[外電] Qualifying Offer Value Set At $15.8MM

看板MLB作者時間10年前 (2015/10/10 23:25), 10年前編輯推噓42(42推 0噓 37→)
留言79則, 35人參與, 最新討論串1/1
The 2015-16 free agent season’s qualifying offer value has been set at $15.8MM, according to a tweet from Eric Fisher of the Sports Business Journal. That represents an increase, of course, but the rise isn’t nearly as great as it has been in the past. The QO system used a $13.3MM number in its first year, which increased to $14.1MM and then to $15.3MM last fall. The qualifying offer value is determined by averaging the 125 contracts leaguewide that have the highest average annual values. Here’s a quick refresher on how the qualifying offer system works: Teams can offer their departing free agents a one-year deal, at the established price tag, within five days of the conclusion of the World Series. Over the next seven days, players who receive the offer are allowed to talk with other teams and decide whether to take the single-season pact. If they reject it, then draft implications attach: their former team stands to gain a compensation pick in the following year’s draft, while a new signing team must give up their highest non-protected draft choice. There are plenty of other elements of the system, of course, and you can check out this old-but-good overview for more. For an understanding of why the qualifying offer matters so much, read this great explanation of why “ avoiding the qualifying offer” is so important for a free agent’s value. Players traded in mid-season are not eligible to receive a qualifying offer. So, for example, the Royals can make a qualifying offer to Alex Gordon but cannot extend one to Johnny Cueto or Ben Zobrist. And remember: we still have yet to see a player accept a qualifying offer. While several QO-declining players have seemingly experienced market impacts after being saddled with draft compensation, the opportunity to test the open market in search of a multi-year pact has thus far proved compelling. http://goo.gl/PEVSSU 今年的QO是15.8M 原本預估約16M QO實施後還沒有選手接受過 歷年QO 2012 13.3M 2013 14.1M 2014 15.3M -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 61.228.171.204 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/MLB/M.1444490743.A.1B5.html ※ 編輯: Zuleta (61.228.171.204), 10/10/2015 23:27:01
推
10/10 23:29, , 1F
如果接受了QO簽1年，來年還可以再提QO?
10/10 23:29, 1F
推
10/10 23:29, , 2F
yes
10/10 23:29, 2F
推
10/10 23:32, , 3F
複數年約才有保障（中職除外）
10/10 23:32, 3F
推
10/10 23:33, , 4F
好奇一問 今鶯會願意出1580萬的QO給陳? 不是說省錢
10/10 23:33, 4F
推
10/10 23:33, , 5F
陳怎麼可能接受...可以簽個60M的誰要15.8M
10/10 23:33, 5F
→
10/10 23:34, , 6F
當然會，因為陳應該不會簽，選秀權不要白不要。
10/10 23:34, 6F
推
10/10 23:34, , 7F
為何會不願意 有選秀權耶
10/10 23:34, 7F
→
10/10 23:34, , 8F
又不會接受 沒簽就沒花錢啊
10/10 23:34, 8F
推
10/10 23:34, , 9F
接受就是簽一年短約風險小
10/10 23:34, 9F
※ 編輯: Zuleta (61.228.171.204), 10/10/2015 23:35:47
→
10/10 23:36, , 10F
金鶯一定會提QO 陳不接受還可以拿選秀權
10/10 23:36, 10F
推
10/10 23:40, , 11F
去年才8M大漲價
10/10 23:40, 11F
推
10/10 23:40, , 12F
所以如果chen接受了 金鶯就一定得付1580萬就對了
10/10 23:40, 12F
※ 編輯: Zuleta (61.228.171.204), 10/10/2015 23:42:29
推
10/10 23:43, , 13F
15.8感覺接近甜蜜點了,應該會有第一個了吧
10/10 23:43, 13F
推
10/10 23:43, , 14F
陳接受了金鳥就賺了~
10/10 23:43, 14F
推
10/10 23:45, , 15F
我比較好奇今年金鶯會拿幾個選秀權
10/10 23:45, 15F
推
10/10 23:46, , 16F
會提QO但陳不會接受的,簽長約才有保障
10/10 23:46, 16F
推
10/10 23:47, , 17F
不太可能接受，平白放棄肥約的機會
10/10 23:47, 17F
推
10/10 23:49, , 18F
如果金鶯提了 代表他們認可陳有一年領1580萬的實力?
