明星賽後勇士把zaza先發改成替補
換成McGee了 似乎也收到一定的效果
勇士一直沒有正規吃長時間的C
就是Zaza Mcgee West在輪換
Zaza-策應好 護框不錯 進攻差
McGee-活動力好 進攻大好大壞 防守觀念差
West-各方面都穩定 但是老惹
以前先發陣容因為攻擊力強(KD SC KT)
所以擺策應型中鋒Zaza當作防守及擋人
如今反而全力擺在攻擊用McGee 重攻輕守的陣型
反而收到奇效
雖然目前這個陣型還沒跟一級強隊戰過(火 賽) 雖然大概要季後賽才打得到了
但是不是以現在來看 全衝攻擊還比平衡型陣容好?
雖然我一直覺得Mcgee適合當奇兵 但是這幾場季賽又覺得當穩定先發攻擊也很好
可否理性討論?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.228.74.9
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1520090232.A.8B0.html
推
03/03 23:18, , 1F
03/03 23:18, 1F
推
03/03 23:18, , 2F
03/03 23:18, 2F
推
03/03 23:21, , 3F
03/03 23:21, 3F
推
03/03 23:21, , 4F
03/03 23:21, 4F
推
03/03 23:23, , 5F
03/03 23:23, 5F
推
03/03 23:23, , 6F
03/03 23:23, 6F
→
03/03 23:23, , 7F
03/03 23:23, 7F
推
03/03 23:23, , 8F
03/03 23:23, 8F
推
03/03 23:24, , 9F
03/03 23:24, 9F
推
03/03 23:24, , 10F
03/03 23:24, 10F
推
03/03 23:27, , 11F
03/03 23:27, 11F
→
03/03 23:27, , 12F
03/03 23:27, 12F
推
03/03 23:28, , 13F
03/03 23:28, 13F
推
03/03 23:29, , 14F
03/03 23:29, 14F
→
03/03 23:29, , 15F
03/03 23:29, 15F
→
03/03 23:29, , 16F
03/03 23:29, 16F
推
03/03 23:29, , 17F
03/03 23:29, 17F
→
03/03 23:30, , 18F
03/03 23:30, 18F
→
03/03 23:30, , 19F
03/03 23:30, 19F
→
03/03 23:30, , 20F
03/03 23:30, 20F
推
03/03 23:30, , 21F
03/03 23:30, 21F
推
03/03 23:30, , 22F
03/03 23:30, 22F
推
03/03 23:31, , 23F
03/03 23:31, 23F
推
03/03 23:33, , 24F
03/03 23:33, 24F
→
03/03 23:34, , 25F
03/03 23:34, 25F
推
03/03 23:35, , 26F
03/03 23:35, 26F
推
03/03 23:38, , 27F
03/03 23:38, 27F
推
03/03 23:41, , 28F
03/03 23:41, 28F
推
03/03 23:43, , 29F
03/03 23:43, 29F
推
03/03 23:44, , 30F
03/03 23:44, 30F
→
03/03 23:48, , 31F
03/03 23:48, 31F
推
03/03 23:49, , 32F
03/03 23:49, 32F
→
03/03 23:49, , 33F
03/03 23:49, 33F
推
03/03 23:52, , 34F
03/03 23:52, 34F
→
03/03 23:52, , 35F
03/03 23:52, 35F
推
03/03 23:54, , 36F
03/03 23:54, 36F
→
03/03 23:58, , 37F
03/03 23:58, 37F
推
03/04 00:08, , 38F
03/04 00:08, 38F
推
03/04 00:12, , 39F
03/04 00:12, 39F
→
03/04 00:25, , 40F
03/04 00:25, 40F
→
03/04 00:26, , 41F
03/04 00:26, 41F
推
03/04 00:28, , 42F
03/04 00:28, 42F
推
03/04 00:42, , 43F
03/04 00:42, 43F
推
03/04 00:51, , 44F
03/04 00:51, 44F
推
03/04 00:56, , 45F
03/04 00:56, 45F
→
03/04 01:04, , 46F
03/04 01:04, 46F
→
03/04 01:04, , 47F
03/04 01:04, 47F
噓
03/04 01:20, , 48F
03/04 01:20, 48F
推
03/04 01:23, , 49F
03/04 01:23, 49F
推
03/04 01:41, , 50F
03/04 01:41, 50F
推
03/04 02:12, , 51F
03/04 02:12, 51F
推
03/04 02:34, , 52F
03/04 02:34, 52F
→
03/04 02:40, , 53F
03/04 02:40, 53F
→
03/04 02:40, , 54F
03/04 02:40, 54F
噓
03/04 02:53, , 55F
03/04 02:53, 55F
推
03/04 02:57, , 56F
03/04 02:57, 56F
推
03/04 03:04, , 57F
03/04 03:04, 57F
推
03/04 03:37, , 58F
03/04 03:37, 58F
→
03/04 04:05, , 59F
03/04 04:05, 59F
推
03/04 06:08, , 60F
03/04 06:08, 60F
推
03/04 06:45, , 61F
03/04 06:45, 61F
推
03/04 07:18, , 62F
03/04 07:18, 62F
→
03/04 07:41, , 63F
03/04 07:41, 63F
推
03/04 08:22, , 64F
03/04 08:22, 64F
→
03/04 08:27, , 65F
03/04 08:27, 65F
推
03/04 08:43, , 66F
03/04 08:43, 66F
→
03/04 08:43, , 67F
03/04 08:43, 67F
推
03/04 09:02, , 68F
03/04 09:02, 68F
推
03/04 09:03, , 69F
03/04 09:03, 69F
推
03/04 09:40, , 70F
03/04 09:40, 70F
推
03/04 10:23, , 71F
03/04 10:23, 71F
推
03/04 10:57, , 72F
03/04 10:57, 72F
推
03/04 11:19, , 73F
03/04 11:19, 73F
推
03/04 11:58, , 74F
03/04 11:58, 74F
推
03/04 12:21, , 75F
03/04 12:21, 75F
推
03/04 13:34, , 76F
03/04 13:34, 76F
推
03/04 13:54, , 77F
03/04 13:54, 77F