[討論] 手機的護眼重要性
大大好
我知道我這個討論很小眾
但是連高通都出comfort view
一堆公司都出藍光過濾器了
為什麼 沒有公司在乎手機閃屏這件事
pwm控光技術一直是造成人眼嚴重傷害的主要原因之一
***跟子龍的手機全部都有嚴重的閃屏問題
可是好像完全沒有人care
眼睛就這樣燒燒燒
然後玩手機在一直開藍光過濾器說要守護眼睛
我下一支手機一定要買不閃屏手機
有人會真的care這種事嗎
-----
Sent from JPTT on my Samsung SM-N910U.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 101.10.51.115
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/MobileComm/M.1473948951.A.66E.html
推
09/15 22:16, , 1F
09/15 22:16, 1F
→
09/15 22:18, , 2F
09/15 22:18, 2F
→
09/15 22:18, , 3F
09/15 22:18, 3F
→
09/15 22:19, , 4F
09/15 22:19, 4F
→
09/15 22:20, , 5F
09/15 22:20, 5F
→
09/15 22:20, , 6F
09/15 22:20, 6F
→
09/15 22:20, , 7F
09/15 22:20, 7F
→
09/15 22:21, , 8F
09/15 22:21, 8F
→
09/15 22:24, , 9F
09/15 22:24, 9F
→
09/15 22:25, , 10F
09/15 22:25, 10F
推
09/15 22:25, , 11F
09/15 22:25, 11F
→
09/15 22:25, , 12F
09/15 22:25, 12F
→
09/15 22:26, , 13F
09/15 22:26, 13F
→
09/15 22:27, , 14F
09/15 22:27, 14F
→
09/15 22:27, , 15F
09/15 22:27, 15F
→
09/15 22:27, , 16F
09/15 22:27, 16F
→
09/15 22:27, , 17F
09/15 22:27, 17F
→
09/15 22:28, , 18F
09/15 22:28, 18F
→
09/15 22:28, , 19F
09/15 22:28, 19F
→
09/15 22:29, , 20F
09/15 22:29, 20F
→
09/15 22:29, , 21F
09/15 22:29, 21F
推
09/15 22:34, , 22F
09/15 22:34, 22F
推
09/15 22:36, , 23F
09/15 22:36, 23F
推
09/15 22:47, , 24F
09/15 22:47, 24F
→
09/15 22:47, , 25F
09/15 22:47, 25F
→
09/15 22:47, , 26F
09/15 22:47, 26F
→
09/15 22:48, , 27F
09/15 22:48, 27F
→
09/15 22:51, , 28F
09/15 22:51, 28F
推
09/15 22:54, , 29F
09/15 22:54, 29F
→
09/15 22:54, , 30F
09/15 22:54, 30F
→
09/15 23:05, , 31F
09/15 23:05, 31F
→
09/15 23:05, , 32F
09/15 23:05, 32F
→
09/15 23:05, , 33F
09/15 23:05, 33F
→
09/15 23:05, , 34F
09/15 23:05, 34F
→
09/15 23:05, , 35F
09/15 23:05, 35F
→
09/15 23:07, , 36F
09/15 23:07, 36F
→
09/15 23:07, , 37F
09/15 23:07, 37F
→
09/15 23:07, , 38F
09/15 23:07, 38F
推
09/15 23:12, , 39F
09/15 23:12, 39F
還有 38 則推文
→
09/16 03:03, , 78F
09/16 03:03, 78F
推
09/16 03:16, , 79F
09/16 03:16, 79F
→
09/16 03:16, , 80F
09/16 03:16, 80F
→
09/16 03:27, , 81F
09/16 03:27, 81F
→
09/16 03:42, , 82F
09/16 03:42, 82F
→
09/16 08:41, , 83F
09/16 08:41, 83F
推
09/16 08:50, , 84F
09/16 08:50, 84F
→
09/16 08:50, , 85F
09/16 08:50, 85F
→
09/16 09:21, , 86F
09/16 09:21, 86F
→
09/16 09:21, , 87F
09/16 09:21, 87F
→
09/16 09:21, , 88F
09/16 09:21, 88F
→
09/16 09:21, , 89F
09/16 09:21, 89F
推
09/16 09:37, , 90F
09/16 09:37, 90F
推
09/16 09:55, , 91F
09/16 09:55, 91F
→
09/16 09:55, , 92F
09/16 09:55, 92F
→
09/16 10:06, , 93F
09/16 10:06, 93F
→
09/16 10:06, , 94F
09/16 10:06, 94F
推
09/16 10:09, , 95F
09/16 10:09, 95F
→
09/16 10:28, , 96F
09/16 10:28, 96F
→
09/16 11:42, , 97F
09/16 11:42, 97F
推
09/16 12:31, , 98F
09/16 12:31, 98F
推
09/16 12:35, , 99F
09/16 12:35, 99F
你看看這台影片中的子龍 他在某些時刻會有一條一條的在螢幕上
這就是PWM眼睛殺手 沒有的話恭喜 有的話幫你QQ
※ 編輯: c52chungyuny (123.192.3.214), 09/16/2016 12:39:50
※ 編輯: c52chungyuny (123.192.3.214), 09/16/2016 12:40:48
→
09/16 12:55, , 100F
09/16 12:55, 100F
→
09/16 12:57, , 101F
09/16 12:57, 101F
→
09/16 12:57, , 102F
09/16 12:57, 102F
我知道真正的PWM必須要利用oscilloscope直接看示波器結果比較準 但不知道你說的頻率是duty cycle的頻率還是光譜的頻率的aliasing 我只是看很多評測說用鉛筆跟相機可以測 自己也做過很多次實驗 相機拍的到的Oscilloscope通常也會說沒有pwm pwm會傷眼早就眾所皆知 日光燈我當然不怕 我又不會跟日光燈距離30公分一直盯著看 想想PWM+VR 結局應該很可怕
推
09/16 12:59, , 103F
09/16 12:59, 103F
※ 編輯: c52chungyuny (123.192.3.214), 09/16/2016 13:10:55
※ 編輯: c52chungyuny (123.192.3.214), 09/16/2016 13:12:42
※ 編輯: c52chungyuny (123.192.3.214), 09/16/2016 13:13:53
推
09/16 16:27, , 104F
09/16 16:27, 104F
推
09/16 16:29, , 105F
09/16 16:29, 105F
→
09/16 16:30, , 106F
09/16 16:30, 106F
→
09/16 17:33, , 107F
09/16 17:33, 107F
→
09/16 21:04, , 108F
09/16 21:04, 108F
→
09/16 21:05, , 109F
09/16 21:05, 109F
→
09/16 22:19, , 110F
09/16 22:19, 110F
推
09/17 04:35, , 111F
09/17 04:35, 111F
推
09/17 13:14, , 112F
09/17 13:14, 112F
→
09/17 13:25, , 113F
09/17 13:25, 113F
→
09/17 13:25, , 114F
09/17 13:25, 114F