[情報] A-Rod怒告MLB和工會

看板MLB作者時間12年前 (2014/01/14 13:24), 編輯推噓46(46推 0噓 34→)
留言80則, 50人參與, 最新討論串1/1
http://tinyurl.com/mtx5nar In the suit, Rodriguez alleged the Players Association “completely abdicated its responsibility to Mr. Rodriguez to protect his rights under the agreements between MLB and MLBPA.” He also contended independent arbitrator Fredric Horowitz, who reduced A-Rod’s suspension from 211 games, “exhibited a manifest disregard for the law” and “acted with evident partiality.” A-Rod指控工會"沒有負起責任保護好A-Rod的權利" 仲裁員Fredric Horowitz"無視法律" "偏袒" The lawsuit details several complaints in which Team A-Rod alleges the Players Association, long viewed as one of the most effective and powerful unions in the United States, declined to intervene on Rodriguez’s behalf. Among them (in addition to Weiner’s interview) are the failure to stop MLB’ s civil lawsuit against Anthony Bosch, which led to Bosch cooperating with MLB; a refusal to let A-Rod select his own representative (instead of the PA’ s general counsel David Prouty) to the three-person arbitration panel; and a lack of effort to halt media leaks about Rodriguez’s case. 告工會 沒阻止MLB和Bosch合作 拒絕讓A-Rod挑選他自己的人加入三人仲裁小組 沒阻止媒體洩密 As for Horowitz, Team A-Rod alleged the arbitrator, a baseball fan, issued a ruling favorable to MLB because he didn’t want to get fired like his predecessor, Shyam Das, did after acquitting Ryan Braun. The Players Association also can fire an arbitrator, although it has never done so. The suit purported MLB had offered Rodriguez a 162-game suspension last August if he had agreed not to appeal, and Horowitz arrived at that same number in an effort to appease MLB. 告仲裁員Horowitz 怕像Shyam Das (Ryan Braun案仲裁員)一樣被火 所以作出禁賽的判決討好MLB --- 內文有77頁完整控告檔 有興趣可以下載來看看 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 123.194.205.48 ※ 編輯: abc12812 來自: 123.194.205.48 (01/14 13:25)
推
01/14 13:27, , 1F
連PA也跟著告啊...
01/14 13:27, 1F
→
01/14 13:35, , 2F
沒人挺他，只剩花錢買來的律師替他嘴了
01/14 13:35, 2F
推
01/14 13:35, , 3F
悲哀！！！
01/14 13:35, 3F
推
01/14 13:39, , 4F
真的很悲哀~
01/14 13:39, 4F
推
01/14 13:44, , 5F
阿肉表示震怒
01/14 13:44, 5F
推
01/14 13:48, , 6F
一定要上訴的啊 這樣薪水就可以繼續領 律師費小錢啦
01/14 13:48, 6F
→
01/14 13:49, , 7F
官司是靠數人頭定輸贏嗎？
01/14 13:49, 7F
推
01/14 13:49, , 8F
告工會 不會臭掉嗎
01/14 13:49, 8F
推
01/14 13:53, , 9F
77頁......
01/14 13:53, 9F
推
01/14 14:03, , 10F
看來下了玉石俱焚的決心...
01/14 14:03, 10F
推
01/14 14:04, , 11F
Shyam Das感覺有點無辜...?
01/14 14:04, 11F
→
01/14 14:06, , 12F
工會也沒幫他, 沒什麼好臭的
01/14 14:06, 12F
推
01/14 14:09, , 13F
現在就看那些證據 到底要不要拿出來.今年或許很會漫長
01/14 14:09, 13F
推
01/14 14:11, , 14F
上訴期間他能繼續打球嗎?
