[討論] 少了林書豪的火箭,原來這麼強已回收
季後賽打雷霆前五戰,兩個後衛數據對照
PLAYERS MIN FGM-A 3PM-A FTM-A +/- OR DR TR AS PF ST TO BS BA PTS EFF
J. Lin G 32:29 1-7 0-4 2-2 -23 0 3 3 4 5 2 4 0 0 4 3
J. Lin G 19:38 3-7 1-3 0-0 + 1 0 4 4 3 2 0 2 0 0 7 8
J. Lin G 18:23 1-6 0-2 0-0 -23 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 2 -3
J. Lin DND Bruised Right Chest Muscle
J. Lin DND Bruised Right Chest Muscle
PLAYERS MIN FGM-A 3PM-A FTM-A +/- OR DR TR AS PF ST TO BS BA PTS EFF
Beverley 27:42 4-10 2-5 1-1 -18 1 3 4 4 4 2 1 0 1 11 1
Beverley G 41:13 7-13 2-4 0-0 + 2 5 7 12 6 4 2 3 1 2 16 28
Beverley G 22:07 3-10 0-3 0-0 + 9 0 2 2 3 5 0 0 1 1 6 5
Beverley G 37:00 5-10 2-4 4-4 + 6 1 3 4 3 3 1 0 1 1 16 20
Beverley G 38:55 5-11 2-5 2-2 + 3 3 5 8 1 4 1 1 1 0 14 18
火箭少了林書豪上場後整個一飛沖天起來,後兩場都壓著雷霆打...
結果今天第六場... 豪神一上就被連追九分
林書豪季賽不是有的打的不錯嗎? 怎麼會到季後賽落差這麼大?
少了林,火箭季後賽好像變的比較有競爭力@@
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 86.146.179.63
噓
05/04 10:58, , 1F
05/04 10:58, 1F
噓
05/04 10:58, , 2F
05/04 10:58, 2F
噓
05/04 10:58, , 3F
05/04 10:58, 3F
→
05/04 10:59, , 4F
05/04 10:59, 4F
噓
05/04 11:00, , 5F
05/04 11:00, 5F
噓
05/04 11:00, , 6F
05/04 11:00, 6F
推
05/04 11:00, , 7F
05/04 11:00, 7F
噓
05/04 11:01, , 8F
05/04 11:01, 8F
推
05/04 11:02, , 9F
05/04 11:02, 9F
噓
05/04 11:02, , 10F
05/04 11:02, 10F
噓
05/04 11:02, , 11F
05/04 11:02, 11F
噓
05/04 11:02, , 12F
05/04 11:02, 12F
推
05/04 11:03, , 13F
05/04 11:03, 13F
噓
05/04 11:03, , 14F
05/04 11:03, 14F
噓
05/04 11:03, , 15F
05/04 11:03, 15F
噓
05/04 11:04, , 16F
05/04 11:04, 16F
推
05/04 11:06, , 17F
05/04 11:06, 17F
噓
05/04 11:07, , 18F
05/04 11:07, 18F
推
05/04 11:07, , 19F
05/04 11:07, 19F
噓
05/04 11:07, , 20F
05/04 11:07, 20F
→
05/04 11:07, , 21F
05/04 11:07, 21F
推
05/04 11:07, , 22F
05/04 11:07, 22F
噓
05/04 11:07, , 23F
05/04 11:07, 23F
→
05/04 11:08, , 24F
05/04 11:08, 24F
→
05/04 11:08, , 25F
05/04 11:08, 25F
推
05/04 11:08, , 26F
05/04 11:08, 26F
→
05/04 11:08, , 27F
05/04 11:08, 27F
噓
05/04 11:10, , 28F
05/04 11:10, 28F
噓
05/04 11:10, , 29F
05/04 11:10, 29F
噓
05/04 11:11, , 30F
05/04 11:11, 30F
噓
05/04 11:11, , 31F
05/04 11:11, 31F
噓
05/04 11:11, , 32F
05/04 11:11, 32F
噓
05/04 11:11, , 33F
05/04 11:11, 33F
推
05/04 11:11, , 34F
05/04 11:11, 34F
推
05/04 11:11, , 35F
05/04 11:11, 35F
噓
05/04 11:11, , 36F
05/04 11:11, 36F
推
05/04 11:12, , 37F
05/04 11:12, 37F
噓
05/04 11:12, , 38F
05/04 11:12, 38F
推
05/04 11:12, , 39F
05/04 11:12, 39F
推
05/04 11:13, , 40F
05/04 11:13, 40F
噓
05/04 11:14, , 41F
05/04 11:14, 41F
推
05/04 11:14, , 42F
05/04 11:14, 42F
噓
05/04 11:14, , 43F
05/04 11:14, 43F
→
05/04 11:15, , 44F
05/04 11:15, 44F
噓
05/04 11:15, , 45F
05/04 11:15, 45F
→
05/04 11:16, , 46F
05/04 11:16, 46F
推
05/04 11:16, , 47F
05/04 11:16, 47F
推
05/04 11:16, , 48F
05/04 11:16, 48F
噓
05/04 11:16, , 49F
05/04 11:16, 49F
推
05/04 11:16, , 50F
05/04 11:16, 50F
推
05/04 11:16, , 51F
05/04 11:16, 51F
噓
05/04 11:17, , 52F
05/04 11:17, 52F
推
05/04 11:17, , 53F
05/04 11:17, 53F
噓
05/04 11:18, , 54F
05/04 11:18, 54F
噓
05/04 11:18, , 55F
05/04 11:18, 55F
推
05/04 11:18, , 56F
05/04 11:18, 56F
推
05/04 11:18, , 57F
05/04 11:18, 57F
噓
05/04 11:19, , 58F
05/04 11:19, 58F
推
05/04 11:20, , 59F
05/04 11:20, 59F
推
05/04 11:20, , 60F
05/04 11:20, 60F
噓
05/04 11:20, , 61F
05/04 11:20, 61F
推
05/04 11:22, , 62F
05/04 11:22, 62F
推
05/04 11:23, , 63F
05/04 11:23, 63F
→
05/04 11:23, , 64F
05/04 11:23, 64F
推
05/04 11:33, , 65F
05/04 11:33, 65F
→
05/04 11:33, , 66F
05/04 11:33, 66F
→
05/04 11:34, , 67F
05/04 11:34, 67F
→
05/04 11:34, , 68F
05/04 11:34, 68F
→
05/04 11:35, , 69F
05/04 11:35, 69F
推
05/04 11:36, , 70F
05/04 11:36, 70F
推
05/04 11:38, , 71F
05/04 11:38, 71F