[外電] Should Mavs try to trade for Shaquille O'Neal?

看板Mavericks作者 (POP先生)時間16年前 (2009/05/19 11:29), 編輯推噓22(22027)
留言49則, 14人參與, 最新討論串1/1
http://tinyurl.com/qajp5j The Mavs might be able to get the best big man of this generation by sending Erick Dampier and Jerry Stackhouse to the Suns. That deal, assuming Phoenix would buy out Stack, would represent eight-figure savings to Suns owner Robert Sarver. That could free up money to sign Amare Stoudemire to a long-term extension, instead of trading their franchise player and beginning a rebuilding project. From the Mavs' perspective, they're replacing a mediocre big man with a legend. What's not to like? Well, the legend is no longer a dominant force. Shaq still puts up pretty good numbers (17.8 ppg, 8.4 rpg last season), but he's a major defensive liability. Replacing Damp with Shaq is a significant step in the wrong direction as far as accomplishing the Mavs' mission of improving on the defensive end. You could argue that Shaq's low-post presence more than makes up for what the Mavs would lose on the other end of the floor. But you can't rationally say that 37-year-old Shaq, who has missed more than 10 games in six of the last eight seasons, makes the Mavs legitimate contenders. I'd love to see Shaq come to Dallas, just for the entertainment value. He's one of the great characters in sports today, so it'd make my job easy and enjoyable. Mark Cuban enjoys the Shaq act, too, but he threw water on a brush fire of Shaq-to-Dallas speculation this spring. Cuban has made it clear that he's willing to lose a lot of money in a deal that makes the Mavs much better. I'm not sure that getting Shaq, even as a salary dump, falls in that category. 專欄作家寫的 又是小牛是否該交易來Oneal的議題 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 220.131.224.157

05/19 11:38, , 1F
再炒短線嘛 再炒嘛
05/19 11:38, 1F

05/19 11:41, , 2F
炒這個短線也沒啥用吧!
05/19 11:41, 2F

05/19 11:43, , 3F
清薪資...
05/19 11:43, 3F

05/19 11:46, , 4F
喔對吼 都忘記了@@
05/19 11:46, 4F

05/19 11:47, , 5F
小牛如果想拼1011的FA...確實也該清一清薪資..
05/19 11:47, 5F

05/19 11:47, , 6F
如果本季沒動作的話,0910應該會比0809季慘
05/19 11:47, 6F

05/19 11:48, , 7F
不過太陽隊....應該沒道理要放掉...這篇也是專欄
05/19 11:48, 7F

05/19 11:48, , 8F
以小牛立場一廂情願的交易@@
05/19 11:48, 8F

05/19 12:26, , 9F
大歐的話....一定要用到小豪吧..kidd人家不會要
05/19 12:26, 9F

05/19 12:33, , 10F
比起大歐我還比較想要Nash XD
05/19 12:33, 10F

05/19 12:34, , 11F
和Kidd同時在場上->達拉斯神出鬼沒傳球隊
05/19 12:34, 11F

05/19 12:39, , 12F
KIDD 來 NASH 來 一樣
05/19 12:39, 12F

05/19 12:39, , 13F
現在已經很少看到跑轟 經過AJ變成攻守均衡(有嗎?還是
05/19 12:39, 13F

05/19 12:40, , 14F
爆很大 爆不用錢) 小牛目前真的很不適合這種PG
05/19 12:40, 14F

05/19 12:41, , 15F
這是根本打法的問題 如果KIDD的明年走掉到別隊
05/19 12:41, 15F

05/19 12:42, , 16F
數據應該會大升...我猜猜拉
05/19 12:42, 16F

05/19 13:01, , 17F
大升是能升到多少....15分15助攻嘛
05/19 13:01, 17F

05/19 13:02, , 18F
http://tinyurl.com/y4bys7 近幾年數據差距不大
05/19 13:02, 18F

05/19 13:07, , 19F
一樣?NASH很準好媽
05/19 13:07, 19F

05/19 13:12, , 20F
AJ來的第一和第二年 確實防守差很多
05/19 13:12, 20F

05/19 13:26, , 21F
其實我也覺得Nash來對小牛幫助有限 只是私心XD
05/19 13:26, 21F

05/19 13:29, , 22F
畢竟當年的小牛和現在的小牛已經完全不一樣了
05/19 13:29, 22F

05/19 15:05, , 23F
http://0rz.tw/nWSNJ 這樣炒短線應該夠刺激!!
05/19 15:05, 23F

05/19 15:08, , 24F
DAL out:蛋皮,JET,S-Will,Carroll in: 大歐,T-mac
05/19 15:08, 24F

05/19 15:09, , 25F
PHX out:大歐 in:蛋皮,Carroll,S-Will,Lowry
05/19 15:09, 25F

05/19 15:11, , 26F
HOU out:T-mac,Lowry in:JET,Stackhouse(from DAL)
05/19 15:11, 26F

05/19 15:11, , 27F
Nash來小牛進攻會升級,Kidd得分能力應該是退化了
05/19 15:11, 27F

05/19 15:13, , 28F
05/19 15:13, 28F

05/19 15:16, , 29F
Nash回來就是走回頭路了 當年拿去換Kidd的不是更強?
05/19 15:16, 29F

05/19 15:18, , 30F
不認為Nash來會比較好,他的防守差Kidd很多,跟卡帥的
05/19 15:18, 30F

05/19 15:18, , 31F
執教風格可說是完全不同~
05/19 15:18, 31F

05/19 15:36, , 32F
老實說 JK現在的防守跟Nash比不會差多少了
05/19 15:36, 32F

05/19 15:42, , 33F
不過樓樓上那個網頁滿好玩的XD
05/19 15:42, 33F

05/19 15:55, , 34F
Tmac....不太敢賭...他的約也很嚇人
05/19 15:55, 34F

05/19 16:07, , 35F
T-mac+大歐,就算都爆掉了明年暑假也可一次出40M!!
05/19 16:07, 35F

05/19 16:25, , 36F
40M魂!
05/19 16:25, 36F

05/19 17:26, , 37F
呵呵 賭個合約年也挺有趣的XD
05/19 17:26, 37F

05/19 17:40, , 38F
不錯唷...要賭就一口氣賭大的!~明年賽季結束蛋皮的
05/19 17:40, 38F

05/19 17:41, , 39F
約還要再一年...司機等不了.....
05/19 17:41, 39F

05/19 17:44, , 40F
不過重點還是在如果JK不續約 控衛要抓誰?
05/19 17:44, 40F

05/19 17:45, , 41F
難道真的要讓JJB先發嗎@@
05/19 17:45, 41F

05/19 18:01, , 42F
Jet,然後補SG
05/19 18:01, 42F

05/19 18:13, , 43F
如果真要讓JT回去補 我不太樂觀說 又要再去適應 對一
05/19 18:13, 43F

05/19 18:13, , 44F
以得分靠手感的球員來說 重新適應定位不是很理想
05/19 18:13, 44F

05/19 18:14, , 45F
05/19 18:14, 45F

05/19 18:25, , 46F
毀滅者真的不行媽@.@
05/19 18:25, 46F

05/19 21:08, , 47F
Kidd打法是跟球隊打法配合 其實也沒退不退化..他能耐
05/19 21:08, 47F

05/19 21:09, , 48F
就是10分左右 顛峰如太陽隊時也是因為球隊需要他出手
05/19 21:09, 48F

05/19 23:13, , 49F
明年合約年蛋皮搞不好會爆氣 但再爆也不太想續約了
05/19 23:13, 49F
文章代碼(AID): #1A4YUngr (Mavericks)