[新聞] 火箭交易難產三大理由已回收
原文 http://ppt.cc/zbjr
搜狐翻譯 http://sports.sohu.com/20140131/n394434128.shtml
原文講了很多交易,搜狐只取了火箭交易,貼過來給大家參考看看囉
----------------------
北京時間1月31日,美國著名籃球專家傑瑞德-澤林(Jared Zweling)撰文對火箭隊的
情況進行了分析,同時列舉出火箭本賽季至今交易難產的三大理由,其中包括引進
霍華德令火箭成為眾矢之的等等。文章編譯如下:
This past weekend, Rockets general manager Daryl Morey told ClutchFans, "The
window to trade (Omer Asik) was (in December), and teams weren’t aggressive
enough to get him." The question is: Why couldn't the Rockets find a trade
partner?
此前接受媒體採訪時,火箭總經理莫雷曾表示,在去年12月的確嘗試過交易阿西克,
但是其他球隊引進阿西克的態度並不是很積極。或許有一個問題值得思考,那就是為
何火箭很難尋找到一個交易夥伴呢?
The biggest ongoing reason Asik and Jeremy Lin—the Rockets' two biggest
trading chips—haven't been moved is that each has a backloaded, roughly
$15 million salary next season. Most teams are not going to mortgage their
franchise like that for non-All-Stars. Also, while Asik is a solid player,
small ball rules the league these days.
首先在交易籌碼方面。從此前情況來看,阿西克和林書豪或許是火箭如今最主要的兩
大交易籌碼,然而兩人下賽季的合同薪金卻高達1500萬美元。對於其他球隊而言,他
們顯然不會為了非全明星球員而承擔這樣的合同。
The Rockets need an elite two-way point guard and would likely love to trade
Lin and Asik to Boston for Rajon Rondo. But why would the Celtics want to
move him now that he's healthy, especially when they have a nice young core
to build around him, are under the luxury tax and plan to have a high draft
pick this summer?
以現有陣容配置來看,火箭需要的是一個精英級的全能控衛,這也是他們此前與凱爾
特人的朗多傳出“緋聞”的原因。曾有訊息源稱,火箭可能考慮用林書豪和阿西克打
包,去交易朗多,然而對於凱爾特人而言,他們或許找不到太多理由去進行這樣的交
易。
Another reason not in the Rockets' favor could be that some GMs who don't
want to work in the public eye have been turned off by the team being open
about Asik's availability and the prospect of negotiations making it to
the press.
其次,隨著交易截止日的臨近,聯盟中不斷傳出有關交易的流言,而火箭顯然是其中
出現次數較為頻繁的球隊之一。對於一些球隊而言,在這個時候,他們顯然不希望與
火箭扯上太多關係,因為他們不想讓球隊的交易前景曝光在公眾以及太多媒體面前。
The third factor: The reluctance to deal with Houston could be payback to
the Rockets from the Dwight Howard free-agency saga last summer. Two NBA
agents close to the team offered their perspectives.
火箭至今交易難產的第三個理由與引進霍華德有關。對此,聯盟中的一個經紀人表達
了自己的看法。
One said, "Teams want Houston to sit there and suffer because they weren't
in the Dwight Howard sweepstakes and because (there was some boasting)
from the Rockets (within league circles) about how they were going to
win now that they've got Dwight. So (teams are) like, 'We're not going
to help you out. Let Houston sit there and lose in the first round or
the second round.' Teams are like that at this point, and it's motivated
because of (Howard)."
“其他球隊想要看到火箭遇到困難,因為對於當初贏得霍華德爭奪戰,(有些吹噓)
來自火箭(在聯盟範圍內)。因此(那些球隊)會這麼想,‘我們並不會幫助你。
讓火箭在第一輪或者第二輪就輸球。’其他球隊都會像這麼想,因為(霍華德)他
們受到刺激了。”一個經紀人如是說道。
Another said, "They have arrogance in Houston. So that plays a part in how
things are not progressing."