10/10 23:49, 18F
推
10/10 23:52, , 19F
不提連選秀權都拿不到跟認可沒什麼關係
10/10 23:52, 19F
推
10/11 00:08, , 20F
去年Cuddyer寧可簽2y/21M 也不願1y/15.3M 在山上
10/11 00:08, 20F
→
10/11 00:09, , 21F
就知道QO有多麼廉價了
10/11 00:09, 21F
→
10/11 00:09, , 22F
提QO跟認不認可有時候是兩回事
10/11 00:09, 22F
推
10/11 00:12, , 23F
QO就只是個程序 不提沒選秀權拿
10/11 00:12, 23F
→
10/11 00:12, , 24F
打的爛的留不留都沒差 打得好的不出更多錢絕對留不住
10/11 00:12, 24F
推
10/11 00:16, , 25F
明年打的好打不好都不知道能簽長約誰會想只簽1年
10/11 00:16, 25F
→
10/11 00:16, , 26F
有心的話早就綁個雙方滿意的約了,選手佛心的話會給老東
10/11 00:16, 26F
→
10/11 00:17, , 27F
家破盤價,弄到QO根本就是不想簽2年以上了
10/11 00:17, 27F
推
10/11 00:25, , 28F
陳也應該考慮明年陣中主將會留不住...陣容可能更爛...
10/11 00:25, 28F
→
10/11 00:26, , 29F
還是趕快逃離金鶯吧...
10/11 00:26, 29F
推
10/11 00:26, , 30F
lovemelissa 一年拿15.8M跟平均一年拿15.8M是不同概念
10/11 00:26, 30F
推
10/11 00:28, , 31F
逃離金鶯這種搞笑推文還是去棒球版吧
10/11 00:28, 31F
推
10/11 00:47, , 32F
我懂了 謝謝以上推文指教
10/11 00:47, 32F
推
10/11 01:20, , 33F
陳怎麼可能接受...可以簽個60M的誰要15.8M
10/11 01:20, 33F
→
10/11 01:22, , 34F
隔壁克里夫蘭騎士隊有個叫湯普森的
10/11 01:22, 34F
推
10/11 01:23, , 35F
可是瑞凡逃離金鶯就沒有馬車多的神守備了
10/11 01:23, 35F
→
10/11 01:23, , 36F
想要一口氣簽長約拿八十萬，哪看得上QO,就拒絕了
10/11 01:23, 36F
→
10/11 01:26, , 37F
那個湯普森，全聯盟只有兩隊給得起80M給他，他也敢拒
10/11 01:26, 37F
→
10/11 01:26, , 38F
絕QO
10/11 01:26, 38F
→
10/11 01:28, , 39F
同樣來觀Chen，全聯盟給得起60M給他的還不少隊，見鬼
10/11 01:28, 39F
→
10/11 01:28, , 40F
了才會接受QO
10/11 01:28, 40F
推
10/11 02:07, , 41F
NBA跟MLB的QO差這麼多也在比。
10/11 02:07, 41F
→
10/11 02:23, , 42F
...NBA的QO只有該名一輪新秀第四年合約的125%而已
10/11 02:23, 42F
推
10/11 02:24, , 43F
對金鶯來說要不要對Matt Wieters提QO是比較難的問題
10/11 02:24, 43F
推
10/11 02:26, , 44F
這兩年因傷出賽數大幅下降 他如果選一年約拼一下也不奇怪
10/11 02:26, 44F
推
10/11 02:37, , 45F
O's誰都可以不要,Chris Davis是一定要留的
10/11 02:37, 45F
推
10/11 03:04, , 46F
QO基本上只是保護選秀權的方式，提QO還是可以簽長約
10/11 03:04, 46F
→
10/11 03:05, , 47F
另外，的確金鶯今年的難題是要不要對Wieters提QO
10/11 03:05, 47F
→
10/11 03:06, , 48F
CD,Chen鐵定是會提QO的
10/11 03:06, 48F
推
10/11 03:08, , 49F
然後O'Day應該會續約。我是不看好有大動作
10/11 03:08, 49F
→
10/11 03:09, , 50F
D'Angelo基本上安於現狀，八成不想提高payroll
