[球員] 魔獸真的那麼讚嗎?他的模版?已回收
各為晚安,今天不是要來發優文.
純粹只是要來討論魔獸模版.
小弟從喬丹在白襪開始看球了。
我發現魔獸和早期的勉族,馬戴,阿罵體型和打法很像,
都是靠體能在禁區飛上飛下,
低位都不是強項.
勉族四分打的那年就不用說了,真是威爆當年NBA.
我當年去紐約NBA專賣店,幾乎都是勉族的商品.
馬袋年輕的時後,那個飛翔高度和距離,真的超跨張,看太陽比賽真的只有爽一個字.
阿罵前面威的那幾年就不用說了,完全就是馬袋的暴力翻版.
進攻看的是天份,防守看的是心態.
馬袋前期就是靠天份,後期受傷心態調整也成了防守悍將.
但是同樣的,勉族就是沒有進攻天份,早期也是靠防守威出來的.
可是你看老了的勉族變如何了?
雖然他們四個體型和打法很像.
但細分來看,魔獸和勉族同一模版,馬袋和阿罵同一模版.
那我就真的不了解 ,為何魔獸的價值可以被炒那麼高?
以純中鋒來說,希柏特也年輕,進攻天份更好,身材防守也不錯.
如果是炒希柏特,我可以理解.
炒作草莓獸???現今NBA怎麼了?
--
Sent from my Android
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 222.251.20.191
→
07/06 18:21, , 1F
07/06 18:21, 1F
推
07/06 18:22, , 2F
07/06 18:22, 2F
→
07/06 18:23, , 3F
07/06 18:23, 3F
→
07/06 18:23, , 4F
07/06 18:23, 4F
推
07/06 18:24, , 5F
07/06 18:24, 5F
→
07/06 18:25, , 6F
07/06 18:25, 6F
→
07/06 18:26, , 7F
07/06 18:26, 7F
推
07/06 18:26, , 8F
07/06 18:26, 8F
推
07/06 18:26, , 9F
07/06 18:26, 9F
→
07/06 18:27, , 10F
07/06 18:27, 10F
→
07/06 18:27, , 11F
07/06 18:27, 11F
→
07/06 18:27, , 12F
07/06 18:27, 12F
→
07/06 18:27, , 13F
07/06 18:27, 13F
→
07/06 18:27, , 14F
07/06 18:27, 14F
推
07/06 18:29, , 15F
07/06 18:29, 15F
→
07/06 18:29, , 16F
07/06 18:29, 16F
→
07/06 18:29, , 17F
07/06 18:29, 17F
→
07/06 18:30, , 18F
07/06 18:30, 18F
→
07/06 18:30, , 19F
07/06 18:30, 19F
→
07/06 18:30, , 20F
07/06 18:30, 20F
→
07/06 18:30, , 21F
07/06 18:30, 21F
→
07/06 18:30, , 22F
07/06 18:30, 22F
→
07/06 18:31, , 23F
07/06 18:31, 23F
→
07/06 18:31, , 24F
07/06 18:31, 24F
推
07/06 18:31, , 25F
07/06 18:31, 25F
→
07/06 18:33, , 26F
07/06 18:33, 26F
→
07/06 18:33, , 27F
07/06 18:33, 27F
噓
07/06 18:33, , 28F
07/06 18:33, 28F
→
07/06 18:34, , 29F
07/06 18:34, 29F
→
07/06 18:34, , 30F
07/06 18:34, 30F
→
07/06 18:34, , 31F
07/06 18:34, 31F
→
07/06 18:35, , 32F
07/06 18:35, 32F
噓
07/06 18:36, , 33F
07/06 18:36, 33F
推
07/06 18:36, , 34F
07/06 18:36, 34F
→
07/06 18:36, , 35F
07/06 18:36, 35F
→
07/06 18:36, , 36F
07/06 18:36, 36F
推
07/06 18:37, , 37F
07/06 18:37, 37F
→
07/06 18:37, , 38F
07/06 18:37, 38F
→
07/06 18:37, , 39F
07/06 18:37, 39F
還有 70 則推文
→
07/06 21:06, , 110F
07/06 21:06, 110F
→
07/06 21:07, , 111F
07/06 21:07, 111F
→
07/06 21:07, , 112F
07/06 21:07, 112F
→
07/06 21:07, , 113F
07/06 21:07, 113F
→
07/06 21:08, , 114F
07/06 21:08, 114F
→
07/06 21:11, , 115F
07/06 21:11, 115F
→
07/06 21:12, , 116F
07/06 21:12, 116F
→
07/06 21:15, , 117F
07/06 21:15, 117F
→
07/06 21:16, , 118F
07/06 21:16, 118F
→
07/06 21:17, , 119F
07/06 21:17, 119F
→
07/06 21:24, , 120F
07/06 21:24, 120F
→
07/06 21:24, , 121F
07/06 21:24, 121F
→
07/06 21:24, , 122F
07/06 21:24, 122F
→
07/06 21:24, , 123F
07/06 21:24, 123F
→
07/06 21:28, , 124F
07/06 21:28, 124F
→
07/06 21:28, , 125F
07/06 21:28, 125F
噓
07/06 21:47, , 126F
07/06 21:47, 126F
噓
07/06 21:51, , 127F
07/06 21:51, 127F
噓
07/06 21:54, , 128F
07/06 21:54, 128F
→
07/06 22:14, , 129F
07/06 22:14, 129F
→
07/06 22:15, , 130F
07/06 22:15, 130F
→
07/06 22:17, , 131F
07/06 22:17, 131F
→
07/06 22:22, , 132F
07/06 22:22, 132F
→
07/06 22:23, , 133F
07/06 22:23, 133F
→
07/06 22:24, , 134F
07/06 22:24, 134F
→
07/06 22:24, , 135F
07/06 22:24, 135F
→
07/06 22:24, , 136F
07/06 22:24, 136F
→
07/06 22:24, , 137F
07/06 22:24, 137F
噓
07/06 22:25, , 138F
07/06 22:25, 138F
→
07/06 22:26, , 139F
07/06 22:26, 139F
噓
07/06 22:34, , 140F
07/06 22:34, 140F
噓
07/06 22:46, , 141F
07/06 22:46, 141F
噓
07/06 22:58, , 142F
07/06 22:58, 142F
→
07/06 23:28, , 143F
07/06 23:28, 143F
推
07/06 23:28, , 144F
07/06 23:28, 144F
→
07/06 23:29, , 145F
07/06 23:29, 145F
噓
07/07 03:06, , 146F
07/07 03:06, 146F
噓
07/07 14:16, , 147F
07/07 14:16, 147F
→
07/07 20:40, , 148F
07/07 20:40, 148F
→
07/07 20:41, , 149F
07/07 20:41, 149F