[問題] J.Teague VS Schroder
對這兩位球員不是很熟悉,但是看了今天的比賽,發現J.Teague算蠻猛的,
切入也很快,雖然不到all star等級的球員,但也不應該存在感這麼低吧,
後來老鷹還為了扶正Schroder,也讓J.Teague掰了,雖然留住J.Teague
也未必過的了姆斯這關,而且他的開發似乎也快到頂了,但難道Schroder
的潛力有更勝J.Teague嗎?
大家討論一下吧.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.44.10.154
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1478752584.A.22C.html
→
11/10 12:38, , 1F
11/10 12:38, 1F
推
11/10 12:38, , 2F
11/10 12:38, 2F
推
11/10 12:38, , 3F
11/10 12:38, 3F
推
11/10 12:39, , 4F
11/10 12:39, 4F
推
11/10 12:39, , 5F
11/10 12:39, 5F
→
11/10 12:39, , 6F
11/10 12:39, 6F
我也是覺得Teague大概也到頂了,不過德國軟豆潛力有這麼值得期待嗎?
還是單純換換陣容
※ 編輯: CleanSpurs (114.44.10.154), 11/10/2016 12:40:22
→
11/10 12:39, , 7F
11/10 12:39, 7F
推
11/10 12:39, , 8F
11/10 12:39, 8F
→
11/10 12:40, , 9F
11/10 12:40, 9F
推
11/10 12:41, , 10F
11/10 12:41, 10F
→
11/10 12:41, , 11F
11/10 12:41, 11F
噓
11/10 12:41, , 12F
11/10 12:41, 12F
推
11/10 12:41, , 13F
11/10 12:41, 13F
→
11/10 12:41, , 14F
11/10 12:41, 14F
推
11/10 12:43, , 15F
11/10 12:43, 15F
→
11/10 12:44, , 16F
11/10 12:44, 16F
推
11/10 12:47, , 17F
11/10 12:47, 17F
→
11/10 12:47, , 18F
11/10 12:47, 18F
推
11/10 12:48, , 19F
11/10 12:48, 19F
推
11/10 12:48, , 20F
11/10 12:48, 20F
→
11/10 12:48, , 21F
11/10 12:48, 21F
推
11/10 12:49, , 22F
11/10 12:49, 22F
推
11/10 12:50, , 23F
11/10 12:50, 23F
推
11/10 12:52, , 24F
11/10 12:52, 24F
推
11/10 12:52, , 25F
11/10 12:52, 25F
推
11/10 12:53, , 26F
11/10 12:53, 26F
推
11/10 12:54, , 27F
11/10 12:54, 27F
推
11/10 12:55, , 28F
11/10 12:55, 28F
→
11/10 12:56, , 29F
11/10 12:56, 29F
推
11/10 12:56, , 30F
11/10 12:56, 30F
→
11/10 12:56, , 31F
11/10 12:56, 31F
→
11/10 12:56, , 32F
11/10 12:56, 32F
推
11/10 13:07, , 33F
11/10 13:07, 33F
→
11/10 13:25, , 34F
11/10 13:25, 34F
推
11/10 13:33, , 35F
11/10 13:33, 35F
推
11/10 14:12, , 36F
11/10 14:12, 36F
推
11/10 14:29, , 37F
11/10 14:29, 37F
推
11/10 19:31, , 38F
11/10 19:31, 38F
→
11/10 19:40, , 39F
11/10 19:40, 39F
推
11/10 21:20, , 40F
11/10 21:20, 40F
推
11/11 08:38, , 41F
11/11 08:38, 41F