10/11 03:09, 50F
→
10/11 03:09, , 51F
另外金鶯可能會追Doug Fister
10/11 03:09, 51F
推
10/11 06:49, , 52F
去年QQ8m，你的去年是那一年？
10/11 06:49, 52F
推
10/11 07:06, , 53F
今年季中不是被調整下放AAA嗎？應該不會接受QO
10/11 07:06, 53F
推
10/11 07:54, , 54F
記得沒錯還不是下放AAA 是去A
10/11 07:54, 54F
→
10/11 08:45, , 55F
陳偉殷很高機會可以簽到52M/4Y以上 不管怎樣也不會接受QO
10/11 08:45, 55F
→
10/11 08:46, , 56F
跟有沒有下放一點關係也沒有
10/11 08:46, 56F
→
10/11 08:47, , 57F
Chris Davis有可能130M/5Y以上 金鶯最貴球員AJ明年16M
10/11 08:47, 57F
→
10/11 08:47, , 58F
感覺要留很拼阿
10/11 08:47, 58F
→
10/11 08:48, , 59F
Machado也要開始仲裁了 以他的成績和年紀不快綁進到FA
10/11 08:48, 59F
→
10/11 08:49, , 60F
八年起跳只是基本而已 金鶯這季末老闆發不發銀彈阿
10/11 08:49, 60F
推
10/11 08:54, , 61F
Machado的經紀人一向反對自己的客戶提前跟母隊簽長約啊
10/11 08:54, 61F
→
10/11 08:55, , 62F
Weaver當年跟天使續長約時Boras氣到不只自己連代表也不派去
10/11 08:55, 62F
→
10/11 08:57, , 63F
要說服Boras讓Machado簽下去恐怕得端出一筆非常非常可觀的
10/11 08:57, 63F
→
10/11 08:57, , 64F
數字 依照金鶯老闆的吝嗇程度...
10/11 08:57, 64F
推
10/11 08:58, , 65F
比起WY Chen,要取代一個46HR的真的找不到..這不是2001年
10/11 08:58, 65F
→
10/11 08:58, , 66F
好幾年前老美那邊有不少金鶯迷高興國民轉播合約在MASN手上
10/11 08:58, 66F
→
10/11 08:59, , 67F
覺得靠這筆收益能好好幫助球隊補強 結果老闆把錢都放口袋裡
10/11 08:59, 67F
推
10/11 09:54, , 68F
Boras哪有反對提前簽約? Carlos Gonzalez不就提前綁了?
10/11 09:54, 68F
→
10/11 09:55, , 69F
基本上Boras就只是忠實執行客戶的意願 只是剛好他大牌
10/11 09:55, 69F
→
10/11 09:56, , 70F
客戶多 當然想去FA試身價的情況就多而已
10/11 09:56, 70F
推
10/11 11:01, , 71F
小陳逃離金鳥吧 根本不尊重 隨便一隊4y50M
10/11 11:01, 71F
→
10/11 13:00, , 72F
所以落磯不就拿出非常非常可觀的數字了嗎? 別只看第一句啦
10/11 13:00, 72F
推
10/11 14:25, , 73F
Weaver當年續長約是連數字都很佛 而且他說錢夠了就是夠了
10/11 14:25, 73F
→
10/11 14:25, , 74F
MLB還是有人不完全看錢的
10/11 14:25, 74F
推
10/11 18:35, , 75F
80M/7y對個MVP候選人來說哪裡可觀了?
10/11 18:35, 75F
推
10/11 18:54, , 76F
前兩年Machado 有抱怨球隊不願意提早簽約啊！
10/11 18:54, 76F
推
10/11 19:42, , 77F
CarGo那張約破了當時僅滿兩年年資就簽下的延長約總額紀錄
10/11 19:42, 77F
→
10/11 19:42, , 78F
這樣算不算可觀? 見仁見智
10/11 19:42, 78F
→
10/13 16:01, , 79F
都還沒開始談哪來什麼尊不尊重 某樓...
10/13 16:01, 79F
‣ 更多 Zuleta 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1M6Itt6r (MLB)