[討論] 騎士是否應該犧牲季賽成績勤練替補
騎士今年的陣容雖然豪華,老實說我覺得天份絕對不輸勇士,
但是實際上到了季後賽就是8人輪替,
說八人可能還太多,香波算一個,帥哥可能只能算0.75個,小胖大概0.25吧
重點是小胖跟KK這一季來騎士之前還沒有這麼不堪,完全都是可用之兵,
騎士的間歇性防守加上關鍵式漏人就不說了,想談談進攻,
有打過籃球的都知道,進攻的連結雖然主要靠戰術,
但還是有很多是需要知道隊友彼此的習慣,才能在讓隊友在sweet zone接到球,
讓我們先來看看勇士,
勇士這一季除了先發在磨合之外,花最多心力的就是第二陣容的磨合了,
大部分隊伍的第二節陣容多半是把每個位置的一號替補拉上來,
勇士的二四節首發在這一季一開始也是,走的是小AI-Liv-D.West-賣機配上KT
但是這樣的陣容投射非常的差,也不太有辦法幫彼此拉出空間,
大約過了40場之後才磨合出新的陣容,KT-Green-Clark-West-Iggy
然後把Liv定位在組織的磨合劑和Curry的替補,而不是第二陣容的攻擊者
把賣機訂位在第一節末段的護框和戰術使用,讓嘴綠跟Zaza可以下去,
這樣的陣容也是經過了快半季的第二節當機才磨練出來的
我認為這才是好好的使用老將及功能性球員的方法,
騎士其實有很多有經驗或是功能性的球員,
卻從來沒有組成一個有效率第二陣容,
在我看來騎士替補在季賽上來就是單純照戰術打球,這還不打緊,
等到季後賽變成8人輪替的時候,只要先發配上替補,
能用的那三人突然都不敢觸球,不敢跑空切也不太會找投籃空檔,
私以為這是平常這八人的混搭組合打得太少了,再加上大賽壓力,磨合不足的缺點立刻體
現,
老實說不能怪喇叭只會坦克切或是KI不會流動球,而是整個賽季的磨合都沒有誕生出一個
良好輪轉的第二陣容(再次強調,第二陣容不一定都要是替補),變成隊員上場都做自己
的工作,而不是幫整個團隊找到突破點,畢竟籃球又不是一人運動
你看看勇勇的新秀McCaw,在封王戰也打能擺進四分,不可能小胖會一分未得
反正只要有LBJ跟KI在,就算是第八種子也能打進冠軍戰,
何不再更犧牲戰績來把八人陣容拓展成十人輪替,
這比起在1.3E薪資上還要補強來的實際多了
大家討論看看
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 203.71.94.31
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1497425905.A.351.html
推
06/14 15:40, , 1F
06/14 15:40, 1F
推
06/14 15:40, , 2F
06/14 15:40, 2F
推
06/14 15:41, , 3F
06/14 15:41, 3F
→
06/14 15:41, , 4F
06/14 15:41, 4F
推
06/14 15:41, , 5F
06/14 15:41, 5F
推
06/14 15:41, , 6F
06/14 15:41, 6F
→
06/14 15:42, , 7F
06/14 15:42, 7F
推
06/14 15:42, , 8F
06/14 15:42, 8F
→
06/14 15:42, , 9F
06/14 15:42, 9F
推
06/14 15:42, , 10F
06/14 15:42, 10F
推
06/14 15:42, , 11F
06/14 15:42, 11F
→
06/14 15:42, , 12F
06/14 15:42, 12F
推
06/14 15:42, , 13F
06/14 15:42, 13F
推
06/14 15:43, , 14F
06/14 15:43, 14F
推
06/14 15:43, , 15F
06/14 15:43, 15F
→
06/14 15:44, , 16F
06/14 15:44, 16F
→
06/14 15:44, , 17F
06/14 15:44, 17F
推
06/14 15:45, , 18F
06/14 15:45, 18F
→
06/14 15:45, , 19F
06/14 15:45, 19F
→
06/14 15:45, , 20F
06/14 15:45, 20F
→
06/14 15:45, , 21F
06/14 15:45, 21F
→
06/14 15:45, , 22F
06/14 15:45, 22F
推
06/14 15:46, , 23F
06/14 15:46, 23F
→
06/14 15:47, , 24F
06/14 15:47, 24F
→
06/14 15:48, , 25F
06/14 15:48, 25F
噓
06/14 15:49, , 26F
06/14 15:49, 26F
→
06/14 15:50, , 27F
06/14 15:50, 27F
→
06/14 15:51, , 28F
06/14 15:51, 28F
推
06/14 16:02, , 29F
06/14 16:02, 29F
推
06/14 16:05, , 30F
06/14 16:05, 30F
推
06/14 16:12, , 31F
06/14 16:12, 31F
→
06/14 16:12, , 32F
06/14 16:12, 32F
→
06/14 16:14, , 33F
06/14 16:14, 33F
→
06/14 16:14, , 34F
06/14 16:14, 34F
推
06/14 16:14, , 35F
06/14 16:14, 35F
→
06/14 16:16, , 36F
06/14 16:16, 36F
→
06/14 16:16, , 37F
06/14 16:16, 37F
噓
06/14 16:29, , 38F
06/14 16:29, 38F
→
06/14 16:29, , 39F
06/14 16:29, 39F
推
06/14 16:37, , 40F
06/14 16:37, 40F
推
06/14 16:41, , 41F
06/14 16:41, 41F
→
06/14 16:41, , 42F
06/14 16:41, 42F
推
06/14 16:50, , 43F
06/14 16:50, 43F
推
06/14 16:59, , 44F
06/14 16:59, 44F
推
06/14 17:14, , 45F
06/14 17:14, 45F
推
06/14 17:49, , 46F
06/14 17:49, 46F
→
06/14 17:49, , 47F
06/14 17:49, 47F
推
06/14 18:09, , 48F
06/14 18:09, 48F
→
06/14 18:09, , 49F
06/14 18:09, 49F
推
06/14 18:12, , 50F
06/14 18:12, 50F
推
06/14 18:19, , 51F
06/14 18:19, 51F
→
06/14 18:20, , 52F
06/14 18:20, 52F
→
06/14 18:20, , 53F
06/14 18:20, 53F
推
06/14 18:24, , 54F
06/14 18:24, 54F
→
06/14 18:24, , 55F
06/14 18:24, 55F
推
06/14 18:28, , 56F
06/14 18:28, 56F
→
06/14 18:28, , 57F
06/14 18:28, 57F
推
06/14 18:34, , 58F
06/14 18:34, 58F
推
06/14 18:57, , 59F
06/14 18:57, 59F
推
06/14 19:21, , 60F
06/14 19:21, 60F
推
06/14 19:49, , 61F
06/14 19:49, 61F
推
06/14 21:06, , 62F
06/14 21:06, 62F
推
06/14 21:42, , 63F
06/14 21:42, 63F
→
06/15 00:23, , 64F
06/15 00:23, 64F