[討論] 幫球員設計戰術
每個教練都有他一定的風格跟擅長的戰術
因此球員的表現跟數據多少會受到教練的戰術設計所影響
例如本季的西河
很多人都表示是因為教練設計的戰術
攻守轉換是讓隊友卡位西河搶籃板由他快速發動攻勢
西河搶到籃板後帶過半場自己得分或切入分球
整季結束可以知道除了數據不錯之外戰績至少也是維持在前八季後賽名單
雷霆教練這樣應該也算找到西河的使用說明吧 讓他將自身才能發揮到極致
整季下來看得出這樣的戰術成效是不錯,數據話題十足即使不是奪冠熱門也是MVP熱門
還有之前季中的好像也有看到關於火箭的的戰術設計
忘了是哪一篇文章提到的
說火箭戰術是球員搶到籃板後先找哈登位置 然後交給哈登發動攻勢
那篇文章也是說教練刻意設計的
不只哈登本身能主動得分也能替隊友製造機會
比起前幾年今年也更是突破性的成長
不知道鄙人上面戰術的理解是否有誤
一直以來都有球員因為教練設計的戰術能突破瓶頸打出非凡的一年
然後像Walker、Lillard、Wall...等等
這些優秀控衛如果用雷霆跟火箭教練的戰術能不能也打出同樣MVP身價??
順帶一題原本哈登是打得分後衛但今年改打控衛效果很好
有其他得分後衛之後有可能在效法哈登後改打控衛打出身價嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.235.240.42
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1491900372.A.E47.html
推
04/11 16:49, , 1F
04/11 16:49, 1F
推
04/11 16:50, , 2F
04/11 16:50, 2F
→
04/11 16:50, , 3F
04/11 16:50, 3F
→
04/11 16:50, , 4F
04/11 16:50, 4F
→
04/11 16:50, , 5F
04/11 16:50, 5F
推
04/11 16:51, , 6F
04/11 16:51, 6F
→
04/11 16:51, , 7F
04/11 16:51, 7F
→
04/11 16:51, , 8F
04/11 16:51, 8F
→
04/11 16:51, , 9F
04/11 16:51, 9F
→
04/11 16:52, , 10F
04/11 16:52, 10F
→
04/11 16:53, , 11F
04/11 16:53, 11F
推
04/11 16:54, , 12F
04/11 16:54, 12F
→
04/11 16:54, , 13F
04/11 16:54, 13F
→
04/11 16:54, , 14F
04/11 16:54, 14F
噓
04/11 16:55, , 15F
04/11 16:55, 15F
推
04/11 16:56, , 16F
04/11 16:56, 16F
推
04/11 16:57, , 17F
04/11 16:57, 17F
推
04/11 16:58, , 18F
04/11 16:58, 18F
→
04/11 16:58, , 19F
04/11 16:58, 19F
推
04/11 16:59, , 20F
04/11 16:59, 20F
推
04/11 17:01, , 21F
04/11 17:01, 21F
推
04/11 17:07, , 22F
04/11 17:07, 22F
推
04/11 17:16, , 23F
04/11 17:16, 23F
→
04/11 17:16, , 24F
04/11 17:16, 24F
→
04/11 17:16, , 25F
04/11 17:16, 25F
→
04/11 17:17, , 26F
04/11 17:17, 26F
推
04/11 17:20, , 27F
04/11 17:20, 27F
→
04/11 17:21, , 28F
04/11 17:21, 28F
推
04/11 17:23, , 29F
04/11 17:23, 29F
→
04/11 17:23, , 30F
04/11 17:23, 30F
→
04/11 17:23, , 31F
04/11 17:23, 31F
→
04/11 17:26, , 32F
04/11 17:26, 32F
推
04/11 17:31, , 33F
04/11 17:31, 33F
→
04/11 17:31, , 34F
04/11 17:31, 34F
→
04/11 17:37, , 35F
04/11 17:37, 35F
→
04/11 17:40, , 36F
04/11 17:40, 36F
推
04/11 17:42, , 37F
04/11 17:42, 37F
→
04/11 17:46, , 38F
04/11 17:46, 38F
→
04/11 17:49, , 39F
04/11 17:49, 39F
→
04/11 17:50, , 40F
04/11 17:50, 40F
推
04/11 18:02, , 41F
04/11 18:02, 41F
→
04/11 18:02, , 42F
04/11 18:02, 42F
→
04/11 18:02, , 43F
04/11 18:02, 43F
推
04/11 18:06, , 44F
04/11 18:06, 44F
→
04/11 18:06, , 45F
04/11 18:06, 45F
→
04/11 18:06, , 46F
04/11 18:06, 46F
推
04/11 18:08, , 47F
04/11 18:08, 47F
→
04/11 18:08, , 48F
04/11 18:08, 48F
→
04/11 18:33, , 49F
04/11 18:33, 49F
推
04/11 19:15, , 50F
04/11 19:15, 50F
推
04/11 19:29, , 51F
04/11 19:29, 51F
噓
04/11 19:34, , 52F
04/11 19:34, 52F
→
04/11 19:35, , 53F
04/11 19:35, 53F
推
04/11 19:41, , 54F
04/11 19:41, 54F
推
04/11 20:57, , 55F
04/11 20:57, 55F
推
04/11 21:19, , 56F
04/11 21:19, 56F
推
04/11 22:18, , 57F
04/11 22:18, 57F
→
04/11 22:18, , 58F
04/11 22:18, 58F
→
04/11 22:18, , 59F
04/11 22:18, 59F
推
04/11 22:20, , 60F
04/11 22:20, 60F
→
04/11 22:20, , 61F
04/11 22:20, 61F
→
04/11 22:20, , 62F
04/11 22:20, 62F
推
04/12 10:11, , 63F
04/12 10:11, 63F
→
04/12 10:13, , 64F
04/12 10:13, 64F
→
04/12 10:13, , 65F
04/12 10:13, 65F