[討論] 我們會不會都誤會kobe了?已回收
我們會不會都誤會kobe了?
之前看大家一直說西河繼承了kobe的打鐵
就連守住了球隊裡面的老大也是如出一轍
所以沒有西河的雷霆才是完全體 才是最強的雷霆
就如同沒有kobe的湖人才是最強的湖人
但這個論點現在受到極大的質疑
因為在西河受傷之後 雖然就如同鄉民所說少了一人打鐵
而KD受到解放 但從另外一個角度來看
雷霆整支球隊的破壞力下降了一個檔次 而防守者也可以有更多精力去守KD
所以現在連火箭能夠絕地大反攻的討論都出現了
就可以知道雷霆少了西河差了不少
同樣的 這個情形也可以套用在湖人身上
如果沒有KOBE 湖人在進攻方面就少了一個人打開僵局
所以說 以前說的沒有KOBE湖人會比較強 應該是個誤會
大家覺得呢?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 220.141.126.153
噓
05/02 09:39, , 1F
05/02 09:39, 1F
推
05/02 09:40, , 2F
05/02 09:40, 2F
→
05/02 09:40, , 3F
05/02 09:40, 3F
噓
05/02 09:40, , 4F
05/02 09:40, 4F
噓
05/02 09:41, , 5F
05/02 09:41, 5F
推
05/02 09:42, , 6F
05/02 09:42, 6F
→
05/02 09:42, , 7F
05/02 09:42, 7F
噓
05/02 09:43, , 8F
05/02 09:43, 8F
→
05/02 09:43, , 9F
05/02 09:43, 9F
噓
05/02 09:43, , 10F
05/02 09:43, 10F
→
05/02 09:43, , 11F
05/02 09:43, 11F
→
05/02 09:43, , 12F
05/02 09:43, 12F
→
05/02 09:44, , 13F
05/02 09:44, 13F
你都說沒空討論還回了兩句.. 目前你回最多..莫非你是傲嬌..
推
05/02 09:45, , 14F
05/02 09:45, 14F
噓
05/02 09:46, , 15F
05/02 09:46, 15F
→
05/02 09:46, , 16F
05/02 09:46, 16F
噓
05/02 09:47, , 17F
05/02 09:47, 17F
→
05/02 09:47, , 18F
05/02 09:47, 18F
→
05/02 09:47, , 19F
05/02 09:47, 19F
回了四句 也太傲嬌XDDDDDDDDDDDD
推
05/02 09:49, , 20F
05/02 09:49, 20F
→
05/02 09:49, , 21F
05/02 09:49, 21F
哈哈 你繼續 我沒關係XDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
→
05/02 09:49, , 22F
05/02 09:49, 22F
嗯 那我猜六句
→
05/02 09:50, , 23F
05/02 09:50, 23F
那我猜七句
推
05/02 09:50, , 24F
05/02 09:50, 24F
就跟你說他傲嬌呀..XDD 一開始說沒空還回七句XDD
推
05/02 09:51, , 25F
05/02 09:51, 25F
→
05/02 09:51, , 26F
05/02 09:51, 26F
→
05/02 09:51, , 27F
05/02 09:51, 27F
→
05/02 09:51, , 28F
05/02 09:51, 28F
→
05/02 09:52, , 29F
05/02 09:52, 29F
嗯 對呀 你好強喔 我好崇拜你 九句男~
噓
05/02 09:52, , 30F
05/02 09:52, 30F
推
05/02 09:53, , 31F
05/02 09:53, 31F
→
05/02 09:53, , 32F
05/02 09:53, 32F
哪方面的 PTT推文傳說?
推
05/02 09:53, , 33F
05/02 09:53, 33F
噓
05/02 09:54, , 34F
05/02 09:54, 34F
→
05/02 09:54, , 35F
05/02 09:54, 35F
知道什麼..?
→
05/02 09:55, , 36F
05/02 09:55, 36F
我剛剛問了 她說有一個變態一直騷擾她 莫非就是.....
※ 編輯: b9002052 來自: 220.141.126.153 (05/02 09:56)
→
05/02 09:57, , 37F
05/02 09:57, 37F
推
05/02 09:58, , 38F
05/02 09:58, 38F
噓
05/02 09:59, , 39F
05/02 09:59, 39F
噓
05/02 10:01, , 40F
05/02 10:01, 40F
→
05/02 10:03, , 41F
05/02 10:03, 41F
→
05/02 10:04, , 42F
05/02 10:04, 42F
噓
05/02 10:04, , 43F
05/02 10:04, 43F
推
05/02 10:07, , 44F
05/02 10:07, 44F
噓
05/02 10:11, , 45F
05/02 10:11, 45F
→
05/02 10:25, , 46F
05/02 10:25, 46F
推
05/02 10:46, , 47F
05/02 10:46, 47F
推
05/02 10:52, , 48F
05/02 10:52, 48F
推
05/02 11:27, , 49F
05/02 11:27, 49F
→
05/02 11:28, , 50F
05/02 11:28, 50F
推
05/02 11:47, , 51F
05/02 11:47, 51F
→
05/02 11:48, , 52F
05/02 11:48, 52F
推
05/02 12:00, , 53F
05/02 12:00, 53F
推
05/02 12:13, , 54F
05/02 12:13, 54F
推
05/02 12:34, , 55F
05/02 12:34, 55F
噓
05/02 12:39, , 56F
05/02 12:39, 56F
推
05/02 13:20, , 57F
05/02 13:20, 57F
推
05/02 13:20, , 58F
05/02 13:20, 58F
噓
05/02 13:44, , 59F
05/02 13:44, 59F
推
05/02 14:16, , 60F
05/02 14:16, 60F
噓
05/02 18:48, , 61F
05/02 18:48, 61F
→
05/04 07:02, , 62F
05/04 07:02, 62F