01/14 14:11, 14F
推
01/14 14:13, , 15F
上訴期間 禁賽判罰會被禁止？ 若是 當然告到底 金平.alex
01/14 14:13, 15F
推
01/14 14:14, , 16F
當然能繼續打球 不然是告辛酸的歐
01/14 14:14, 16F
推
01/14 14:14, , 17F
人緣差連帶影響別人對A Rod不公平 MLB官方真的超醜陋的
01/14 14:14, 17F
推
01/14 14:17, , 18F
要聲請假處分了嗎
01/14 14:17, 18F
推
01/14 14:19, , 19F
戰到底!
01/14 14:19, 19F
推
01/14 14:21, , 20F
他自己都說今年想打球了 不可能不上訴 也不可能不去
01/14 14:21, 20F
→
01/14 14:22, , 21F
申請限制令來讓禁賽暫緩執行 仲裁庭的錢都花了 聯邦
01/14 14:22, 21F
→
01/14 14:23, , 22F
法院的費用應該早就準備好了吧 在60M以後 他應該就
01/14 14:23, 22F
→
01/14 14:25, , 23F
義無反顧了 不能做更不利的判決 最多就是162場
01/14 14:25, 23F
→
01/14 14:25, , 24F
沒理由不繼續走下去
01/14 14:25, 24F
推
01/14 14:57, , 25F
逼人上絕路，地圖炮開了
01/14 14:57, 25F
推
01/14 14:59, , 26F
好好奇他律師費花了多少了
01/14 14:59, 26F
推
01/14 15:01, , 27F
77頁比碩士論文還長…
01/14 15:01, 27F
推
01/14 15:06, , 28F
對他來說花多少錢應該算是其次
01/14 15:06, 28F
→
01/14 15:08, , 29F
擴大戰線
01/14 15:08, 29F
→
01/14 15:18, , 30F
支持A-ROD繼續領錢打比賽
01/14 15:18, 30F
推
01/14 15:28, , 31F
還有戲看嗎 orz
01/14 15:28, 31F
推
01/14 15:38, , 32F
公會都不挺了?做人真失敗
01/14 15:38, 32F
推
01/14 15:59, , 33F
乖乖禁賽吧你
01/14 15:59, 33F
推
01/14 16:09, , 34F
公會不挺是因為看過證據的關係,與A-ROD做人失敗無關
01/14 16:09, 34F
推
01/14 16:17, , 35F
看來工會不挺他的傳言是真的了
01/14 16:17, 35F
推
01/14 16:54, , 36F
MLB官方想要殺雞儆猴，沒想到殺到一隻大老鷹
01/14 16:54, 36F
→
01/14 16:55, , 37F
若有這種神藥驗不出來，一定還有一票人在吃
01/14 16:55, 37F
→
01/14 16:56, , 38F
全部爆出來MLB整體會很慘。想要河蟹掉拿A-Rod祭旗嚇嚇大家
01/14 16:56, 38F
→
01/14 16:56, , 39F
樓上你想表達什麼?
01/14 16:56, 39F
→
01/14 16:58, , 40F
工會不挺他自然是知道還有一票人沒爆出來，同意教主拿ARod
01/14 16:58, 40F
推
01/14 16:59, , 41F
有這種只在比賽期間作用 賽後馬上代謝驗不出來的藥會只有
01/14 16:59, 41F
→
01/14 16:59, , 42F
13個人用嗎
01/14 16:59, 42F
→
01/14 16:59, , 43F
祭旗。要爆就全部爆，別等到一些人要退休後才開始說他也有吃
01/14 16:59, 43F
→
01/14 17:00, , 44F
so? 一碼歸一碼好嗎? 有其他Bosch的客戶打藥沒被禁賽?
01/14 17:00, 44F
→
01/14 17:02, , 45F
這次是罰Biogenesis案，你以為故意弄A-Rod嗎
01/14 17:02, 45F
→
01/14 17:03, , 46F
工會當初有建議A-Rod認罪協商 如果那時認罪只會被罰50場
01/14 17:03, 46F
→
01/14 17:03, , 47F
A-Rod不認又搞些有的沒的 現在GG了要怪誰?
