Re: [討論] 天才小史不天才 怪力男不怪力了?
這種現象有時候會出現的
選秀狀元上大聯盟之後,不一定會打得很好
小史其實還算OK了,但是他續航力真的還是明顯不夠
相反的,有些選手一開始在選秀中並不是最起眼的
但是上了大聯盟卻越打越好
Harper跟Trout上大聯盟之前,Harper的評價比Trout還高
但是Trout上了大聯盟之後打得卻比Harper還要好
甚至很快就達成百轟百盜
Harper或許是太早被拉上來以及壓力的關係
導致他沒有打出超水準的表現
Harper的盜壘、全壘打、打擊率,都輸給Trout
不過Harper比Trout小一歲,未來有沒有可能像Trout一樣有超好的表現
(單季30轟、40盜、三成打擊率),可以值得觀察
小史未來只需要保持健康,單季19勝還是會有機會的
目前看來應該很難跟Kershaw一樣擁有3座賽楊獎
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 118.233.157.87
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/MLB/M.1430976162.A.0C5.html
推
05/07 13:27, , 1F
05/07 13:27, 1F
→
05/07 13:28, , 2F
05/07 13:28, 2F
→
05/07 13:29, , 3F
05/07 13:29, 3F
→
05/07 13:32, , 4F
05/07 13:32, 4F
→
05/07 13:32, , 5F
05/07 13:32, 5F
→
05/07 13:33, , 6F
05/07 13:33, 6F
→
05/07 13:34, , 7F
05/07 13:34, 7F
→
05/07 13:35, , 8F
05/07 13:35, 8F
→
05/07 13:36, , 9F
05/07 13:36, 9F
另外小史的部分,在2010年上來大聯盟的時候也進了DL
因為這因素,所以小史在2012年到了季末就被迫提前關機(季後賽也不能投)
但是小史現在...也有點受傷
※ 編輯: Lumia920 (118.233.157.87), 05/07/2015 13:39:56
→
05/07 13:44, , 10F
05/07 13:44, 10F
→
05/07 13:45, , 11F
05/07 13:45, 11F
→
05/07 13:45, , 12F
05/07 13:45, 12F
推
05/07 13:47, , 13F
05/07 13:47, 13F
推
05/07 13:57, , 14F
05/07 13:57, 14F
推
05/07 13:59, , 15F
05/07 13:59, 15F
→
05/07 13:59, , 16F
05/07 13:59, 16F
推
05/07 14:02, , 17F
05/07 14:02, 17F
推
05/07 14:14, , 18F
05/07 14:14, 18F
推
05/07 14:16, , 19F
05/07 14:16, 19F
推
05/07 14:38, , 20F
05/07 14:38, 20F
→
05/07 14:38, , 21F
05/07 14:38, 21F
推
05/07 14:40, , 22F
05/07 14:40, 22F
推
05/07 14:49, , 23F
05/07 14:49, 23F
推
05/07 14:53, , 24F
05/07 14:53, 24F
→
05/07 14:56, , 25F
05/07 14:56, 25F
→
05/07 15:03, , 26F
05/07 15:03, 26F
→
05/07 15:06, , 27F
05/07 15:06, 27F
推
05/07 15:23, , 28F
05/07 15:23, 28F
推
05/07 15:26, , 29F
05/07 15:26, 29F
推
05/07 15:27, , 30F
05/07 15:27, 30F
推
05/07 16:27, , 31F
05/07 16:27, 31F
推
05/07 16:31, , 32F
05/07 16:31, 32F
→
05/07 16:31, , 33F
05/07 16:31, 33F
推
05/07 16:32, , 34F
05/07 16:32, 34F
推
05/07 16:33, , 35F
05/07 16:33, 35F
推
05/07 16:45, , 36F
05/07 16:45, 36F
→
05/07 17:39, , 37F
05/07 17:39, 37F
→
05/07 17:39, , 38F
05/07 17:39, 38F
還有 28 則推文
推
05/08 04:01, , 67F
05/08 04:01, 67F
→
05/08 04:01, , 68F
05/08 04:01, 68F
推
05/08 07:04, , 69F
05/08 07:04, 69F
→
05/08 07:04, , 70F
05/08 07:04, 70F
→
05/08 07:05, , 71F
05/08 07:05, 71F
推
05/08 07:06, , 72F
05/08 07:06, 72F
→
05/08 09:16, , 73F
05/08 09:16, 73F
推
05/08 09:19, , 74F
05/08 09:19, 74F
推
05/08 09:55, , 75F
05/08 09:55, 75F
推
05/08 09:59, , 76F
05/08 09:59, 76F
推
05/08 10:18, , 77F
05/08 10:18, 77F
推
05/08 10:33, , 78F
05/08 10:33, 78F
推
05/08 11:28, , 79F
05/08 11:28, 79F
推
05/08 11:50, , 80F
05/08 11:50, 80F
→
05/08 12:19, , 81F
05/08 12:19, 81F
→
05/08 13:07, , 82F
05/08 13:07, 82F
推
05/08 14:52, , 83F
05/08 14:52, 83F
推
05/08 14:57, , 84F
05/08 14:57, 84F
→
05/08 14:58, , 85F
05/08 14:58, 85F
推
05/08 15:04, , 86F
05/08 15:04, 86F
推
05/08 15:27, , 87F
05/08 15:27, 87F
→
05/08 15:27, , 88F
05/08 15:27, 88F
推
05/08 17:22, , 89F
05/08 17:22, 89F
→
05/08 17:23, , 90F
05/08 17:23, 90F
推
05/08 20:59, , 91F
05/08 20:59, 91F
→
05/09 00:29, , 92F
05/09 00:29, 92F
→
05/09 00:31, , 93F
05/09 00:31, 93F
→
05/09 00:40, , 94F
05/09 00:40, 94F
推
05/09 01:26, , 95F
05/09 01:26, 95F
推
05/09 02:01, , 96F
05/09 02:01, 96F
→
05/09 02:17, , 97F
05/09 02:17, 97F
推
05/09 09:15, , 98F
05/09 09:15, 98F
推
05/09 10:13, , 99F
05/09 10:13, 99F
推
05/09 14:29, , 100F
05/09 14:29, 100F
推
05/09 20:44, , 101F
05/09 20:44, 101F
→
05/09 21:27, , 102F
05/09 21:27, 102F
噓
05/10 15:04, , 103F
05/10 15:04, 103F
→
05/13 12:13, , 104F
05/13 12:13, 104F
推
09/18 04:16, , 105F
09/18 04:16, 105F
→
12/04 22:20, , 106F
12/04 22:20, 106F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 3 篇):
討論
-10
60