[外絮] 老大對Fisher回鍋感到不悅已回收
Kobe Bryant comments on Derek Fisher's return
to the NBA as a member of OKC.
http://goo.gl/XRj0l
Kamenetzky Brothers
After Wednesday's practice in El Segundo, Kobe Bryant was asked about his old
and close friend Derek Fisher latching on with the Thunder for the second
time in two seasons. While I doubt Kobe bears any serious grudge against
likely the best friend he's ever made in the league, he didn't bother hiding
any distaste for seeing Fish don the uni of a rival.
星期三的練習結束後,Kobe被談到與摯友Derek Fisher在這兩季與雷霆隊間的一切動作
。一開始我(記者)懷疑Kobe是否會對Fisher,這個或許是他在聯盟中難得交得到的好朋
友感到怨恨,Kobe毫無隱藏他厭惡看到了Fisher變成了對手
Here's how the media scrum exchange went down:
以下是訪談內容:
Reporter #1: Are you glad Fisher's back in the NBA?
記者一:Fisher的回歸是否讓你感到開心?
Bryant: No.
科比:不
Reporter #2: Are you surprised he's back?
記者二:你對於Fisher回來感到驚訝嗎?
Bryant: No.
科比:不
Reporter #2: Are you surprised he came back with Oklahoma City?
記者二:你對於Fisher回歸雷霆感到驚訝嗎?
Bryant: Well, that's probably why I'm not happy about it. But no, he's been
staying in shape the whole time. It was a tough year for him last year
because he had to deal with all the B.S. going on with the lockout, so it was
a very hard summer for him to get in shape and stay focused on the game. He's
ready to go. hHe's been training the whole and he looks in shape and he's
ready to play. So I'm sure he'll make a big contribution.
科比:這就是我不爽的地方,但不,他一直都在保持他的身體狀況。去年對他來說是相當
辛苦的一年,因為他必須在封館時處理很多的事情,所以他很難在去年夏天保持他的體能
還有對於場上的專注。他已經準備好了,我想他會帶來很大的貢獻。
Again, I doubt there's any true animosity between the longtime teammates.
(Mark Cuban and Fisher? That may be another story.) Between Steves Blake and
Nash, plus Jodie Meeks, there's no spot available for Fisher, nor a pressing
need for his services. Sentimental favorite that Fish may be, it's hard to
make a serious argument this team has really missed his talents since last
season's departure to Houston. Even his value as a leader would be undercut
in a marginalized role. (And frankly, if this many accomplished veterans
still require Fisher to serve as a Moses/security blanket hybrid, they're
probably a lost cause, anyway.)
再一次,我對於科比與Fisher之間是否有敵意感到懷疑(Fisher和Cuban又是另個故事)。
湖人已經有了Nash,Blake還有Jodie Meeks,沒有空間再給Fisher發揮。另一方面,湖人
真的會想要Fisher嗎?上一季把老漁交易到火箭讓人不禁這麼懷疑。即使是老漁的領袖價
值到了現在的湖人也會被邊緣化。
Kobe's smart enough to know Fisher doesn't really fit with the Lakers
anymore. It's just never easy to see a buddy aligned with the enemy, and a
formidable one at that.
Kobe非常的聰明,知道Fisher已經不再適合湖人了,只是看著好友與自己背道而馳加入
了非常強大的敵人總是難過的。
AK
短評或心得:第一句是....婀? 第二句是....阿? 第三句是....?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.124.77.166
推
03/01 15:55, , 1F
03/01 15:55, 1F
推
03/01 15:55, , 2F
03/01 15:55, 2F
→
03/01 15:55, , 3F
03/01 15:55, 3F
推
03/01 15:55, , 4F
03/01 15:55, 4F
推
03/01 15:55, , 5F
03/01 15:55, 5F
推
03/01 15:56, , 6F
03/01 15:56, 6F
推
03/01 15:56, , 7F
03/01 15:56, 7F
→
03/01 15:56, , 8F
03/01 15:56, 8F
→
03/01 15:56, , 9F
03/01 15:56, 9F
推
03/01 15:56, , 10F
03/01 15:56, 10F
→
03/01 15:57, , 11F
03/01 15:57, 11F
推
03/01 15:57, , 12F
03/01 15:57, 12F
推
03/01 15:59, , 13F
03/01 15:59, 13F
推
03/01 16:00, , 14F
03/01 16:00, 14F
推
03/01 16:00, , 15F
03/01 16:00, 15F
→
03/01 16:01, , 16F
03/01 16:01, 16F
推
03/01 16:02, , 17F
03/01 16:02, 17F
推
03/01 16:03, , 18F
03/01 16:03, 18F
→
03/01 16:05, , 19F
03/01 16:05, 19F
推
03/01 16:07, , 20F
03/01 16:07, 20F
→
03/01 16:07, , 21F
03/01 16:07, 21F
推
03/01 16:22, , 22F
03/01 16:22, 22F
推
03/01 16:28, , 23F
03/01 16:28, 23F
推
03/01 16:44, , 24F
03/01 16:44, 24F
推
03/01 16:44, , 25F
03/01 16:44, 25F
推
03/01 17:10, , 26F
03/01 17:10, 26F
→
03/01 17:10, , 27F
03/01 17:10, 27F
→
03/01 17:11, , 28F
03/01 17:11, 28F
→
03/01 17:11, , 29F
03/01 17:11, 29F
推
03/01 17:15, , 30F
03/01 17:15, 30F
推
03/01 17:17, , 31F
03/01 17:17, 31F
推
03/01 17:20, , 32F
03/01 17:20, 32F
推
03/01 17:38, , 33F
03/01 17:38, 33F
→
03/01 17:47, , 34F
03/01 17:47, 34F
推
03/01 17:48, , 35F
03/01 17:48, 35F
推
03/01 17:51, , 36F
03/01 17:51, 36F
→
03/01 18:29, , 37F
03/01 18:29, 37F
→
03/01 18:30, , 38F
03/01 18:30, 38F
→
03/01 18:31, , 39F
03/01 18:31, 39F
推
03/01 18:46, , 40F
03/01 18:46, 40F
→
03/01 19:24, , 41F
03/01 19:24, 41F
推
03/01 19:38, , 42F
03/01 19:38, 42F
噓
03/01 20:48, , 43F
03/01 20:48, 43F
推
03/01 23:54, , 44F
03/01 23:54, 44F
推
03/02 02:00, , 45F
03/02 02:00, 45F