Re: [討論] 如何擊敗這個無限連勝的熱火已回收
以目前的老賽 想打贏狀況那麼好的熱火 根本 不˙可˙能
不知道那麼多人說的塞隊想打斷熱火連勝興致勃勃的根據哪來的
包皮在那篇文章的重點"不在乎對手連勝多少",主要也是在提自己的隊伍還在調整
畢竟塞隊這季真的是老的老、傷的傷、歸隊的也還在調整。
根本沒那個本錢去和現在那隻狀況好、默契佳的生化人部隊嗆聲
會說塞隊想打斷熱火連勝的我覺得大部分是狂熱球迷自己的腦補吧
LBJ說過在他的眼裡東區最大的敵人是波士頓,雷槍又是在這季不歡而散才過去的
(雖然那個波士頓以經不是現在的波士頓了)
拿來破紀錄當祭品的對象全聯盟除了塞隊,我覺得沒有第二個更適合了
對熱火而言打贏這場的爽度,絕對比接連下來再拿5連勝的爽度更高.
拆你巨頭、搶你的雷槍,然後在你的頭上烙下破聯盟連勝的紀錄。
還有什麼比這更爽的呢?
------
雖然感覺記者和聯盟試著要炒一些話題性增以加收視率
但話題性是要在雙方有著對等的實力和待遇下才有可能精采
以現在的熱火要找到實力相當的隊伍,真的不太容易.....
而乾兒子、零容忍、沒牌球員灌個籃吼一下就吃T、比讚就罰五萬,這種環境下
哪個球員會傻傻的跟自己的荷包過不去,反正都給你聯盟玩就好啦
我就球來就打,安安靜靜的領我的薪水就好,幹嘛隨著聯盟起舞
以我認識的包皮、以前根本不可能這麼含蓄說話的
他都是標準放話被打臉、然後安靜一陣子還是一直愛放話的
其實還頗懷念以前大牌球星放話,然後到場上被打臉的時光....
去你的娘砲聯盟,球星不被打臉,我們酸酸就沒有糧食可吃了,知道嗎?
回歸主題,對塞隊而言,破連勝有獎金嗎?傷兵就能回來嗎?
隊伍實力戰績就能起飛嗎?
對塞隊而言 健康第一,首輪別遇到熱火第二,大概就是接下來賽程的唯二目標了
雖然很消極,但這就是現實,畢竟拳怕少壯,PP、KG再傷的話,塞隊今年就是陪打年了
然後明年又老了一歲,又可能要陪打一年了.....
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.42.138.57
→
03/18 17:54, , 1F
03/18 17:54, 1F
推
03/18 17:54, , 2F
03/18 17:54, 2F
推
03/18 17:55, , 3F
03/18 17:55, 3F
推
03/18 17:56, , 4F
03/18 17:56, 4F
推
03/18 17:58, , 5F
03/18 17:58, 5F
推
03/18 18:00, , 6F
03/18 18:00, 6F
推
03/18 18:01, , 7F
03/18 18:01, 7F
→
03/18 18:01, , 8F
03/18 18:01, 8F
噓
03/18 18:05, , 9F
03/18 18:05, 9F
推
03/18 18:06, , 10F
03/18 18:06, 10F
→
03/18 18:07, , 11F
03/18 18:07, 11F
→
03/18 18:09, , 12F
03/18 18:09, 12F
推
03/18 18:10, , 13F
03/18 18:10, 13F
推
03/18 18:12, , 14F
03/18 18:12, 14F
噓
03/18 18:12, , 15F
03/18 18:12, 15F
推
03/18 18:16, , 16F
03/18 18:16, 16F
→
03/18 18:16, , 17F
03/18 18:16, 17F
→
03/18 18:17, , 18F
03/18 18:17, 18F
推
03/18 18:18, , 19F
03/18 18:18, 19F
→
03/18 18:18, , 20F
03/18 18:18, 20F
→
03/18 18:19, , 21F
03/18 18:19, 21F
推
03/18 18:20, , 22F
03/18 18:20, 22F
→
03/18 18:22, , 23F
03/18 18:22, 23F
→
03/18 18:24, , 24F
03/18 18:24, 24F
推
03/18 18:24, , 25F
03/18 18:24, 25F
→
03/18 18:24, , 26F
03/18 18:24, 26F
→
03/18 18:25, , 27F
03/18 18:25, 27F
→
03/18 18:25, , 28F
03/18 18:25, 28F
→
03/18 18:25, , 29F
03/18 18:25, 29F
推
03/18 18:26, , 30F
03/18 18:26, 30F
→
03/18 18:26, , 31F
03/18 18:26, 31F
推
03/18 18:26, , 32F
03/18 18:26, 32F
→
