[心得] 團隊籃球是馬刺唯一出路
Hi,各位朋友,好久不見,
過去包括筆者以及其他許多熱愛籃球的朋友,曾提出許多意見,可惜被刺迷們否決,
筆者是個懂得反省,檢討,思考的看球人士,對馬刺的了解當然比不上資深的專業刺迷,
所以筆者也做了很多筆記,整理***刺迷愛用說法***,也在此和各位分享:
1.若有頂級球星能打球星籃球,何必打團隊籃球?
2.雷納德已經毫無疑問是頂級球星
3.不可小看阿德里奇在馬刺隊的重要性,阿德里奇根本不軟,在馬刺愈打愈硬,
馬刺不能沒有他的關鍵防守
4.馬刺目前是半重建球隊,能有現在的成績已經很好
筆者想,今天這場比賽,能說明許多事,雖然還沒結束,但若能絕處逢生,
想必也是因為馬刺做了些許改變
首先,本場比賽再度證明雷納德和頂級球星仍有差距,單核的姆斯,單核的哈登,
甚至單核的杜蘭,單核的西河帶隊都不會出現如此情況,理想很豐滿,現實很骨感,
雷納德本就還不是頂級球星,暴量砍分,隻手遮天力挽狂瀾的本事還不夠,
第二,許多刺迷說馬刺不是單核,雙核,阿德里奇並不軟,他很硬,防守強,能投射,
可事實再度證明,今日的他各種被打點,連往日瘋狂護航吹捧的刺迷都開始說他,
在季後賽強度的比賽就是如此,已經多次證明他的不夠力,
綜合以上兩點,我們可以知道,現在的馬刺打球星籃球是沒有前途的,
必須了解到馬刺陣中的球星根本不足以打球星籃球,要想衝擊總冠軍,唯有回到團隊籃球,
回到當年用團隊籃球和熱火三王血戰到G7,用團隊籃球擊敗熱火三王的那種團隊才有希望,
當然,若繼續打球星籃球,繼續進行刺迷口中的半重建,
那筆者想,或許馬刺仍然可以繼續當所謂的"強隊",繼續保持連續N年50勝的紀錄,
繼續待在西區前四,但考量到馬刺保持這種成績的選秀順位,馬刺沒多少的薪資空間,
馬刺沒多少的球星吸引力,要拿總冠軍? no way
最後的下場就是年年季後賽常客,年年沒有總冠軍,筆者想,快艇,就是個很好的例子.
馬刺,是時候做出改變了,重拾團隊籃球吧
--
學歷: 德克薩斯州立大學奧斯丁分校體育理論碩士
指導教授: ☆Z貓☆喬尻☆尼安56☆中央貓☆
目前為台灣大學運動理論研究所副研究員
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 140.112.77.29
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1493693855.A.2A3.html
→
05/02 10:58, , 1F
05/02 10:58, 1F
推
05/02 10:58, , 2F
05/02 10:58, 2F
噓
05/02 10:59, , 3F
05/02 10:59, 3F
噓
05/02 10:59, , 4F
05/02 10:59, 4F
噓
05/02 11:02, , 5F
05/02 11:02, 5F
→
05/02 11:02, , 6F
05/02 11:02, 6F
推
05/02 11:03, , 7F
05/02 11:03, 7F
噓
05/02 11:03, , 8F
05/02 11:03, 8F
推
05/02 11:03, , 9F
05/02 11:03, 9F
→
05/02 11:03, , 10F
05/02 11:03, 10F
→
05/02 11:04, , 11F
05/02 11:04, 11F
噓
05/02 11:04, , 12F
05/02 11:04, 12F
推
05/02 11:04, , 13F
05/02 11:04, 13F
推
05/02 11:04, , 14F
05/02 11:04, 14F
推
05/02 11:04, , 15F
05/02 11:04, 15F
噓
05/02 11:05, , 16F
05/02 11:05, 16F
噓
05/02 11:05, , 17F
05/02 11:05, 17F
→
05/02 11:05, , 18F
05/02 11:05, 18F
推
05/02 11:05, , 19F
05/02 11:05, 19F
推
05/02 11:05, , 20F
05/02 11:05, 20F
噓
05/02 11:05, , 21F
05/02 11:05, 21F
→
05/02 11:06, , 22F
05/02 11:06, 22F
推
05/02 11:06, , 23F
