[外電] Should Mavs try to trade for Shaquille O'Neal?
http://tinyurl.com/qajp5j
The Mavs might be able to get the best big man of this generation by sending
Erick Dampier and Jerry Stackhouse to the Suns.
That deal, assuming Phoenix would buy out Stack, would represent eight-figure
savings to Suns owner Robert Sarver. That could free up money to sign Amare
Stoudemire to a long-term extension, instead of trading their franchise
player and beginning a rebuilding project.
From the Mavs' perspective, they're replacing a mediocre big man with a
legend. What's not to like?
Well, the legend is no longer a dominant force. Shaq still puts up pretty
good numbers (17.8 ppg, 8.4 rpg last season), but he's a major defensive
liability. Replacing Damp with Shaq is a significant step in the wrong
direction as far as accomplishing the Mavs' mission of improving on the
defensive end.
You could argue that Shaq's low-post presence more than makes up for what the
Mavs would lose on the other end of the floor. But you can't rationally say
that 37-year-old Shaq, who has missed more than 10 games in six of the last
eight seasons, makes the Mavs legitimate contenders.
I'd love to see Shaq come to Dallas, just for the entertainment value. He's
one of the great characters in sports today, so it'd make my job easy and
enjoyable.
Mark Cuban enjoys the Shaq act, too, but he threw water on a brush fire of
Shaq-to-Dallas speculation this spring.
Cuban has made it clear that he's willing to lose a lot of money in a deal
that makes the Mavs much better. I'm not sure that getting Shaq, even as a
salary dump, falls in that category.
專欄作家寫的
又是小牛是否該交易來Oneal的議題
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 220.131.224.157
推
05/19 11:38, , 1F
05/19 11:38, 1F
推
05/19 11:41, , 2F
05/19 11:41, 2F
→
05/19 11:43, , 3F
05/19 11:43, 3F
推
05/19 11:46, , 4F
05/19 11:46, 4F
→
05/19 11:47, , 5F
05/19 11:47, 5F
→
05/19 11:47, , 6F
05/19 11:47, 6F
→
05/19 11:48, , 7F
05/19 11:48, 7F
→
05/19 11:48, , 8F
05/19 11:48, 8F
推
05/19 12:26, , 9F
05/19 12:26, 9F
推
05/19 12:33, , 10F
05/19 12:33, 10F
→
05/19 12:34, , 11F
05/19 12:34, 11F
推
05/19 12:39, , 12F
05/19 12:39, 12F
→
05/19 12:39, , 13F
05/19 12:39, 13F
→
05/19 12:40, , 14F
05/19 12:40, 14F
→
05/19 12:41, , 15F
05/19 12:41, 15F
→
05/19 12:42, , 16F
05/19 12:42, 16F
→
05/19 13:01, , 17F
05/19 13:01, 17F
→
05/19 13:02, , 18F
05/19 13:02, 18F
推
05/19 13:07, , 19F
05/19 13:07, 19F
推
05/19 13:12, , 20F
05/19 13:12, 20F
→
05/19 13:26, , 21F
05/19 13:26, 21F
→
05/19 13:29, , 22F
05/19 13:29, 22F
推
05/19 15:05, , 23F
05/19 15:05, 23F
→
05/19 15:08, , 24F
05/19 15:08, 24F
→
05/19 15:09, , 25F
05/19 15:09, 25F
→
05/19 15:11, , 26F
05/19 15:11, 26F
推
05/19 15:11, , 27F
05/19 15:11, 27F
推
05/19 15:13, , 28F
05/19 15:13, 28F
推
05/19 15:16, , 29F
05/19 15:16, 29F
推
05/19 15:18, , 30F
05/19 15:18, 30F
→
05/19 15:18, , 31F
05/19 15:18, 31F
推
05/19 15:36, , 32F
05/19 15:36, 32F
推
05/19 15:42, , 33F
05/19 15:42, 33F
→
05/19 15:55, , 34F
05/19 15:55, 34F
推
05/19 16:07, , 35F
05/19 16:07, 35F
→
05/19 16:25, , 36F
05/19 16:25, 36F
推
05/19 17:26, , 37F
05/19 17:26, 37F
推
05/19 17:40, , 38F
05/19 17:40, 38F
→
05/19 17:41, , 39F
05/19 17:41, 39F
推
05/19 17:44, , 40F
05/19 17:44, 40F
→
05/19 17:45, , 41F
05/19 17:45, 41F
→
05/19 18:01, , 42F
05/19 18:01, 42F
推
05/19 18:13, , 43F
05/19 18:13, 43F
→
05/19 18:13, , 44F
05/19 18:13, 44F
→
05/19 18:14, , 45F
05/19 18:14, 45F
推
05/19 18:25, , 46F
05/19 18:25, 46F
→
05/19 21:08, , 47F
05/19 21:08, 47F
→
05/19 21:09, , 48F
05/19 21:09, 48F
推
05/19 23:13, , 49F
05/19 23:13, 49F