[討論] 後天的裁判已回收
上一篇提到若熱火能撐過第六戰
那麼最大的利多就會是第七戰將由Dan Crawford來擔任主裁判
看到前六戰的裁判名單(括號內為備用裁判)
Game1 Monty McCutchen, Tony Brothers, Jason Philips, (Bill Kennedy)
Game2 Joe Crawford, Ed Malloy, Ken Mauer, (Marc Davis)
Game3 Dan Crawford, James Capers, Marc Davis, (Bill Kennedy)
Game4 Scott Foster, Mike Callahan, Bill Kennedy, (Jason Philips)
Game5 Monty McCutchen, Tony Brothers, Ed Malloy, (James Capers)
Game6 Joe Crawford, Mike Callahan, Ken Mauer, (Marc Davis)
總冠軍賽由12位裁判輪值
前四戰輪完後基本上第五戰會有兩位第一戰裁判 第六戰則有兩位第二戰裁判
第五戰第六戰的裁判基本上不會在第七戰出現
因此去掉五六戰的裁判後
第七戰就剩Dan Crawford, Scott Foster, Bill Kennedy, Jason Philips了
其中Dan Crawford跟Scott Foster是前四戰主裁判一定在名單內
剩下一位個人猜會是Bill Kennedy
(但也有可能是五六戰的主裁判Joe Crawford或Monty McCutchen)
也就是說 第七戰很可能是馬刺在12名裁判中最不想看到的三個
Dan Crawford, Scott Foster, Bill Kennedy
--
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 111.243.92.15
推
06/19 21:28, , 1F
06/19 21:28, 1F
推
06/19 21:28, , 2F
06/19 21:28, 2F
推
06/19 21:29, , 3F
06/19 21:29, 3F
噓
06/19 21:29, , 4F
06/19 21:29, 4F
推
06/19 21:30, , 5F
06/19 21:30, 5F
→
06/19 21:30, , 6F
06/19 21:30, 6F
噓
06/19 21:30, , 7F
06/19 21:30, 7F
→
06/19 21:31, , 8F
06/19 21:31, 8F
噓
06/19 21:31, , 9F
06/19 21:31, 9F
推
06/19 21:32, , 10F
06/19 21:32, 10F
噓
06/19 21:32, , 11F
06/19 21:32, 11F
噓
06/19 21:33, , 12F
06/19 21:33, 12F
噓
06/19 21:33, , 13F
06/19 21:33, 13F
→
06/19 21:33, , 14F
06/19 21:33, 14F
→
06/19 21:33, , 15F
06/19 21:33, 15F
噓
06/19 21:34, , 16F
06/19 21:34, 16F
→
06/19 21:34, , 17F
06/19 21:34, 17F
噓
06/19 21:34, , 18F
06/19 21:34, 18F
推
06/19 21:34, , 19F
06/19 21:34, 19F
→
06/19 21:34, , 20F
06/19 21:34, 20F
推
06/19 21:34, , 21F
06/19 21:34, 21F
推
06/19 21:34, , 22F
06/19 21:34, 22F
→
06/19 21:35, , 23F
06/19 21:35, 23F
→
06/19 21:35, , 24F
06/19 21:35, 24F
→
06/19 21:35, , 25F
06/19 21:35, 25F
→
06/19 21:35, , 26F
06/19 21:35, 26F
噓
06/19 21:35, , 27F
06/19 21:35, 27F
噓
06/19 21:36, , 28F
06/19 21:36, 28F
噓
06/19 21:36, , 29F
06/19 21:36, 29F
推
06/19 21:36, , 30F
06/19 21:36, 30F
推
06/19 21:36, , 31F
06/19 21:36, 31F
噓
06/19 21:37, , 32F
06/19 21:37, 32F
噓
06/19 21:37, , 33F
06/19 21:37, 33F
→
06/19 21:37, , 34F
06/19 21:37, 34F