另一個說“休士頓太過傲慢。這使得交易沒有進展。”
=================
評:看來...接下來我們還會看到謠言滿天飛,但沒有任何實質結果的娛樂交易新聞
(爆米花)
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 220.136.212.18
→
02/01 11:05, , 1F
02/01 11:05, 1F
推
02/01 11:07, , 2F
02/01 11:07, 2F
→
02/01 11:09, , 3F
02/01 11:09, 3F
推
02/01 11:09, , 4F
02/01 11:09, 4F
→
02/01 11:09, , 5F
02/01 11:09, 5F
推
02/01 11:10, , 6F
02/01 11:10, 6F
→
02/01 11:10, , 7F
02/01 11:10, 7F
推
02/01 11:11, , 8F
02/01 11:11, 8F
推
02/01 11:11, , 9F
02/01 11:11, 9F
→
02/01 11:12, , 10F
02/01 11:12, 10F
推
02/01 11:14, , 11F
02/01 11:14, 11F
推
02/01 11:15, , 12F
02/01 11:15, 12F
推
02/01 11:18, , 13F
02/01 11:18, 13F
噓
02/01 11:18, , 14F
02/01 11:18, 14F
→
02/01 11:19, , 15F
02/01 11:19, 15F
→
02/01 11:20, , 16F
02/01 11:20, 16F
推
02/01 11:20, , 17F
02/01 11:20, 17F
→
02/01 11:20, , 18F
02/01 11:20, 18F
噓
02/01 11:20, , 19F
02/01 11:20, 19F
推
02/01 11:21, , 20F
02/01 11:21, 20F
→
02/01 11:21, , 21F
02/01 11:21, 21F
→
02/01 11:22, , 22F
02/01 11:22, 22F
→
02/01 11:22, , 23F
02/01 11:22, 23F
→
02/01 11:22, , 24F
02/01 11:22, 24F
推
02/01 11:24, , 25F
02/01 11:24, 25F
推
02/01 11:24, , 26F
02/01 11:24, 26F
噓
02/01 11:25, , 27F
02/01 11:25, 27F
→
02/01 11:26, , 28F
02/01 11:26, 28F
推
02/01 11:30, , 29F
02/01 11:30, 29F
噓
02/01 11:30, , 30F
02/01 11:30, 30F
→
02/01 11:31, , 31F
02/01 11:31, 31F
噓
02/01 11:33, , 32F
02/01 11:33, 32F
→
02/01 11:37, , 33F
02/01 11:37, 33F
推
02/01 11:39, , 34F
02/01 11:39, 34F
推
02/01 11:39, , 35F
02/01 11:39, 35F
噓
02/01 11:53, , 36F
02/01 11:53, 36F
→
02/01 11:54, , 37F
02/01 11:54, 37F
推
02/01 11:58, , 38F
02/01 11:58, 38F
→
02/01 11:59, , 39F
02/01 11:59, 39F
→
02/01 12:01, , 40F
02/01 12:01, 40F
噓
02/01 12:07, , 41F
02/01 12:07, 41F
推
02/01 12:11, , 42F
02/01 12:11, 42F
→
02/01 12:12, , 43F
02/01 12:12, 43F
→
02/01 12:12, , 44F
02/01 12:12, 44F
推
02/01 12:12, , 45F
02/01 12:12, 45F
→
02/01 12:16, , 46F
02/01 12:16, 46F
→
02/01 12:17, , 47F
02/01 12:17, 47F
推
02/01 12:18, , 48F
02/01 12:18, 48F
推
02/01 12:18, , 49F
02/01 12:18, 49F
→
02/01 12:27, , 50F
02/01 12:27, 50F
推
02/01 12:30, , 51F
02/01 12:30, 51F
推
02/01 12:32, , 52F
02/01 12:32, 52F
→
02/01 12:43, , 53F
02/01 12:43, 53F
推
02/01 12:44, , 54F
02/01 12:44, 54F
推
02/01 12:44, , 55F
02/01 12:44, 55F
推
02/01 12:50, , 56F
02/01 12:50, 56F
推
02/01 13:25, , 57F
02/01 13:25, 57F
推
02/01 13:28, , 58F
02/01 13:28, 58F
→
02/01 13:31, , 59F
02/01 13:31, 59F
推
02/01 13:31, , 60F
02/01 13:31, 60F
→
02/01 13:33, , 61F
02/01 13:33, 61F
→
02/01 13:33, , 62F
02/01 13:33, 62F
推
02/01 13:36, , 63F
02/01 13:36, 63F
推
02/01 13:50, , 64F
02/01 13:50, 64F
推
02/01 13:57, , 65F
02/01 13:57, 65F
推
02/01 14:04, , 66F
02/01 14:04, 66F
→
02/01 14:05, , 67F
02/01 14:05, 67F
噓
02/01 14:05, , 68F
02/01 14:05, 68F
噓
02/01 14:08, , 69F
02/01 14:08, 69F
推
02/01 14:09, , 70F
02/01 14:09, 70F
→
02/01 14:11, , 71F
02/01 14:11, 71F
→
02/01 14:11, , 72F
02/01 14:11, 72F
推
02/01 14:12, , 73F
02/01 14:12, 73F
推
02/01 14:14, , 74F
02/01 14:14, 74F
推
02/01 14:14, , 75F
02/01 14:14, 75F
推
02/01 14:43, , 76F
02/01 14:43, 76F
→
02/01 14:43, , 77F
02/01 14:43, 77F
推
02/01 14:53, , 78F
02/01 14:53, 78F
推
02/01 15:16, , 79F
02/01 15:16, 79F
噓
02/01 16:30, , 80F
02/01 16:30, 80F
推
02/01 16:41, , 81F
02/01 16:41, 81F
→
02/01 17:00, , 82F
02/01 17:00, 82F
噓
02/01 17:11, , 83F
02/01 17:11, 83F
推
02/01 17:35, , 84F
02/01 17:35, 84F
→
02/01 21:07, , 85F
02/01 21:07, 85F
→
02/02 12:56, , 86F
02/02 12:56, 86F