[心得] 覺得Integrate柔焦粉餅好雷
31歲 酒槽敏感乾荒肌
上一塊是蘭蔻奇蹟水粉餅 沒用過開架粉餅
蘭蔻好用但好貴 所以想找便宜替代品 之前又是IE愛用者
下手了這塊討論熱烈又頗有好評的開架粉餅 結果覺得好雷啊!
浮粉 脫妝 妝感又不是很自然!
早上上完這塊 鼻頭和鼻翼旁立刻浮粉
遮瑕是比蘭蔻強 但妝感厚厚的很粉 明顯有上妝的樣子
到了下午 臉上已經變成東一塊 西一塊 脫妝了啊啊...
昨天和今天用都是如此!
題外話是我拿蘭蔻BO-01現場去比對色號 最相近是OC-00 最白的色號
我心中碎碎念超懷疑因為自己絕對不是白皙的女生
但想說粉餅顏色應該就是粉的顏色沒錯.....
結果完全太白,變面具!蘭蔻卻非常自然,真的很奇怪= =
(有人可以幫我解惑嗎?)
但我想除了色號不合,上面三個缺點還是存在...
總之,對這塊好失望啊啊啊(美妝的世界專櫃和開架還是有差?)
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.251.32.99
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/MakeUp/M.1487671861.A.CE0.html
推
02/21 18:15, , 1F
02/21 18:15, 1F
→
02/21 18:15, , 2F
02/21 18:15, 2F
→
02/21 18:15, , 3F
02/21 18:15, 3F
→
02/21 18:15, , 4F
02/21 18:15, 4F
→
02/21 18:15, , 5F
02/21 18:15, 5F
推
02/21 18:17, , 6F
02/21 18:17, 6F
推
02/21 18:17, , 7F
02/21 18:17, 7F
推
02/21 18:17, , 8F
02/21 18:17, 8F
請問d大使用蘭蔻和IE兩塊時,不會覺得差很多嗎!?
推
02/21 18:18, , 9F
02/21 18:18, 9F
我是淡妝派!追求不像有化妝的心機自然妝~
※ 編輯: crazyM (111.251.32.99), 02/21/2017 18:21:02
※ 編輯: crazyM (111.251.32.99), 02/21/2017 18:24:56
推
02/21 18:24, , 10F
02/21 18:24, 10F
→
02/21 18:24, , 11F
02/21 18:24, 11F
→
02/21 18:25, , 12F
02/21 18:25, 12F
推
02/21 18:35, , 13F
02/21 18:35, 13F
→
02/21 18:35, , 14F
02/21 18:35, 14F
→
02/21 18:35, , 15F
02/21 18:35, 15F
→
02/21 18:35, , 16F
02/21 18:35, 16F
推
02/21 18:37, , 17F
02/21 18:37, 17F
→
02/21 18:37, , 18F
02/21 18:37, 18F
推
02/21 18:38, , 19F
02/21 18:38, 19F
→
02/21 18:38, , 20F
02/21 18:38, 20F
推
02/21 18:40, , 21F
02/21 18:40, 21F
推
02/21 18:54, , 22F
02/21 18:54, 22F
→
02/21 18:54, , 23F
02/21 18:54, 23F
→
02/21 18:54, , 24F
02/21 18:54, 24F
推
02/21 19:02, , 25F
02/21 19:02, 25F
→
02/21 19:02, , 26F
02/21 19:02, 26F
推
02/21 19:15, , 27F
02/21 19:15, 27F
→
02/21 19:15, , 28F
02/21 19:15, 28F
→
02/21 19:15, , 29F
02/21 19:15, 29F
→
02/21 19:15, , 30F
02/21 19:15, 30F
→
02/21 19:15, , 31F
02/21 19:15, 31F
推
02/21 19:21, , 32F
02/21 19:21, 32F
推
02/21 19:23, , 33F
02/21 19:23, 33F
→
02/21 19:23, , 34F
02/21 19:23, 34F
推
02/21 19:36, , 35F
02/21 19:36, 35F
→
02/21 19:36, , 36F
02/21 19:36, 36F
→
02/21 19:36, , 37F
02/21 19:36, 37F
還有 114 則推文
推
02/22 09:59, , 152F
02/22 09:59, 152F
推
02/22 11:38, , 153F
02/22 11:38, 153F
→
02/22 11:38, , 154F
02/22 11:38, 154F
→
02/22 11:38, , 155F
02/22 11:38, 155F
推
02/22 11:55, , 156F
02/22 11:55, 156F
→
02/22 11:55, , 157F
02/22 11:55, 157F
→
02/22 11:55, , 158F
02/22 11:55, 158F
推
02/22 12:49, , 159F
02/22 12:49, 159F
推
02/22 13:02, , 160F
02/22 13:02, 160F
→
02/22 13:02, , 161F
02/22 13:02, 161F
推
02/22 13:44, , 162F
02/22 13:44, 162F
推
02/22 14:46, , 163F
02/22 14:46, 163F
推
02/22 15:17, , 164F
02/22 15:17, 164F
推
02/22 19:09, , 165F
02/22 19:09, 165F
→
02/22 19:09, , 166F
02/22 19:09, 166F
推
02/22 23:28, , 167F
02/22 23:28, 167F
推
02/23 17:03, , 168F
02/23 17:03, 168F
→
02/23 17:03, , 169F
02/23 17:03, 169F
推
02/23 18:53, , 170F
02/23 18:53, 170F
推
02/23 22:39, , 171F
02/23 22:39, 171F
→
02/23 22:40, , 172F
02/23 22:40, 172F
→
02/23 22:40, , 173F
02/23 22:40, 173F
→
02/23 22:40, , 174F
02/23 22:40, 174F
→
02/23 22:40, , 175F
02/23 22:40, 175F

推
02/24 00:19, , 176F
02/24 00:19, 176F
→
02/24 00:19, , 177F
02/24 00:19, 177F
推
02/24 14:51, , 178F
02/24 14:51, 178F
推
02/24 14:51, , 179F
02/24 14:51, 179F
推
02/25 19:18, , 180F
02/25 19:18, 180F
推
02/25 19:19, , 181F
02/25 19:19, 181F
推
02/25 19:19, , 182F
02/25 19:19, 182F
推
02/25 19:20, , 183F
02/25 19:20, 183F
推
02/25 19:21, , 184F
02/25 19:21, 184F
推
02/26 21:24, , 185F
02/26 21:24, 185F
→
02/26 21:24, , 186F
02/26 21:24, 186F
→
02/26 21:24, , 187F
02/26 21:24, 187F
→
02/26 21:24, , 188F
02/26 21:24, 188F
→
02/26 21:24, , 189F
02/26 21:24, 189F
推
02/27 22:53, , 190F
02/27 22:53, 190F
推
03/05 16:00, , 191F
03/05 16:00, 191F