05/02 11:06, 23F
噓
05/02 11:07, , 24F
05/02 11:07, 24F
→
05/02 11:07, , 25F
05/02 11:07, 25F
噓
05/02 11:07, , 26F
05/02 11:07, 26F
噓
05/02 11:10, , 27F
05/02 11:10, 27F
噓
05/02 11:10, , 28F
05/02 11:10, 28F
噓
05/02 11:11, , 29F
05/02 11:11, 29F
推
05/02 11:11, , 30F
05/02 11:11, 30F
噓
05/02 11:12, , 31F
05/02 11:12, 31F
噓
05/02 11:20, , 32F
05/02 11:20, 32F
噓
05/02 11:21, , 33F
05/02 11:21, 33F
噓
05/02 11:22, , 34F
05/02 11:22, 34F
推
05/02 11:23, , 35F
05/02 11:23, 35F
→
05/02 11:23, , 36F
05/02 11:23, 36F
噓
05/02 11:25, , 37F
05/02 11:25, 37F
噓
05/02 11:27, , 38F
05/02 11:27, 38F
→
05/02 11:28, , 39F
05/02 11:28, 39F
※ 編輯: owke (140.112.77.155), 05/02/2017 11:29:41
→
05/02 11:33, , 40F
05/02 11:33, 40F
噓
05/02 11:44, , 41F
05/02 11:44, 41F
推
05/02 11:44, , 42F
05/02 11:44, 42F
→
05/02 11:44, , 43F
05/02 11:44, 43F
→
05/02 11:45, , 44F
05/02 11:45, 44F
噓
05/02 11:52, , 45F
05/02 11:52, 45F
推
05/02 12:06, , 46F
05/02 12:06, 46F
噓
05/02 12:36, , 47F
05/02 12:36, 47F
→
05/02 12:37, , 48F
05/02 12:37, 48F
→
05/02 12:38, , 49F
05/02 12:38, 49F
→
05/02 12:39, , 50F
05/02 12:39, 50F
→
05/02 12:40, , 51F
05/02 12:40, 51F
→
05/02 12:41, , 52F
05/02 12:41, 52F
推
05/02 12:43, , 53F
05/02 12:43, 53F
噓
05/02 12:43, , 54F
05/02 12:43, 54F
→
05/02 12:44, , 55F
05/02 12:44, 55F
推
05/02 12:46, , 56F
05/02 12:46, 56F
→
05/02 12:47, , 57F
05/02 12:47, 57F
→
05/02 12:47, , 58F
05/02 12:47, 58F
推
05/02 12:50, , 59F
05/02 12:50, 59F
→
05/02 12:51, , 60F
05/02 12:51, 60F
推
05/02 12:52, , 61F
05/02 12:52, 61F
→
05/02 12:52, , 62F
05/02 12:52, 62F
→
05/02 12:53, , 63F
05/02 12:53, 63F
→
05/02 12:54, , 64F
05/02 12:54, 64F
噓
05/02 13:10, , 65F
05/02 13:10, 65F
推
05/02 14:14, , 66F
05/02 14:14, 66F
噓
05/02 14:39, , 67F
05/02 14:39, 67F
→
05/02 14:39, , 68F
05/02 14:39, 68F
→
05/02 14:39, , 69F
05/02 14:39, 69F
→
05/02 14:39, , 70F
05/02 14:39, 70F
推
05/02 15:52, , 71F
05/02 15:52, 71F