[外電] 新版CBA的rumors

看板MLB作者 (我不是假髮 是假戳髮)時間7年前 (2016/11/01 14:50), 7年前編輯推噓7(7010)
留言17則, 8人參與, 最新討論串1/1
今天沒有比賽剛好看到這則外電 想說跟大家討論看看 來源: https://goo.gl/OYJfRj 本文翻譯自mlbtraderumors.com MLB’s collective bargaining agreement expires December 1, and both MLB commissioner Rob Manfred and MLBPA head Tony Clark have expressed optimism that two parties can avoid a work stoppage. While Manfred had previously said he hoped to have a new deal in place by the end of the postseason, though, Joel Sherman of the New York Post reports that he hears there is still work to be done, even on the day of what could be the clinching game of the World Series. 大聯盟的集體談判協議 (collective bargaining agreement, CBA) 將於今年12月1日到 期,勞資雙方接樂觀表示新版的CBA能夠順利完成。然而大聯盟主席Rob Manfred 曾經表 示,他希望在世界大賽結束時就能有一份新版的協議,而根據紐約郵報 (New York Post) 記者Joel Sherman的報導,新版的協議正在如火如荼的展開,即便到新的世界大賽 冠軍出來,仍還有可能無法完成。 It is possible, Sherman writes, that rules from the previous CBA could be “ rolled over for at least this offseason.” A rollover of the current rules could potentially keep this winter’s free agent market from stalling by allowing free agents to negotiate with teams without either party worrying about how a new agreement might affect them. Sherman表示當前CBA的規則可能至少延續到今年的休賽期。延用當前CBA的規則可以使今 年冬天的自由市場可以順利進行, 使自由球員與球團能夠安心的洽談簽約。 Sherman notes that the two sides have batted around a number of possible changes to the qualifying offer system. One possibility is that MLB could agree to stop taking draft picks from teams that sign free agents who have rejected qualifying offers. (As we’ve seen in the cases of Kyle Lohse, Stephen Drew, Ian Desmond and others in recent years, these draft pick losses reduce free agents’ value, which is why the MLBPA would want to change the current rules.) Sherman 另外指出勞資雙方可能針對合格報價系統(qualifying offer system)的內容進 行攻防。其中一種可能是大聯盟將會取消選秀補償權 (例如: Kyle Lohse, Stephen Drew, Ian Desmond等之前的狀況,球員工會認為選秀補償權將會影響自由球員的價值。) Sherman writes that, under the changes being considered, teams losing good free agents would still receive compensation. It remains to be seen what form that compensation would take, although it’s worth noting that, under the previous system, a team that offered a Type B free agent arbitration before his departure received a draft pick, without the signing team having to give up anything. Perhaps MLB and the MLBPA will consider reinstituting a similar system for a certain class of free agents. Sherman寫道,在爭議還未落幕前,那些損失優良自由球員的球隊還是可以獲得補償選秀 ,只是要以何種形式進行補償就有待討論了,值得注意的是,在更之前的協議中,若原球 團在Type B球員離去前提出薪資仲裁將會獲得一個選秀權,而簽約的球團並不需要放棄任 何選秀權。或許大聯盟官方跟球員工會將會朝著恢復類似的機制以制定新版的CBA。 ----------------------- 心得感想: 2011年版本的CBA將在今年到期 不過今年的FA市場應該還是照2011年版的進行 這次提出的問題則是球員這方認為選秀補償權將會影響到球員的權力 像是例子所提到的Kyle Loshe、印象中還有Adam LaRoche等 皆因為第一輪的選秀補償權 而拖到很晚才簽約 價值自然大減 不過對於球團來說補償權也是必須的 就看今年勞資雙方怎麼談了 PS.這篇是小弟第一篇的外電翻譯,請大家多多批評與指教 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 110.28.72.5 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/MLB/M.1477983004.A.03B.html

11/01 14:51, , 1F
不是專員是聖教主Manfred
11/01 14:51, 1F

11/01 15:43, , 2F
怎麼感覺新的勞資協議又走回頭路... A,B,C的規則都
11/01 15:43, 2F

11/01 15:43, , 3F
廢掉多久了 又要玩這一套
11/01 15:43, 3F

11/01 16:11, , 4F
commissioner在職業運動通常翻成主席或總裁吧
11/01 16:11, 4F
感謝指正

11/01 16:52, , 5F
應該不是恢復type A B C,而是提QO的球隊在失去該自由球員
11/01 16:52, 5F

11/01 16:52, , 6F
時一樣可以獲得補償選秀權,但簽走該自由球員的球隊並不會
11/01 16:52, 6F

11/01 16:52, , 7F
失去自己的選秀權,以免該自由球員的市場價值受到損失
11/01 16:52, 7F

11/01 17:22, , 8F
這樣才不合理好嗎?如果又是round1s的地方,又要來那種
11/01 17:22, 8F

11/01 17:22, , 9F
百勝球隊在前五十順位選的比百敗球隊還多的(很可能多很
11/01 17:22, 9F

11/01 17:22, , 10F
多)的戲碼了嗎?
11/01 17:22, 10F

11/01 18:37, , 11F
不喜歡新版這種莫名多出幾支籤的想法
11/01 18:37, 11F

11/01 18:39, , 12F
現行的方案會讓那些沒有簽QO球員的中前段,因為某幾隊
11/01 18:39, 12F

11/01 18:42, , 13F
的簽約案使得他們的選秀順位無痛往前進,而原球隊只拿
11/01 18:42, 13F

11/01 18:42, , 14F
到一輪末的籤如果“被沒收的順位”直接補償給原球隊,感
11/01 18:42, 14F

11/01 18:42, , 15F
覺合理一些
11/01 18:42, 15F

11/01 20:49, , 16F
哪裡必須了...
11/01 20:49, 16F
※ 編輯: winduanckc (115.43.63.183), 11/01/2016 23:22:05 ※ 編輯: winduanckc (115.43.63.183), 11/01/2016 23:40:23

11/02 07:51, , 17F
擴大第一輪保護隊數就好,今年沒打好的可以能下去撿便宜
11/02 07:51, 17F
文章代碼(AID): #1O63iS0x (MLB)