[討論] 黃蜂整隊的單打能力是否被強烈低估?
今天黃蜂對上Spurs
馬刺依然靠團隊籃球 大量助攻得分
淪為單打 沒幾個助攻的黃蜂卻戰的馬刺喘不過氣來
感覺放球員靠單打就足以抗衡大動作補強的馬刺
Walker單打跟本窮人版衛少
Jefferson得分禁區與取與求
Williams手感一來真的很恐怖
還有雙板凳暴徒Lin跟Lamb
反觀馬刺球員沒有能靠單打吃的開的
(年輕的GDP當然可以,但… )
AGG也沒打出預期的單打能力
是否黃蜂隊因為星度不夠
各球員單打能力被低估了?
--
歡迎參觀本溫拿私密部落格↓↓↓↓↓
http://www.wretch.cc/blog/Ma19_5566
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.200.97.33
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1446952145.A.BEA.html
推
11/08 11:12, , 1F
11/08 11:12, 1F
→
11/08 11:13, , 2F
11/08 11:13, 2F
→
11/08 11:13, , 3F
11/08 11:13, 3F
推
11/08 11:14, , 4F
11/08 11:14, 4F
→
11/08 11:14, , 5F
11/08 11:14, 5F
→
11/08 11:15, , 6F
11/08 11:15, 6F
明明互有領先 終於在三節末的時候才拉開
→
11/08 11:15, , 7F
11/08 11:15, 7F
推
11/08 11:15, , 8F
11/08 11:15, 8F
→
11/08 11:16, , 9F
11/08 11:16, 9F
※ 編輯: RoundKick (1.200.97.33), 11/08/2015 11:18:28
→
11/08 11:17, , 10F
11/08 11:17, 10F
→
11/08 11:17, , 11F
11/08 11:17, 11F
推
11/08 11:17, , 12F
11/08 11:17, 12F
→
11/08 11:18, , 13F
11/08 11:18, 13F
推
11/08 11:20, , 14F
11/08 11:20, 14F
→
11/08 11:21, , 15F
11/08 11:21, 15F
推
11/08 11:21, , 16F
11/08 11:21, 16F
推
11/08 11:21, , 17F
11/08 11:21, 17F
推
11/08 11:21, , 18F
11/08 11:21, 18F
推
11/08 11:21, , 19F
11/08 11:21, 19F
推
11/08 11:21, , 20F
11/08 11:21, 20F
→
11/08 11:21, , 21F
11/08 11:21, 21F
→
11/08 11:22, , 22F
11/08 11:22, 22F
推
11/08 11:22, , 23F
11/08 11:22, 23F
推
11/08 11:22, , 24F
11/08 11:22, 24F
→
11/08 11:22, , 25F
11/08 11:22, 25F
→
11/08 11:22, , 26F
11/08 11:22, 26F
→
11/08 11:23, , 27F
11/08 11:23, 27F
→
11/08 11:23, , 28F
11/08 11:23, 28F
→
11/08 11:23, , 29F
11/08 11:23, 29F
推
11/08 11:25, , 30F
11/08 11:25, 30F
推
11/08 11:27, , 31F
11/08 11:27, 31F
推
11/08 11:28, , 32F
11/08 11:28, 32F
推
11/08 11:28, , 33F
11/08 11:28, 33F
→
11/08 11:28, , 34F
11/08 11:28, 34F
推
11/08 11:28, , 35F
11/08 11:28, 35F
→
11/08 11:28, , 36F
11/08 11:28, 36F
→
11/08 11:29, , 37F
11/08 11:29, 37F
→
11/08 11:30, , 38F
11/08 11:30, 38F
推
11/08 11:30, , 39F
11/08 11:30, 39F
→
11/08 11:32, , 40F
11/08 11:32, 40F
噓
11/08 11:35, , 41F
11/08 11:35, 41F
→
11/08 11:35, , 42F
11/08 11:35, 42F
推
11/08 11:36, , 43F
11/08 11:36, 43F
推
11/08 11:37, , 44F
11/08 11:37, 44F
→
11/08 11:37, , 45F
11/08 11:37, 45F
噓
11/08 11:37, , 46F
11/08 11:37, 46F
推
11/08 11:39, , 47F
11/08 11:39, 47F
推
11/08 11:41, , 48F
11/08 11:41, 48F
噓
11/08 11:41, , 49F
11/08 11:41, 49F
噓
11/08 11:41, , 50F
11/08 11:41, 50F
噓
11/08 11:45, , 51F
11/08 11:45, 51F
推
11/08 11:45, , 52F
11/08 11:45, 52F
推
11/08 11:45, , 53F
11/08 11:45, 53F
噓
11/08 11:46, , 54F
11/08 11:46, 54F
→
11/08 11:48, , 55F
11/08 11:48, 55F
→
11/08 11:49, , 56F
11/08 11:49, 56F
→
11/08 11:50, , 57F
11/08 11:50, 57F
推
11/08 11:50, , 58F
11/08 11:50, 58F
推
11/08 11:51, , 59F
11/08 11:51, 59F
噓
11/08 11:51, , 60F
11/08 11:51, 60F
→
11/08 11:51, , 61F
11/08 11:51, 61F
→
11/08 11:52, , 62F
11/08 11:52, 62F
噓
11/08 11:52, , 63F
11/08 11:52, 63F
→
11/08 11:52, , 64F
11/08 11:52, 64F
→
11/08 11:52, , 65F
11/08 11:52, 65F
噓
11/08 11:52, , 66F
11/08 11:52, 66F
噓
11/08 11:54, , 67F
11/08 11:54, 67F
推
11/08 11:58, , 68F
11/08 11:58, 68F
→
11/08 12:06, , 69F
11/08 12:06, 69F
噓
11/08 12:09, , 70F
11/08 12:09, 70F
→
11/08 12:16, , 71F
11/08 12:16, 71F
噓
11/08 12:25, , 72F
11/08 12:25, 72F
→
11/08 12:39, , 73F
11/08 12:39, 73F
噓
11/08 12:46, , 74F
11/08 12:46, 74F
噓
11/08 14:26, , 75F
11/08 14:26, 75F
推
11/08 16:51, , 76F
11/08 16:51, 76F
噓
11/08 17:03, , 77F
11/08 17:03, 77F