[討論] 中距離真的是低效率得分手段嗎?
看過一些關於籃下、中距離、三分的比較,中距離被認為效率低下
像是中距離因為命中率遠不如同樣是2分的籃下
而期望值又不如三分(依本人貧弱的數學計算中距離45%,三分只要30%便可打平)
之前聽說像是火箭隊因為效率,大部分都投籃下跟三分,中距離很少
剛去查Harden才發現他今年將近一半出手是三分線有點嚇到
又去查Curry發現他已經連2季三分出手超過總出手一半
但是很多已經退休的著名得分手,中距離好像都是他們強大的武器
比如喬丹,郵差,老大等等
現役的話,像是Durant,Leonard,Nowitzki得分也蠻多來自中距離的
而且刻意不投中距離,等於自斷臂膀,防守者更好針對不是嗎
只要不要一直投三分線前一步的long two,把中距離範圍限定在罰球線前後就還好吧
而且體力下降的話,投籃距離越遠會越不穩,切入破壞力應該也會降低
這時候中距離可以算是不錯的投籃選擇吧? 中距離應該還是不錯的得分手段吧
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 219.70.210.39
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1502292818.A.F5D.html
→
08/09 23:34, , 1F
08/09 23:34, 1F
→
08/09 23:35, , 2F
08/09 23:35, 2F
推
08/09 23:35, , 3F
08/09 23:35, 3F
→
08/09 23:35, , 4F
08/09 23:35, 4F
→
08/09 23:35, , 5F
08/09 23:35, 5F
推
08/09 23:37, , 6F
08/09 23:37, 6F
我覺得每個人習慣的得分手段不同 可能他覺得投中距離比較有把握 說中距離低效怪怪的
推
08/09 23:37, , 7F
08/09 23:37, 7F
推
08/09 23:39, , 8F
08/09 23:39, 8F
推
08/09 23:39, , 9F
08/09 23:39, 9F
→
08/09 23:39, , 10F
08/09 23:39, 10F
推
08/09 23:39, , 11F
08/09 23:39, 11F
推
08/09 23:40, , 12F
08/09 23:40, 12F
噓
08/09 23:40, , 13F
08/09 23:40, 13F
噓
08/09 23:40, , 14F
08/09 23:40, 14F
推
08/09 23:41, , 15F
08/09 23:41, 15F
推
08/09 23:42, , 16F
08/09 23:42, 16F
推
08/09 23:42, , 17F
08/09 23:42, 17F
推
08/09 23:42, , 18F
08/09 23:42, 18F
推
08/09 23:42, , 19F
08/09 23:42, 19F
→
08/09 23:43, , 20F
08/09 23:43, 20F
→
08/09 23:43, , 21F
08/09 23:43, 21F
→
08/09 23:44, , 22F
08/09 23:44, 22F
推
08/09 23:44, , 23F
08/09 23:44, 23F
→
08/09 23:45, , 24F
08/09 23:45, 24F
→
08/09 23:46, , 25F
08/09 23:46, 25F
可是好像一些球員的中距離真的算蠻少的
※ 編輯: leo755269 (219.70.210.39), 08/09/2017 23:48:21
推
08/09 23:47, , 26F
08/09 23:47, 26F
推
08/09 23:56, , 27F
08/09 23:56, 27F
→
08/09 23:57, , 28F
08/09 23:57, 28F
這假設有點怪怪的 A大說的沒錯 但是中距離好的人不代表不投三分 而且通常有一定水準
推
08/09 23:57, , 29F
08/09 23:57, 29F
推
08/09 23:57, , 30F
08/09 23:57, 30F
推
08/09 23:58, , 31F
08/09 23:58, 31F
→
08/09 23:58, , 32F
08/09 23:58, 32F
→
08/09 23:58, , 33F
08/09 23:58, 33F
推
08/10 00:00, , 34F
08/10 00:00, 34F
推
08/10 00:01, , 35F
08/10 00:01, 35F
噓
08/10 00:02, , 36F
08/10 00:02, 36F
還有 413 則推文
還有 4 段內文
推
08/10 10:37, , 450F
08/10 10:37, 450F
→
08/10 10:37, , 451F
08/10 10:37, 451F
→
08/10 10:38, , 452F
08/10 10:38, 452F
→
08/10 10:39, , 453F
08/10 10:39, 453F
→
08/10 10:39, , 454F
08/10 10:39, 454F
→
08/10 10:40, , 455F
08/10 10:40, 455F
→
08/10 10:40, , 456F
08/10 10:40, 456F
→
08/10 10:40, , 457F
08/10 10:40, 457F
→
08/10 10:41, , 458F
08/10 10:41, 458F
→
08/10 11:00, , 459F
08/10 11:00, 459F
噓
08/10 11:45, , 460F
08/10 11:45, 460F
推
08/10 12:01, , 461F
08/10 12:01, 461F
→
08/10 12:03, , 462F
08/10 12:03, 462F
推
08/10 12:17, , 463F
08/10 12:17, 463F
推
08/10 12:23, , 464F
08/10 12:23, 464F
推
08/10 12:25, , 465F
08/10 12:25, 465F
推
08/10 12:26, , 466F
08/10 12:26, 466F
→
08/10 12:26, , 467F
08/10 12:26, 467F
→
08/10 12:26, , 468F
08/10 12:26, 468F
推
08/10 12:27, , 469F
08/10 12:27, 469F
推
08/10 12:42, , 470F
08/10 12:42, 470F
推
08/10 12:44, , 471F
08/10 12:44, 471F
噓
08/10 13:07, , 472F
08/10 13:07, 472F
推
08/10 13:10, , 473F
08/10 13:10, 473F
→
08/10 13:11, , 474F
08/10 13:11, 474F
→
08/10 13:12, , 475F
08/10 13:12, 475F
推
08/10 13:35, , 476F
08/10 13:35, 476F
推
08/10 14:53, , 477F
08/10 14:53, 477F
→
08/10 14:53, , 478F
08/10 14:53, 478F
→
08/10 14:54, , 479F
08/10 14:54, 479F
→
08/10 16:23, , 480F
08/10 16:23, 480F
推
08/10 16:53, , 481F
08/10 16:53, 481F
推
08/10 17:39, , 482F
08/10 17:39, 482F
推
08/10 17:54, , 483F
08/10 17:54, 483F
推
08/10 21:43, , 484F
08/10 21:43, 484F
→
08/10 21:43, , 485F
08/10 21:43, 485F
推
08/11 07:23, , 486F
08/11 07:23, 486F
推
08/12 08:34, , 487F
08/12 08:34, 487F
→
08/12 08:35, , 488F
08/12 08:35, 488F
→
08/12 08:35, , 489F
08/12 08:35, 489F