01/14 17:03, 47F
→
01/14 17:05, , 48F
請問認罪只禁50場的說法哪來的？
01/14 17:05, 48F
推
01/14 17:08, , 49F
這次的事件不就明擺著是要殺機儆猴嗎？
01/14 17:08, 49F
→
01/14 17:09, , 50F
雞
01/14 17:09, 50F
→
01/14 17:11, , 51F
自己去看Buster Olney的報導吧
01/14 17:11, 51F
→
01/14 17:12, , 52F
話說回來 這事件藥檢有陽性的就有Colon/Melky/Braun
01/14 17:12, 52F
→
01/14 17:13, , 53F
命中率算是蠻高的 這種藥要叫神藥還差得遠了
01/14 17:13, 53F
→
01/14 17:13, , 54F
BALCO事件的藥才是最難檢驗的
01/14 17:13, 54F
→
01/14 17:15, , 55F
Jeff Passan說A-Rod還有吃DHEA
01/14 17:15, 55F
推
01/14 17:18, , 56F
Manny Ramirez藥檢也陽性 and twice
01/14 17:18, 56F
→
01/14 17:19, , 57F
另一個Bosch客戶
01/14 17:19, 57F
推
01/14 17:19, , 58F
那A-ROD是陰性還陽性? 總不會大家都陽性就他陰性吧....
01/14 17:19, 58F
推
01/14 17:21, , 59F
Cruz或Peralta都陰性了 就算A-Rod是陰性也不奇怪啊
01/14 17:21, 59F
→
01/14 17:21, , 60F
BALCO的那些參與者 包括Bonds, Sheffield, Santiago
01/14 17:21, 60F
→
01/14 17:22, , 61F
都完全沒被檢查出來
01/14 17:22, 61F
→
01/14 17:22, , 62F
啊對 BALCO案還有Giambi
01/14 17:22, 62F
推
01/14 17:26, , 63F
不過 這也可能跟這10年間檢驗技術進步有關啦ww
01/14 17:26, 63F
→
01/14 17:34, , 64F
話說讓自己的人進入仲裁小組是正常的嗎?
01/14 17:34, 64F
推
01/14 17:59, , 65F
地圖砲...
01/14 17:59, 65F
推
01/14 18:26, , 66F
從當初的一百多人名單只打A-Rod一個開始，這些人應該早就
01/14 18:26, 66F
→
01/14 18:27, , 67F
寫好劇本了
01/14 18:27, 67F
推
01/14 19:39, , 68F
把雞跟猴全都抖出來才有趣
01/14 19:39, 68F
推
01/14 20:01, , 69F
結果一堆球迷也超配合這才有趣XD
01/14 20:01, 69F
推
01/14 20:16, , 70F
合理懷疑工會棄保A-ROD保其他人
01/14 20:16, 70F
推
01/14 20:21, , 71F
地圖砲+七傷拳...
01/14 20:21, 71F
推
01/14 20:25, , 72F
ARod人生 好看 ~原堅強演員陣容將將加入“洋基”~
01/14 20:25, 72F
推
01/14 21:43, , 73F
不管啦A-rod is god
01/14 21:43, 73F
推
01/14 22:09, , 74F
Shyam Das一點都不倒楣 Braun的案子他莫名其妙作出程序不合無
01/14 22:09, 74F
→
01/14 22:10, , 75F
罪的判決 當時就一片譁然 後來被解任也是必然的...
01/14 22:10, 75F
推
01/14 22:24, , 76F
A-Rod 的忠實 fans 表示:
01/14 22:24, 76F
推
01/14 23:10, , 77F
禁藥世代 人人皆有罪
01/14 23:10, 77F
推
01/14 23:44, , 78F
MO應負沒阻止他人用禁藥的道義責任
01/14 23:44, 78F
推
01/15 03:19, , 79F
不排除解散
01/15 03:19, 79F
→
01/15 04:38, , 80F
支持把所有吃藥的都公布 殺雞儆猴作法難看
01/15 04:38, 80F
‣ 更多 abc12812 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1IrCe0B7 (MLB)