[討論] 大家是不是被喬科給寵壞了
不是喬柯維奇,哥說的是喬丹跟柯比,
從看nba以來就是這兩個一直在投絕殺球,
導致後一輩的新人很辛苦,有一點小成就
就要被拿來跟這兩個比,可是LBJ今天給三弟那球
如果三分沒進,酸民就會說,LBJ關鍵時刻又神隱了
結果今天進了,卻大部分圍繞在三弟就是有英雄命
如果LBJ沒切進去,叮噹是不會補防的,更沒有三弟的三分空檔
其實哥要說的是LBJ真的很辛苦,總是拿來跟喬丹比較
但我覺得LBJ永遠不會以喬丹為模板,他打法就是LBJ式打法
也許近一點像魔術強森,但未來世代會有一個LBJ模板供後人學習
有幸看過喬科世代的,我只能說真的有點被寵壞了
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.162.170.228
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1402307568.A.99C.html
噓
06/09 17:53, , 1F
06/09 17:53, 1F
推
06/09 17:53, , 2F
06/09 17:53, 2F
噓
06/09 17:54, , 3F
06/09 17:54, 3F
→
06/09 17:54, , 4F
06/09 17:54, 4F
噓
06/09 17:54, , 5F
06/09 17:54, 5F
噓
06/09 17:55, , 6F
06/09 17:55, 6F
推
06/09 17:55, , 7F
06/09 17:55, 7F
噓
06/09 17:55, , 8F
06/09 17:55, 8F
噓
06/09 17:57, , 9F
06/09 17:57, 9F
→
06/09 17:58, , 10F
06/09 17:58, 10F
→
06/09 17:58, , 11F
06/09 17:58, 11F
→
06/09 17:58, , 12F
06/09 17:58, 12F
→
06/09 17:59, , 13F
06/09 17:59, 13F
→
06/09 17:59, , 14F
06/09 17:59, 14F
噓
06/09 18:00, , 15F
06/09 18:00, 15F
噓
06/09 18:00, , 16F
06/09 18:00, 16F
推
06/09 18:00, , 17F
06/09 18:00, 17F
→
06/09 18:01, , 18F
06/09 18:01, 18F
推
06/09 18:02, , 19F
06/09 18:02, 19F
→
06/09 18:02, , 20F
06/09 18:02, 20F
噓
06/09 18:03, , 21F
06/09 18:03, 21F
推
06/09 18:03, , 22F
06/09 18:03, 22F
→
06/09 18:03, , 23F
06/09 18:03, 23F
噓
06/09 18:05, , 24F
06/09 18:05, 24F
噓
06/09 18:05, , 25F
06/09 18:05, 25F
推
06/09 18:06, , 26F
06/09 18:06, 26F
噓
06/09 18:13, , 27F
06/09 18:13, 27F
推
06/09 18:14, , 28F
06/09 18:14, 28F
噓
06/09 18:18, , 29F
06/09 18:18, 29F
推
06/09 18:21, , 30F
06/09 18:21, 30F
噓
06/09 18:26, , 31F
06/09 18:26, 31F
噓
06/09 18:28, , 32F
06/09 18:28, 32F
噓
06/09 18:31, , 33F
06/09 18:31, 33F
噓
06/09 18:37, , 34F
06/09 18:37, 34F
推
06/09 18:44, , 35F
06/09 18:44, 35F
噓
06/09 18:50, , 36F
06/09 18:50, 36F
噓
06/09 18:59, , 37F
06/09 18:59, 37F
→
06/09 18:59, , 38F
06/09 18:59, 38F
推
06/09 19:14, , 39F
06/09 19:14, 39F
噓
06/09 19:40, , 40F
06/09 19:40, 40F
噓
06/09 19:57, , 41F
06/09 19:57, 41F
噓
06/09 22:15, , 42F
06/09 22:15, 42F
噓
06/09 22:21, , 43F
06/09 22:21, 43F
→
06/10 02:37, , 44F
06/10 02:37, 44F