[情報] ESPN選出MLB各隊近51年最破守位

看板MLB作者 (無無)時間3年前 (2021/04/27 11:32), 編輯推噓11(11推 0噓 7→)
留言18則, 14人參與, 3年前最新討論串1/1
ESPN選出MLB各隊近51年最破守位 Sore spots: The one position that most haunts all 30 MLB teams https://www.espn.com/mlb/insider/story/_/id/31296037/sore-spots-one-position-mos t-haunts-all-30-mlb-teams 註: (1)看內文hole score是用來衡量各守位破洞程度+持續時間，分數越高代表越破 (2)連兩年這守位高於平均的話則設為green 話說這樣看這52年來銀河躲真的沒破洞欸XD 1969-2020 以下按破洞程度排名 越前面代表越破 1. Chicago Cubs Position: Center field (hole score: 38) Last green: Never (0% green since 1969) 2. Pittsburgh Pirates Position: Right field (hole score: 35) Last green: 1991 (25% green since 1969) 3. Washington Nationals Position: Catcher (hole score: 33) Last green: 1984 (15% green since 1969) 4. San Diego Padres Position: Starting pitchers (hole score: 32) Last green: 1998 (17% green since 1969) 5. Colorado Rockies Position: Catcher (hole score: 24) Last green: Never (0% green since 1969) . 6. Miami Marlins Position: First base (hole score: 23) Last green: Never (0% green since 1969) 7. Kansas City Royals Position: Right field (hole score: 22) Last green: 2000 (2% green since 1969) 8. Philadelphia Phillies Position: Third base (hole score: 21) Last green: 2004 (46% green since 1969) 9. Houston Astros Position: Catcher (hole score: 21) Last green: 1971 (4% green since 1969) 10. Detroit Tigers Position: Relief pitchers (hole score: 18) Last green: 1990 (29% green since 1969) 11. Arizona Diamondbacks Position: Relief pitchers (hole score: 17) Last green: 2003 (13% green since 1969) 12. Tampa Bay Rays Position: Catcher (hole score: 17) Last green: 1999 (4% green since 1969) 13. San Francisco Giants Position: Center field (hole score: 15) Last green: 1991 (20% green since 1969) 14. Chicago White Sox Position: Center field (hole score: 14) Last green: 2005 (23% green since 1969) 15. New York Mets Position: Catcher (hole score: 14) Last green: 2003 (37% green since 1969) 16. Milwaukee Brewers Position: Shortstop (hole score: 13) Last green: 2009 (29% green since 1969) whether he pans out. 17. Texas Rangers Position: First base (hole score: 13) Last green: 2007 (60% green since 1969) 18. Seattle Mariners Position: 1B (hole score: 13) Last green: 2006 (16% green since 1969) 19. Cincinnati Reds Position: Center field (hole score: 11) Last green: 2005 (35% green since 1969) 20. Baltimore Orioles Position: Starting pitchers (hole score: 11) Last green: 1999 (35% green since 1969) 21. Atlanta Braves Position: Third base (hole score: 9) Last green: 2013 (42% green since 1969) 22. Boston Red Sox Position: Third base (hole score: 9) Last green: 2012 (60% green since 1969) 23. Minnesota Twins Position: Starting pitchers (hole score: 9) Last green: 2011 (54% green since 1969) 24. Los Angeles Angels Position: Left field (hole score: 7) Last green: 2014 (25% green since 1969) 25. Cleveland Indians Position: Center field (hole score: 7) Last green: 2009 (44% green since 1969) 26. Toronto Blue Jays Position: Third base (hole score: 6) Last green: 2017 (41% green since 1969) 27. St. Louis Cardinals Position: Starting pitchers (hole score: 5) Last green: 1979 (17% green since 1969) 28. Oakland Athletics Position: Second base (hole score: 4) Last green: 2011 (37% green since 1969) 29. New York Yankees Position: Shortstop (hole score: 3) Last green: 2018 (63% green since 1969) 30. Los Angeles Dodgers Position: Relief pitchers (hole score: 0) Last green: 2020 (54% green since 1969) -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.45.165.194 (臺灣) ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/MLB/M.1619494372.A.444.html
推
04/27 11:50, 3年前 , 1F
Never ==
04/27 11:50, 1F
推
04/27 12:13, 3年前 , 2F
洋基29...？
04/27 12:13, 2F
→
04/27 12:20, 3年前 , 3F
29怎麼了嗎
04/27 12:20, 3F
推
04/27 12:20, 3年前 , 4F
天使只有左外野是洞？投手呢？
04/27 12:20, 4F
推
04/27 12:28, 3年前 , 5F
天使以前投手有名的那麼多.....
04/27 12:28, 5F
推
04/27 12:42, 3年前 , 6F
我一直以為內野除了dj都很破
04/27 12:42, 6F
→
04/27 12:43, 3年前 , 7F
2樓不知道排名越後面洞越小嗎 還是覺得ss一直都是洞
04/27 12:43, 7F
推
04/27 12:43, 3年前 , 8F
運動家真猛 不像人家哪邊有洞就可以FA補
04/27 12:43, 8F
→
04/27 12:46, 3年前 , 9F
洋基基本上Jeter前 都沒有什麼穩定游擊吧 但一次就穩20年
04/27 12:46, 9F
→
04/27 12:57, 3年前 , 10F
Last green: Never
04/27 12:57, 10F
推
04/27 13:05, 3年前 , 11F
待會一定會有人來說Jeter都靠二三壘cover
04/27 13:05, 11F
推
04/27 13:10, 3年前 , 12F
沒差吧...Jeter光靠打擊就穩高於平均了
04/27 13:10, 12F
→
04/27 13:20, 3年前 , 13F
丁特本來就是以守備鳥爛用棒子cover聞名R
04/27 13:20, 13F
推
04/27 14:06, 3年前 , 14F
50年加總起來的數據不知道是能代表什麼
04/27 14:06, 14F
推
04/27 14:56, 3年前 , 15F
用破洞的角度來重新回想某些球隊的選秀與補強邏輯 還滿
04/27 14:56, 15F
→
04/27 14:57, 3年前 , 16F
滿有道理的
04/27 14:57, 16F
推
04/27 18:15, 3年前 , 17F
推
04/27 18:15, 17F
→
04/27 23:07, 3年前 , 18F
但是這是50年累積下來的數據 要怎麼回想邏輯
04/27 23:07, 18F
‣ 更多 zxc906383 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1WXuNaH4 (MLB)