[討論] 為何不乾脆等雷霆火箭打完再選MVP?
雙MVP的討論一直沒少過
吵什麼破例選雙MVP?
可笑......
怎麼不乾脆等第一輪打完再選
延後選也不會怎樣
兩個人應該也會打得更拼
(更用力刷數據?)
至少讓這MVP更當之無愧
破例開MVP爭奪戰
誰沒穿褲子就很明顯了
我不否認西河打球的霸氣
場上橫沖直撞 誰也攔不住我
但中鋒縮手當鵪鶉在天空飛感覺真滑稽
拜託不是你的工作就別硬搶好嗎
為數據這樣真的很難看
難怪MVP會出走
雖然以後只會記得西河單季平均大三元紀錄
根本不會管比賽內容
NBA的歷史就是這麼樣地殘酷
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 218.164.180.149
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1491721345.A.2A8.html
推
04/09 15:03, , 1F
04/09 15:03, 1F
去年例行賽王者是誰很明顯
推
04/09 15:03, , 2F
04/09 15:03, 2F
→
04/09 15:04, , 3F
04/09 15:04, 3F
但就是例行賽兩人的表現都很棒
所以才會有雙MVP的聲音出現
剛好季後賽首輪火箭對雷霆
打完再選這樣不是很有參考價值嗎?
推
04/09 15:04, , 4F
04/09 15:04, 4F
→
04/09 15:04, , 5F
04/09 15:04, 5F
為何要拘泥在''例行賽''上呢?
本來本來
就是你們守舊思維
台灣才無法進步
推
04/09 15:04, , 6F
04/09 15:04, 6F
→
04/09 15:04, , 7F
04/09 15:04, 7F
→
04/09 15:05, , 8F
04/09 15:05, 8F
→
04/09 15:05, , 9F
04/09 15:05, 9F
※ 編輯: a11114xy (218.164.180.149), 04/09/2017 15:11:53
噓
04/09 15:06, , 10F
04/09 15:06, 10F
噓
04/09 15:07, , 11F
04/09 15:07, 11F
推
04/09 15:09, , 12F
04/09 15:09, 12F
推
04/09 15:11, , 13F
04/09 15:11, 13F
推
04/09 15:11, , 14F
04/09 15:11, 14F
噓
04/09 15:12, , 15F
04/09 15:12, 15F
噓
04/09 15:12, , 16F
04/09 15:12, 16F
→
04/09 15:12, , 17F
04/09 15:12, 17F
→
04/09 15:14, , 18F
04/09 15:14, 18F
推
04/09 15:15, , 19F
04/09 15:15, 19F
噓
04/09 15:15, , 20F
04/09 15:15, 20F
噓
04/09 15:15, , 21F
04/09 15:15, 21F
→
04/09 15:15, , 22F
04/09 15:15, 22F
推
04/09 15:15, , 23F
04/09 15:15, 23F
→
04/09 15:15, , 24F
04/09 15:15, 24F
→
04/09 15:16, , 25F
04/09 15:16, 25F
推
04/09 15:16, , 26F
04/09 15:16, 26F
→
04/09 15:16, , 27F
04/09 15:16, 27F
噓
04/09 15:16, , 28F
04/09 15:16, 28F
噓
04/09 15:17, , 29F
04/09 15:17, 29F
推
04/09 15:19, , 30F
04/09 15:19, 30F
噓
04/09 15:19, , 31F
04/09 15:19, 31F
→
04/09 15:20, , 32F
04/09 15:20, 32F
噓
04/09 15:22, , 33F
04/09 15:22, 33F
噓
04/09 15:23, , 34F
04/09 15:23, 34F
噓
04/09 15:23, , 35F
04/09 15:23, 35F
還有 44 則推文
噓
04/09 17:18, , 80F
04/09 17:18, 80F
噓
04/09 17:18, , 81F
04/09 17:18, 81F
→
04/09 17:31, , 82F
04/09 17:31, 82F
→
04/09 17:31, , 83F
04/09 17:31, 83F
→
04/09 17:31, , 84F
04/09 17:31, 84F
推
04/09 17:34, , 85F
04/09 17:34, 85F
噓
04/09 17:41, , 86F
04/09 17:41, 86F
噓
04/09 17:48, , 87F
04/09 17:48, 87F
噓
04/09 17:51, , 88F
04/09 17:51, 88F
噓
04/09 17:57, , 89F
04/09 17:57, 89F
噓
04/09 17:59, , 90F
04/09 17:59, 90F
噓
04/09 18:07, , 91F
04/09 18:07, 91F
噓
04/09 18:08, , 92F
04/09 18:08, 92F
噓
04/09 18:21, , 93F
04/09 18:21, 93F
噓
04/09 18:31, , 94F
04/09 18:31, 94F
噓
04/09 18:54, , 95F
04/09 18:54, 95F
噓
04/09 18:55, , 96F
04/09 18:55, 96F
噓
04/09 19:03, , 97F
04/09 19:03, 97F
噓
04/09 19:06, , 98F
04/09 19:06, 98F
→
04/09 19:41, , 99F
04/09 19:41, 99F
噓
04/09 19:45, , 100F
04/09 19:45, 100F
噓
04/09 19:49, , 101F
04/09 19:49, 101F
噓
04/09 19:49, , 102F
04/09 19:49, 102F
噓
04/09 19:52, , 103F
04/09 19:52, 103F
→
04/09 19:52, , 104F
04/09 19:52, 104F
噓
04/09 20:05, , 105F
04/09 20:05, 105F
噓
04/09 20:10, , 106F
04/09 20:10, 106F
噓
04/09 20:38, , 107F
04/09 20:38, 107F
噓
04/09 20:38, , 108F
04/09 20:38, 108F
噓
04/09 21:02, , 109F
04/09 21:02, 109F
推
04/09 21:02, , 110F
04/09 21:02, 110F
推
04/09 21:20, , 111F
04/09 21:20, 111F
噓
04/09 21:37, , 112F
04/09 21:37, 112F
推
04/09 21:40, , 113F
04/09 21:40, 113F
噓
04/09 21:41, , 114F
04/09 21:41, 114F
噓
04/09 22:36, , 115F
04/09 22:36, 115F
噓
04/09 23:43, , 116F
04/09 23:43, 116F
噓
04/10 00:49, , 117F
04/10 00:49, 117F
噓
04/10 01:31, , 118F
04/10 01:31, 118F
噓
04/10 14:55, , 119F
04/10 14:55, 119F