學、交通大學 統 計 學 研 究 所 專 題 演 講 題 目: Validity and reliability of preprocessing and differential expression combinations for Affymetrix GeneChip microarrays 主講人: 黃冠華 教授 (交通大學統計所) 時 間: 97年4月11日(星期五)10:40 - 11:30 (上午10:20-10:40茶會於統計所821室舉行) 地 點: 清大綜合三館837室 Abstract Microarray technology has been widely used for several years and a large number of computational analysis tools have been developed. We focus on the most popular platform, Affymetrix GeneChip arrays. Despite the rich research on selecting the optimal method of preprocessing and/or differential expression, this paper is unique in the following aspects. First, we have explored the best combination of preprocessing and differential expression methods. Second, we have evaluated both validity (accuracy) and reliability (reproducibility) on a variety of datasets with distinct characteristics. Third, we have compared stochastic-model-based and physical-mode-based preprocessing algorithms and gene-specific and empirical-Bayes’ differential expression detection. To evaluate which combinations of preprocessing and differential expression methods perform well, we considered 4 popular preprocessing methods (MAS 5.0, RMA, dChip and PDNN) and 5 popular differential expression methods (fold-change, two sample t-test, SAM, EBarrays and limma). We used three spike-in datasets to assess the validity, and ROC curves were used for the evaluation. To evaluate the reliability, we used another dataset from the MAQC project, which was generated using samples hybridized to Affymetrix platform at two different test sites. Overlap rates between two test sites were compared. I have found that validity was more sensitive to preprocessing methods, whereas reliability was more sensitive to differential expression methods. Considering both validity and reliability, six combinations were recommended when a small percentage of the genes were differentially expressed: RMA+fold-change, RMA+SAM, RMA+limma, PDNN+fold-change, PDNN+SAM and PDNN+limma. Three combinations were recommended when the percentage of differentially expressed genes was large: dChip(PM-only)+fold-change, dChip(PM-only)+SAM and dChip(PM-only)+limma. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.114.34.66 ※ 編輯: carloscc 來自: 140.114.34.66 (04/08 19:20)

04/09 00:40, , 1F
一起GO吧! 尤其是胖威寶 你一篇心得都還沒寫 一定要去
04/09 00:40, 1F

04/09 04:51, , 2F
GO 阿 我可不想延畢
04/09 04:51, 2F

04/09 04:56, , 3F
沒出現 請研究室的人喝飲料 星期五下午
04/09 04:56, 3F

04/09 06:37, , 4F
待會吃早餐不要不出現阿 樓上~~~~
04/09 06:37, 4F

04/09 06:53, , 5F
我又不是威寶 這麼不值得信任
04/09 06:53, 5F

04/09 07:18, , 6F
有沒有這麼早推文的八卦
04/09 07:18, 6F
文章代碼(AID): #17-rJFbq (NTHU_STAT96)