[討論] 林書豪和Livingston誰比較好用
兩位都是板凳大將
而且球權都不是最多的
林迷普遍覺得林書豪有先發實力
本季季後賽受到重用
其中不乏幾場爆發性的演出
七場下來
平均上場27分鐘
拿12.4分、2.3籃板、2.6助攻、0.7抄截、1.6失誤、FG.413、eFG%.437
可惜黃蜂還是主打Walker
主打林書豪的話關門戰可能勝負難料
而Livingston在Curry受傷後頂上先發
打的有模有樣
季後賽平均上場27.2分鐘
13分、3.7籃板、5助攻、1抄截、1.2失誤、FG.564、eFG%.564
數據頗為相似
而後者略勝一籌
但考量到林書豪只領兩百萬
CP值應該高於Livingston的五百萬
不知道給鄉民選會選哪一位^^?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.232.140.155
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1462200243.A.FFA.html
推
05/02 22:44, , 1F
05/02 22:44, 1F
推
05/02 22:45, , 2F
05/02 22:45, 2F
→
05/02 22:45, , 3F
05/02 22:45, 3F
噓
05/02 22:45, , 4F
05/02 22:45, 4F
推
05/02 22:45, , 5F
05/02 22:45, 5F
→
05/02 22:46, , 6F
05/02 22:46, 6F
→
05/02 22:46, , 7F
05/02 22:46, 7F
噓
05/02 22:46, , 8F
05/02 22:46, 8F
→
05/02 22:46, , 9F
05/02 22:46, 9F
→
05/02 22:47, , 10F
05/02 22:47, 10F
推
05/02 22:47, , 11F
05/02 22:47, 11F
→
05/02 22:47, , 12F
05/02 22:47, 12F
推
05/02 22:47, , 13F
05/02 22:47, 13F
推
05/02 22:47, , 14F
05/02 22:47, 14F
推
05/02 22:47, , 15F
05/02 22:47, 15F
→
05/02 22:47, , 16F
05/02 22:47, 16F
噓
05/02 22:48, , 17F
05/02 22:48, 17F
推
05/02 22:48, , 18F
05/02 22:48, 18F
推
05/02 22:48, , 19F
05/02 22:48, 19F
推
05/02 22:50, , 20F
05/02 22:50, 20F
噓
05/02 22:50, , 21F
05/02 22:50, 21F
→
05/02 22:50, , 22F
05/02 22:50, 22F
推
05/02 22:50, , 23F
05/02 22:50, 23F
噓
05/02 22:50, , 24F
05/02 22:50, 24F
推
05/02 22:51, , 25F
05/02 22:51, 25F
→
05/02 22:51, , 26F
05/02 22:51, 26F
→
05/02 22:51, , 27F
05/02 22:51, 27F
噓
05/02 22:51, , 28F
05/02 22:51, 28F
→
05/02 22:51, , 29F
05/02 22:51, 29F
噓
05/02 22:51, , 30F
05/02 22:51, 30F
推
05/02 22:53, , 31F
05/02 22:53, 31F
推
05/02 22:53, , 32F
05/02 22:53, 32F
噓
05/02 22:53, , 33F
05/02 22:53, 33F
噓
05/02 22:53, , 34F
05/02 22:53, 34F
噓
05/02 22:54, , 35F
05/02 22:54, 35F
噓
05/02 22:56, , 36F
05/02 22:56, 36F
推
05/02 22:58, , 37F
05/02 22:58, 37F
噓
05/02 23:00, , 38F
05/02 23:00, 38F
推
05/02 23:00, , 39F
05/02 23:00, 39F
還有 23 則推文
→
05/02 23:33, , 63F
05/02 23:33, 63F
噓
05/02 23:33, , 64F
05/02 23:33, 64F
噓
05/02 23:33, , 65F
05/02 23:33, 65F
推
05/02 23:33, , 66F
05/02 23:33, 66F
噓
05/02 23:37, , 67F
05/02 23:37, 67F
噓
05/02 23:41, , 68F
05/02 23:41, 68F
噓
05/02 23:42, , 69F
05/02 23:42, 69F
→
05/03 00:03, , 70F
05/03 00:03, 70F
噓
05/03 00:03, , 71F
05/03 00:03, 71F
推
05/03 00:04, , 72F
05/03 00:04, 72F
→
05/03 00:05, , 73F
05/03 00:05, 73F
→
05/03 00:19, , 74F
05/03 00:19, 74F
推
05/03 00:22, , 75F
05/03 00:22, 75F
噓
05/03 01:06, , 76F
05/03 01:06, 76F
推
05/03 01:16, , 77F
05/03 01:16, 77F
推
05/03 01:37, , 78F
05/03 01:37, 78F
→
05/03 01:38, , 79F
05/03 01:38, 79F
→
05/03 01:38, , 80F
05/03 01:38, 80F
推
05/03 02:20, , 81F
05/03 02:20, 81F
→
05/03 02:44, , 82F
05/03 02:44, 82F
推
05/03 03:20, , 83F
05/03 03:20, 83F
噓
05/03 05:38, , 84F
05/03 05:38, 84F
噓
05/03 06:55, , 85F
05/03 06:55, 85F
推
05/03 06:58, , 86F
05/03 06:58, 86F
噓
05/03 07:13, , 87F
05/03 07:13, 87F
→
05/03 07:33, , 88F
05/03 07:33, 88F
推
05/03 07:40, , 89F
05/03 07:40, 89F
推
05/03 08:00, , 90F
05/03 08:00, 90F
推
05/03 08:11, , 91F
05/03 08:11, 91F
推
05/03 08:39, , 92F
05/03 08:39, 92F
推
05/03 09:01, , 93F
05/03 09:01, 93F
推
05/03 09:12, , 94F
05/03 09:12, 94F
→
05/03 09:19, , 95F
05/03 09:19, 95F
推
05/03 09:23, , 96F
05/03 09:23, 96F
推
05/03 09:35, , 97F
05/03 09:35, 97F
推
05/03 10:04, , 98F
05/03 10:04, 98F
噓
05/03 10:32, , 99F
05/03 10:32, 99F
噓
05/03 11:01, , 100F
05/03 11:01, 100F
噓
05/03 11:14, , 101F
05/03 11:14, 101F
噓
05/03 18:10, , 102F
05/03 18:10, 102F