[討論] MDA執教湖人成效真的很差嗎?
看看上面的LIVE 湖人已經快被領先30分了 一整個慘
雖然今天沒有豪神跟NASH 但目前這陣容還是比去年多了個老大
結果怎麼會被痛電成這樣?
雖然這只是熱身賽 可是看看目前這位教練的執教理念
各位真的覺得適合現在的湖人嗎?
去年一堆湖迷把戰績慘澹都怪到MDA身上
但去年老大 NASH都受傷 只有姐姐和一堆蝦兵蟹將撐場面
但靠著MDA的進攻體系 還是能夠跟對手打得難分難解
湖迷和魔術強森會說MDA完全不教防守 輸了很多不該輸的比賽
但去年那批人是能夠打出甚麼防守??? 進攻倒是讓大家看得蠻爽的阿
加上高層似乎下達指示要拚樂透
MDA也只能默默輸球 讓球迷老大和魔術一直炮他
湖人高層也很搞笑 把MDA弄走之後才交易來豪神
現在這批陣容要實現目前教練要求的防守根本不可能
進攻又只會給老大一直單打 豪神老樣子站在底線搖擺
只有NASH上場時有傳導 可是NASH打的就是MDA那套阿= =
MDA去年真的帶得很差嗎?
大家不覺得給MDA來帶現在的湖人會更好嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 76.91.23.105
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1413168247.A.6BB.html
→
10/13 10:44, , 1F
10/13 10:44, 1F
噓
10/13 10:45, , 2F
10/13 10:45, 2F
推
10/13 10:45, , 3F
10/13 10:45, 3F
推
10/13 10:45, , 4F
10/13 10:45, 4F
→
10/13 10:46, , 5F
10/13 10:46, 5F
→
10/13 10:46, , 6F
10/13 10:46, 6F
推
10/13 10:47, , 7F
10/13 10:47, 7F
→
10/13 10:47, , 8F
10/13 10:47, 8F
噓
10/13 10:48, , 9F
10/13 10:48, 9F
→
10/13 10:48, , 10F
10/13 10:48, 10F
→
10/13 10:52, , 11F
10/13 10:52, 11F
推
10/13 10:57, , 12F
10/13 10:57, 12F
→
10/13 11:01, , 13F
10/13 11:01, 13F
→
10/13 11:04, , 14F
10/13 11:04, 14F
推
10/13 11:06, , 15F
10/13 11:06, 15F
推
10/13 11:06, , 16F
10/13 11:06, 16F
→
10/13 11:07, , 17F
10/13 11:07, 17F
→
10/13 11:08, , 18F
10/13 11:08, 18F
推
10/13 11:08, , 19F
10/13 11:08, 19F
→
10/13 11:08, , 20F
10/13 11:08, 20F
→
10/13 11:08, , 21F
10/13 11:08, 21F
→
10/13 11:09, , 22F
10/13 11:09, 22F
→
10/13 11:09, , 23F
10/13 11:09, 23F
→
10/13 11:10, , 24F
10/13 11:10, 24F
→
10/13 11:14, , 25F
10/13 11:14, 25F
→
10/13 11:14, , 26F
10/13 11:14, 26F
→
10/13 11:15, , 27F
10/13 11:15, 27F
→
10/13 11:16, , 28F
10/13 11:16, 28F
→
10/13 11:16, , 29F
10/13 11:16, 29F
推
10/13 11:16, , 30F
10/13 11:16, 30F
→
10/13 11:16, , 31F
10/13 11:16, 31F
→
10/13 11:17, , 32F
10/13 11:17, 32F
→
10/13 11:18, , 33F
10/13 11:18, 33F
→
10/13 11:18, , 34F
10/13 11:18, 34F
→
10/13 11:18, , 35F
10/13 11:18, 35F
推
10/13 11:18, , 36F
10/13 11:18, 36F
→
10/13 11:18, , 37F
10/13 11:18, 37F
推
10/13 11:19, , 38F
10/13 11:19, 38F
→
10/13 11:19, , 39F
10/13 11:19, 39F
→
10/13 11:19, , 40F
10/13 11:19, 40F
推
10/13 11:19, , 41F
10/13 11:19, 41F
→
10/13 11:19, , 42F
10/13 11:19, 42F
→
10/13 11:19, , 43F
10/13 11:19, 43F
→
10/13 11:20, , 44F
10/13 11:20, 44F
→
10/13 11:21, , 45F
10/13 11:21, 45F
推
10/13 11:21, , 46F
10/13 11:21, 46F
→
10/13 11:22, , 47F
10/13 11:22, 47F
→
10/13 11:22, , 48F
10/13 11:22, 48F
→
10/13 11:23, , 49F
10/13 11:23, 49F
→
10/13 11:23, , 50F
10/13 11:23, 50F
→
10/13 11:23, , 51F
10/13 11:23, 51F
→
10/13 11:23, , 52F
10/13 11:23, 52F
推
10/13 11:24, , 53F
10/13 11:24, 53F
→
10/13 11:24, , 54F
10/13 11:24, 54F
→
10/13 11:24, , 55F
10/13 11:24, 55F
→
10/13 11:25, , 56F
10/13 11:25, 56F
→
10/13 11:25, , 57F
10/13 11:25, 57F
→
10/13 11:25, , 58F
10/13 11:25, 58F
推
10/13 11:26, , 59F
10/13 11:26, 59F
推
10/13 11:26, , 60F
10/13 11:26, 60F
→
10/13 11:27, , 61F
10/13 11:27, 61F
→
10/13 11:29, , 62F
10/13 11:29, 62F
推
10/13 11:30, , 63F
10/13 11:30, 63F
推
10/13 11:30, , 64F
10/13 11:30, 64F
推
10/13 11:31, , 65F
10/13 11:31, 65F
→
10/13 11:31, , 66F
10/13 11:31, 66F
→
10/13 11:32, , 67F
10/13 11:32, 67F
→
10/13 11:33, , 68F
10/13 11:33, 68F
推
10/13 11:33, , 69F
10/13 11:33, 69F
→
10/13 11:34, , 70F
10/13 11:34, 70F
推
10/13 11:40, , 71F
10/13 11:40, 71F
→
10/13 11:52, , 72F
10/13 11:52, 72F
推
10/13 12:33, , 73F
10/13 12:33, 73F
→
10/13 12:33, , 74F
10/13 12:33, 74F
推
10/13 12:35, , 75F
10/13 12:35, 75F
→
10/13 12:39, , 76F
10/13 12:39, 76F
→
10/13 13:00, , 77F
10/13 13:00, 77F
推
10/13 13:50, , 78F
10/13 13:50, 78F