03/18 18:26, , 33F
03/18 18:26, 33F
→
03/18 18:27, , 34F
03/18 18:27, 34F
→
03/18 18:28, , 35F
03/18 18:28, 35F
推
03/18 18:28, , 36F
03/18 18:28, 36F
※ 編輯: keypad 來自: 114.42.138.57 (03/18 18:29)
→
03/18 18:28, , 37F
03/18 18:28, 37F
推
03/18 18:29, , 38F
03/18 18:29, 38F
→
03/18 18:30, , 39F
03/18 18:30, 39F
→
03/18 18:31, , 40F
03/18 18:31, 40F
→
03/18 18:31, , 41F
03/18 18:31, 41F
推
03/18 18:33, , 42F
03/18 18:33, 42F
噓
03/18 18:33, , 43F
03/18 18:33, 43F
→
03/18 18:35, , 44F
03/18 18:35, 44F
推
03/18 18:40, , 45F
03/18 18:40, 45F
噓
03/18 18:46, , 46F
03/18 18:46, 46F
→
03/18 18:47, , 47F
03/18 18:47, 47F
推
03/18 18:48, , 48F
03/18 18:48, 48F
噓
03/18 18:48, , 49F
03/18 18:48, 49F
推
03/18 18:49, , 50F
03/18 18:49, 50F
→
03/18 18:56, , 51F
03/18 18:56, 51F
→
03/18 18:58, , 52F
03/18 18:58, 52F
推
03/18 18:59, , 53F
03/18 18:59, 53F
※ 編輯: keypad 來自: 114.42.138.57 (03/18 19:05)
推
03/18 19:14, , 54F
03/18 19:14, 54F
推
03/18 19:24, , 55F
03/18 19:24, 55F
推
03/18 19:29, , 56F
03/18 19:29, 56F
→
03/18 19:30, , 57F
03/18 19:30, 57F
→
03/18 19:31, , 58F
03/18 19:31, 58F
推
03/18 19:32, , 59F
03/18 19:32, 59F
→
03/18 19:44, , 60F
03/18 19:44, 60F
→
03/18 19:44, , 61F
03/18 19:44, 61F
→
03/18 19:44, , 62F
03/18 19:44, 62F
推
03/18 19:48, , 63F
03/18 19:48, 63F
推
03/18 19:49, , 64F
03/18 19:49, 64F
→
03/18 19:49, , 65F
03/18 19:49, 65F
推
03/18 20:38, , 66F
03/18 20:38, 66F
噓
03/18 20:48, , 67F
03/18 20:48, 67F
推
03/18 20:51, , 68F
03/18 20:51, 68F
推
03/18 21:11, , 69F
03/18 21:11, 69F
噓
03/18 21:20, , 70F
03/18 21:20, 70F
推
03/18 22:06, , 71F
03/18 22:06, 71F
噓
03/18 22:22, , 72F
03/18 22:22, 72F
→
03/18 22:37, , 73F
03/18 22:37, 73F
噓
03/18 23:01, , 74F
03/18 23:01, 74F
噓
03/18 23:31, , 75F
03/18 23:31, 75F
噓
03/19 00:05, , 76F
03/19 00:05, 76F
→
03/19 00:06, , 77F
03/19 00:06, 77F
噓
03/19 00:33, , 78F
03/19 00:33, 78F
噓
03/19 00:49, , 79F
03/19 00:49, 79F
推
03/19 12:57, , 80F
03/19 12:57, 80F
推
03/19 15:49, , 81F
03/19 15:49, 81F
噓
03/19 20:53, , 82F
03/19 20:53, 82F
噓
10/29 16:39, , 83F
10/29 16:39, 83F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 3 篇):
討論
6
115