[討論] zaza的關鍵犯規到底對誰不利?
第三節ZAZA這一腳,驚天地、泣鬼神。
連鬼禿都出來說,這個犯規改變整個戰局走勢。
“So, yeah, we struggled a lot without him, and it’s a tough break."
這個犯規看似幫助勇士撿到逆轉一勝,但是實際上呢?
犯規是比賽的一部分,由規則+裁判在現場畫下一條線。
------------------------------------------------------------------
"今天Zaza的這個動作,被歸類在正常的防守犯規。"
(根據板友 hbk3308 所言,文章代碼: #1P6QD6tb)
請特別注意,沒有被吹惡犯、沒有其餘逞處!
如果你是PoPo,你會怎麼應對?
最簡單的方式就是從拉替補上來輪流埋。
沒錯,很沒品。但是這在聯盟與裁判的認定:"只是個普通犯規"
------------------------------------------------------------------
進一步分析,這招能開,對勇士的威脅大還是對馬刺的威脅大?
以三分外圍火砲見長且為主力的勇士?
還是禁區與外線分配均衡的馬刺?
埋個curry、埋個Thompson、KD,勇士要怎麼打下去?
----
就把埋地雷這招視為跟駭客一樣,只是規則戰術的運用程度,
這點對聯盟、球星是利是弊?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.71.42.33
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1494858511.A.BF4.html
推
05/15 22:29, , 1F
05/15 22:29, 1F
→
05/15 22:29, , 2F
05/15 22:29, 2F
噓
05/15 22:30, , 3F
05/15 22:30, 3F
噓
05/15 22:30, , 4F
05/15 22:30, 4F
推
05/15 22:32, , 5F
05/15 22:32, 5F
噓
05/15 22:32, , 6F
05/15 22:32, 6F
推
05/15 22:33, , 7F
05/15 22:33, 7F
→
05/15 22:33, , 8F
05/15 22:33, 8F
→
05/15 22:33, , 9F
05/15 22:33, 9F
→
05/15 22:33, , 10F
05/15 22:33, 10F
推
05/15 22:34, , 11F
05/15 22:34, 11F
→
05/15 22:34, , 12F
05/15 22:34, 12F
→
05/15 22:34, , 13F
05/15 22:34, 13F
推
05/15 22:39, , 14F
05/15 22:39, 14F
→
05/15 22:40, , 15F
05/15 22:40, 15F
推
05/15 22:40, , 16F
05/15 22:40, 16F
![](https://i.imgur.com/WmflMmY.jpg)
推
05/15 22:40, , 17F
05/15 22:40, 17F
推
05/15 22:41, , 18F
05/15 22:41, 18F
推
05/15 22:42, , 19F
05/15 22:42, 19F
→
05/15 22:43, , 20F
05/15 22:43, 20F
推
05/15 22:44, , 21F
05/15 22:44, 21F
推
05/15 22:46, , 22F
05/15 22:46, 22F
推
05/15 22:50, , 23F
05/15 22:50, 23F
推
05/15 22:51, , 24F
05/15 22:51, 24F
→
05/15 22:51, , 25F
05/15 22:51, 25F
噓
05/15 22:52, , 26F
05/15 22:52, 26F
推
05/15 22:53, , 27F
05/15 22:53, 27F
推
05/15 22:55, , 28F
05/15 22:55, 28F
推
05/15 22:55, , 29F
05/15 22:55, 29F
推
05/15 22:56, , 30F
05/15 22:56, 30F
推
05/15 22:57, , 31F
05/15 22:57, 31F
推
05/15 22:57, , 32F
05/15 22:57, 32F
噓
05/15 23:02, , 33F
05/15 23:02, 33F
推
05/15 23:06, , 34F
05/15 23:06, 34F
噓
05/15 23:10, , 35F
05/15 23:10, 35F
→
05/15 23:10, , 36F
05/15 23:10, 36F
→
05/15 23:14, , 37F
05/15 23:14, 37F
→
05/15 23:14, , 38F
05/15 23:14, 38F
噓
05/15 23:14, , 39F
05/15 23:14, 39F
推
05/15 23:19, , 40F
05/15 23:19, 40F
→
05/15 23:20, , 41F
05/15 23:20, 41F
推
05/15 23:22, , 42F
05/15 23:22, 42F
→
05/15 23:24, , 43F
05/15 23:24, 43F
推
05/15 23:26, , 44F
05/15 23:26, 44F
推
05/15 23:28, , 45F
05/15 23:28, 45F
推
05/15 23:32, , 46F
05/15 23:32, 46F
噓
05/15 23:36, , 47F
05/15 23:36, 47F
噓
05/15 23:38, , 48F
05/15 23:38, 48F
推
05/15 23:40, , 49F
05/15 23:40, 49F
推
05/15 23:42, , 50F
05/15 23:42, 50F
→
05/15 23:45, , 51F
05/15 23:45, 51F
推
05/15 23:51, , 52F
05/15 23:51, 52F
→
05/16 00:04, , 53F
05/16 00:04, 53F
→
05/16 00:06, , 54F
05/16 00:06, 54F
推
05/16 00:22, , 55F
05/16 00:22, 55F
推
05/16 00:29, , 56F
05/16 00:29, 56F
噓
05/16 00:30, , 57F
05/16 00:30, 57F
→
05/16 00:31, , 58F
05/16 00:31, 58F
→
05/16 00:31, , 59F
05/16 00:31, 59F
噓
05/16 00:45, , 60F
05/16 00:45, 60F
→
05/16 01:13, , 61F
05/16 01:13, 61F
推
05/16 01:17, , 62F
05/16 01:17, 62F
推
05/16 01:22, , 63F
05/16 01:22, 63F
推
05/16 01:46, , 64F
05/16 01:46, 64F
→
05/16 01:46, , 65F
05/16 01:46, 65F
→
05/16 01:46, , 66F
05/16 01:46, 66F
推
05/16 02:18, , 67F
05/16 02:18, 67F
噓
05/16 02:41, , 68F
05/16 02:41, 68F
→
05/16 03:09, , 69F
05/16 03:09, 69F
→
05/16 03:09, , 70F
05/16 03:09, 70F
推
05/16 03:15, , 71F
05/16 03:15, 71F
→
05/16 03:15, , 72F
05/16 03:15, 72F
→
05/16 03:15, , 73F
05/16 03:15, 73F
推
05/16 03:19, , 74F
05/16 03:19, 74F
→
05/16 03:19, , 75F
05/16 03:19, 75F
→
05/16 03:19, , 76F
05/16 03:19, 76F
→
05/16 03:20, , 77F
05/16 03:20, 77F
→
05/16 03:20, , 78F
05/16 03:20, 78F
→
05/16 03:28, , 79F
05/16 03:28, 79F
噓
05/16 03:34, , 80F
05/16 03:34, 80F
推
05/16 07:50, , 81F
05/16 07:50, 81F
推
05/16 08:21, , 82F
05/16 08:21, 82F
噓
05/16 08:38, , 83F
05/16 08:38, 83F
→
05/16 08:57, , 84F
05/16 08:57, 84F
推
05/16 10:46, , 85F
05/16 10:46, 85F