[討論] 為何都不討論melo的防守
板上很愛戰甜瓜進攻 自幹
但瓜瓜進攻不是本來就不需要質疑嗎!?
瓜最大的問題是態度吧
但一直沒提melo的防守
是不值一提還是水準之上呢?
舉凡目前一線SF
LBJ KD 可愛 PG
無一不是防守好手
甚至年度防守第一隊
追魂鍋 神抄截 樣樣來
可以說SF這個點防守重要性並不亞於進攻
如果沒防守 那真的別想打冠軍戰了
勇士在KD來之前
IGGY也可以說是用防守拿了一座FMVP
那撇除態度問題
Melo防守端到底好不好呢?
這才是比melo進攻好不好值得討論吧
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 223.141.248.7
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1499099267.A.C24.html
推
07/04 00:28, , 1F
07/04 00:28, 1F
→
07/04 00:28, , 2F
07/04 00:28, 2F
※ 編輯: adsl7749 (223.141.248.7), 07/04/2017 00:29:12
推
07/04 00:30, , 3F
07/04 00:30, 3F
噓
07/04 00:30, , 4F
07/04 00:30, 4F
所以瓜瓜防守好不好呢?
※ 編輯: adsl7749 (223.141.248.7), 07/04/2017 00:31:26
推
07/04 00:31, , 5F
07/04 00:31, 5F
噓
07/04 00:31, , 6F
07/04 00:31, 6F
推
07/04 00:31, , 7F
07/04 00:31, 7F
之前melo當一哥 難道只要他進攻? 只要進攻 那當板凳就好不是?
※ 編輯: adsl7749 (223.141.248.7), 07/04/2017 00:32:54
→
07/04 00:32, , 8F
07/04 00:32, 8F
→
07/04 00:32, , 9F
07/04 00:32, 9F
→
07/04 00:32, , 10F
07/04 00:32, 10F
推
07/04 00:32, , 11F
07/04 00:32, 11F
推
07/04 00:33, , 12F
07/04 00:33, 12F
→
07/04 00:33, , 13F
07/04 00:33, 13F
推
07/04 00:33, , 14F
07/04 00:33, 14F
→
07/04 00:34, , 15F
07/04 00:34, 15F
→
07/04 00:34, , 16F
07/04 00:34, 16F
→
07/04 00:34, , 17F
07/04 00:34, 17F
我們在講這季以前 是轉去騎士了嗎 詹迷?
推
07/04 00:35, , 18F
07/04 00:35, 18F
推
07/04 00:35, , 19F
07/04 00:35, 19F
※ 編輯: adsl7749 (223.141.248.7), 07/04/2017 00:36:01
推
07/04 00:36, , 20F
07/04 00:36, 20F
推
07/04 00:37, , 21F
07/04 00:37, 21F
→
07/04 00:37, , 22F
07/04 00:37, 22F
推
07/04 00:38, , 23F
07/04 00:38, 23F
照推文所說 就是爛 無異議?
※ 編輯: adsl7749 (223.141.248.7), 07/04/2017 00:38:50
噓
07/04 00:38, , 24F
07/04 00:38, 24F
→
07/04 00:39, , 25F
07/04 00:39, 25F
推
07/04 00:39, , 26F
07/04 00:39, 26F
→
07/04 00:39, , 27F
07/04 00:39, 27F
那你屁話不用那麼多 那麼懂瓜 告訴我他防守好不好 誰在跟你談進攻 毫無邏輯可言
※ 編輯: adsl7749 (223.141.248.7), 07/04/2017 00:41:59
→
07/04 00:41, , 28F
07/04 00:41, 28F
→
07/04 00:41, , 29F
07/04 00:41, 29F
噓
07/04 00:41, , 30F
07/04 00:41, 30F
→
07/04 00:42, , 31F
07/04 00:42, 31F
※ 編輯: adsl7749 (223.141.248.7), 07/04/2017 00:42:38
還有 154 則推文
→
07/04 01:53, , 186F
07/04 01:53, 186F
推
07/04 01:54, , 187F
07/04 01:54, 187F
→
07/04 01:55, , 188F
07/04 01:55, 188F
推
07/04 01:56, , 189F
07/04 01:56, 189F
推
07/04 01:58, , 190F
07/04 01:58, 190F
→
07/04 01:58, , 191F
07/04 01:58, 191F
→
07/04 01:58, , 192F
07/04 01:58, 192F
推
07/04 01:58, , 193F
07/04 01:58, 193F
推
07/04 02:01, , 194F
07/04 02:01, 194F
→
07/04 02:02, , 195F
07/04 02:02, 195F
推
07/04 02:03, , 196F
07/04 02:03, 196F
推
07/04 02:05, , 197F
07/04 02:05, 197F
→
07/04 02:06, , 198F
07/04 02:06, 198F
推
07/04 04:16, , 199F
07/04 04:16, 199F
推
07/04 04:55, , 200F
07/04 04:55, 200F
噓
07/04 07:03, , 201F
07/04 07:03, 201F
推
07/04 07:11, , 202F
07/04 07:11, 202F
噓
07/04 07:45, , 203F
07/04 07:45, 203F
推
07/04 07:54, , 204F
07/04 07:54, 204F
→
07/04 07:54, , 205F
07/04 07:54, 205F
噓
07/04 08:09, , 206F
07/04 08:09, 206F
→
07/04 08:09, , 207F
07/04 08:09, 207F
推
07/04 08:33, , 208F
07/04 08:33, 208F
→
07/04 08:33, , 209F
07/04 08:33, 209F
→
07/04 08:33, , 210F
07/04 08:33, 210F
→
07/04 08:33, , 211F
07/04 08:33, 211F
噓
07/04 08:43, , 212F
07/04 08:43, 212F
→
07/04 08:44, , 213F
07/04 08:44, 213F
噓
07/04 09:15, , 214F
07/04 09:15, 214F
→
07/04 09:15, , 215F
07/04 09:15, 215F
噓
07/04 09:21, , 216F
07/04 09:21, 216F
推
07/04 09:59, , 217F
07/04 09:59, 217F
→
07/04 10:00, , 218F
07/04 10:00, 218F
推
07/04 10:00, , 219F
07/04 10:00, 219F
→
07/04 10:00, , 220F
07/04 10:00, 220F
噓
07/04 10:04, , 221F
07/04 10:04, 221F
噓
07/04 10:04, , 222F
07/04 10:04, 222F
噓
07/04 10:25, , 223F
07/04 10:25, 223F
推
07/04 10:55, , 224F
07/04 10:55, 224F
推
07/04 18:57, , 225F
07/04 18:57, 225F