噓
06/19 21:38, , 35F
06/19 21:38, 35F
推
06/19 21:38, , 36F
06/19 21:38, 36F
噓
06/19 21:38, , 37F
06/19 21:38, 37F
→
06/19 21:38, , 38F
06/19 21:38, 38F
→
06/19 21:39, , 39F
06/19 21:39, 39F
還有 133 則推文
噓
06/19 22:33, , 173F
06/19 22:33, 173F
推
06/19 22:34, , 174F
06/19 22:34, 174F
噓
06/19 22:34, , 175F
06/19 22:34, 175F
噓
06/19 22:35, , 176F
06/19 22:35, 176F
噓
06/19 22:37, , 177F
06/19 22:37, 177F
噓
06/19 22:38, , 178F
06/19 22:38, 178F
→
06/19 22:39, , 179F
06/19 22:39, 179F
噓
06/19 22:41, , 180F
06/19 22:41, 180F
推
06/19 22:43, , 181F
06/19 22:43, 181F
推
06/19 22:51, , 182F
06/19 22:51, 182F
推
06/19 22:51, , 183F
06/19 22:51, 183F
→
06/19 22:53, , 184F
06/19 22:53, 184F
噓
06/19 22:58, , 185F
06/19 22:58, 185F
→
06/19 22:58, , 186F
06/19 22:58, 186F
→
06/19 22:59, , 187F
06/19 22:59, 187F
看來在經過G6後 這篇反而挑動到一些人了
比較意外的是比起前面幾篇 這篇主要是推論G7的裁判會是誰而已
寫這系列就只是有空分享一下對裁判的觀察
基本上比較能寫的就標題這四位 只是剛好都吹總冠軍賽
火迷看了可能不舒服能理解 不過沒有刻意酸熱火的意思
這從8篇當中也是有2篇馬刺應該能看出來
比較有趣的是2篇馬刺幾乎沒啥噓
至於說主觀或刻意挑數據
主觀方面我想我都有附上客觀數據或影片
刻意挑數據的方面
假如只是因為熱火勝率高
那麼所有裁判吹的結果都該差不多 而非A裁判吹與其他有明顯之差距
如果認為因為馬刺勝率高也可找到同樣的數據
或許可以試著找找看來分享
而純就勝敗結果來看 8篇只G3錯邊也算是還好沒打臉太嚴重
※ 編輯: Hank2005 來自: 111.243.92.15 (06/19 23:32)
→
06/19 23:30, , 188F
06/19 23:30, 188F
推
06/19 23:34, , 189F
06/19 23:34, 189F
噓
06/19 23:42, , 190F
06/19 23:42, 190F
→
06/19 23:54, , 191F
06/19 23:54, 191F
推
06/20 00:00, , 192F
06/20 00:00, 192F
→
06/20 00:00, , 193F
06/20 00:00, 193F
推
06/20 00:04, , 194F
06/20 00:04, 194F
推
06/20 00:04, , 195F
06/20 00:04, 195F
→
06/20 00:05, , 196F
06/20 00:05, 196F
→
06/20 00:05, , 197F
06/20 00:05, 197F
→
06/20 00:05, , 198F
06/20 00:05, 198F
→
06/20 00:06, , 199F
06/20 00:06, 199F
→
06/20 00:07, , 200F
06/20 00:07, 200F
→
06/20 00:07, , 201F
06/20 00:07, 201F
→
06/20 00:08, , 202F
06/20 00:08, 202F
噓
06/20 00:11, , 203F
06/20 00:11, 203F
噓
06/20 00:13, , 204F
06/20 00:13, 204F
推
06/20 00:53, , 205F
06/20 00:53, 205F
推
06/20 01:01, , 206F
06/20 01:01, 206F
噓
06/20 01:19, , 207F
06/20 01:19, 207F
推
06/20 01:27, , 208F
06/20 01:27, 208F
推
06/20 02:34, , 209F
06/20 02:34, 209F
推
06/20 10:22, , 210F
06/20 10:22, 210F
推
06/20 21:33, , 211F
06/20 21:33, 211F