[閒聊] 看過最扯的Note?
我想大家丟撿球員多少會參考近期的note吧
不知道各位看過最扯的note是誰的?
我個人的話 這季最扯的就是KK跟Kanter了
KK這季的Note根本就是腦粉
爆胎的時候 就直接神隱不更新
雜魚數據 就still worth holding
難得一場恢復上季水準(還不是爆發喔) 就The patience is paying off
我真的被這個寫note的混帳害慘了 抓到14周才丟
另一個就是Kanter 他則是不管打怎樣 一律跟你說這隻不推
11分17板 he's only a low-end asset
18分12板 he’s nothing more than a late-round guy
11投全中 it still kept him outside of the top 100
13分10板 Give him a look if you simply need points and boards 好勉為其難啊...
我真的很想知道這個寫Note的到底跟Kanter有什麼深仇大恨..
我並不是想說KK很爛或是Kanter很強 實際上當然是要看建隊方向
只是覺得這個Note也太偏頗了吧...好歹看rank講話啊
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.161.229.9
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA_Fantasy/M.1457855876.A.1F9.html
推
03/13 16:04, , 1F
03/13 16:04, 1F
推
03/13 16:11, , 2F
03/13 16:11, 2F
推
03/13 16:13, , 3F
03/13 16:13, 3F
推
03/13 16:26, , 4F
03/13 16:26, 4F
推
03/13 16:33, , 5F
03/13 16:33, 5F
→
03/13 16:33, , 6F
03/13 16:33, 6F
推
03/13 16:35, , 7F
03/13 16:35, 7F
推
03/13 17:12, , 8F
03/13 17:12, 8F
我想到上季的Smart Note也是把他捧到天上去 雷到季末還在捧...
※ 編輯: e2167471 (1.161.229.9), 03/13/2016 17:21:52
推
03/13 17:29, , 9F
03/13 17:29, 9F
推
03/13 17:35, , 10F
03/13 17:35, 10F
推
03/13 17:46, , 11F
03/13 17:46, 11F
→
03/13 17:46, , 12F
03/13 17:46, 12F
推
03/13 17:59, , 13F
03/13 17:59, 13F
推
03/13 18:07, , 14F
03/13 18:07, 14F
推
03/13 18:16, , 15F
03/13 18:16, 15F
推
03/13 18:33, , 16F
03/13 18:33, 16F
推
03/13 18:45, , 17F
03/13 18:45, 17F
推
03/13 19:01, , 18F
03/13 19:01, 18F
→
03/13 19:02, , 19F
03/13 19:02, 19F
→
03/13 19:02, , 20F
03/13 19:02, 20F
不瞞您說 Danny我也有 也是我怨念積蓄源之一 (2/2才丟)
不過那個用waiver撿我Danny的倒楣鬼 現在被他害到聯盟墊底
丟一隻球員直接少一個對手 想到這個倒也有點釋懷了
推
03/13 20:09, , 21F
03/13 20:09, 21F
推
03/13 20:49, , 22F
03/13 20:49, 22F
推
03/13 20:52, , 23F
03/13 20:52, 23F
推
03/13 21:07, , 24F
03/13 21:07, 24F
推
03/13 21:15, , 25F
03/13 21:15, 25F
推
03/13 21:56, , 26F
03/13 21:56, 26F
推
03/13 22:35, , 27F
03/13 22:35, 27F
推
03/13 22:47, , 28F
03/13 22:47, 28F
→
03/13 22:48, , 29F
03/13 22:48, 29F
→
03/13 22:48, , 30F
03/13 22:48, 30F
→
03/13 23:47, , 31F
03/13 23:47, 31F
→
03/13 23:47, , 32F
03/13 23:47, 32F
→
03/13 23:47, , 33F
03/13 23:47, 33F
推
03/13 23:47, , 34F
03/13 23:47, 34F
→
03/13 23:47, , 35F
03/13 23:47, 35F
推
03/14 00:48, , 36F
03/14 00:48, 36F
原則上是這樣沒錯 但兩邊五五波很難抉擇 心靈處於牆頭草狀態的時候
還是很容易被影響的 尤其有時候對球員會有不理性的愛(DG跟KK上季多神啊...)
※ 編輯: e2167471 (1.161.229.9), 03/14/2016 01:14:36
推
03/14 03:04, , 37F
03/14 03:04, 37F
→
03/14 03:04, , 38F
03/14 03:04, 38F
推
03/14 06:13, , 39F
03/14 06:13, 39F
→
03/14 06:14, , 40F
03/14 06:14, 40F
→
03/14 06:22, , 41F
03/14 06:22, 41F
→
03/14 06:23, , 42F
03/14 06:23, 42F
我現在覺得Kanter的Note應該就是你在寫吧
推
03/14 09:42, , 43F
03/14 09:42, 43F
推
03/14 13:14, , 44F
03/14 13:14, 44F
推
03/14 14:34, , 45F
03/14 14:34, 45F
※ 編輯: e2167471 (1.169.49.232), 03/14/2016 18:48:23
推
03/14 18:57, , 46F
03/14 18:57, 46F
→
03/14 18:57, , 47F
03/14 18:57, 47F
推
03/14 19:51, , 48F
03/14 19:51, 48F
推
03/14 20:40, , 49F
03/14 20:40, 49F
推
03/14 20:54, , 50F
03/14 20:54, 50F
→
03/14 20:54, , 51F
03/14 20:54, 51F
→
03/14 20:55, , 52F
03/14 20:55, 52F
→
03/14 20:55, , 53F
03/14 20:55, 53F
別激動 他是我室友XD
另外只提分板太偏頗 Kanter雙命中+失誤都是正戰力啊
只不過沒助攻沒雙防 不是主流建隊方向罷了 對某些人來說很好用啊 有玩DD更是
※ 編輯: e2167471 (1.169.49.232), 03/14/2016 22:27:12
推
03/14 22:29, , 54F
03/14 22:29, 54F
→
03/14 22:30, , 55F
03/14 22:30, 55F
沒錯 如果作為洗咖Kanter的確不值得期待
但是如果以week為單位 他的數據其實是很穩定的
※ 編輯: e2167471 (1.169.49.232), 03/14/2016 22:35:32
是說Kanter強不強本來就不是這篇文的主旨
只是說明明兩個rank差不多 KK都能被捧成這樣了 沒道理Kanter要被看衰成這樣啊XD
※ 編輯: e2167471 (1.169.49.232), 03/14/2016 22:40:27
推
03/15 06:09, , 56F
03/15 06:09, 56F
→
03/15 06:09, , 57F
03/15 06:09, 57F
→
03/15 06:09, , 58F
03/15 06:09, 58F
推
10/21 21:24, , 59F
10/21 21:24, 59F