[情報] MLB votes to eliminate home-plate coll
MLB votes to eliminate home-plate collisions
Managers, GMs also briefed on proposed changes for instant replay
http://tinyurl.com/kc3amtk
By Paul Hagen / MLB.com | 12/11/2013 7:13 P.M. ET
LAKE BUENA VISTA, Fla. -- A busy day of meetings that will result in
significant differences in the way baseball games will be governed on the
field was capped off Wednesday with an announcement that the Playing Rules
Committee has voted overwhelmingly to outlaw home-plate collisions between
runners and catchers.
That followed a morning meeting at which managers and general managers were
briefed on the proposal for expanded instant replay, which could end up
looking much different from what was being discussed just weeks ago at the
last Owners Meetings.
The decision to eliminate collisions didn't become a serious topic of
conversation until last month at the General Managers Meetings, but the idea
quickly caught fire. Managers Mike Matheny of the Cardinals and Bruce Bochy
of the Giants, both former catchers, led the push. Both spoke on the subject
and others in attendance were asked for their input before the measure was
passed.
The exact language of the new rule has not been written. The final draft will
be approved by the Rules Committee and then submitted for a vote at the next
quarterly Owners Meetings in January. Finally, it must be approved by the
Major League Baseball Players Association. Mets general manager Sandy
Alderson, chairman of the committee, is confident all that can be
accomplished before the 2014 season opens.
The primary consideration is player safety.
"This is, I think, in answer to a few issues that have arisen," Alderson said
on the last full day of the annual Winter Meetings. "One is just the general
occurrence of injuries from these incidents that affected players, both
runners and catchers. And also kind of the general concern about concussions
that exists not only in baseball but throughout professional sports and
amateur sports today. It's an emerging issue, and one that we in baseball
have to address as well as other sports. So that's part of the impetus for
this rule change as well."
Alderson admitted that drafting language that will be practical and effective
won't be a simple task.
"There are college and high school rules currently that address this issue,"
Alderson said. "It has to do with a number of different things: Positioning,
intent, a variety of things that we are going to look at. Umpires will have
some discretion, but at the same time, umpires have other things to do,
deciding whether the run scores or doesn't score.
"So it's a little more complicated than it would appear," he said. "But I
think ultimately what we want to do is change the culture of acceptance that
these plays are ordinary and routine and an accepted part of the game, that
the risks and individual risks, the costs associated in terms of health and
injury just no longer warrant the status quo.
"So the actual detail, frankly the kinds of plays that we're trying to
eliminate, we haven't finally determined. But what I would expect is to put
together 100 of these plays and identify which ones we want to continue to
allow and others that we want to prohibit and draft a rule accordingly."
Enforcement will be two-fold. A runner who is deemed to have intentionally
run over the catcher may be called out, for example, even if he touches the
plate without being tagged. There can also be further penalties in terms of
fines and ejections.
The owners are also expected to vote on expanded replay, including a manager
challenge system, in January after approving funding for the program in
November. But after the briefing, several managers indicated that what they
were told was far different from what was being discussed at the GM Meetings.
"It's changing every day," one manager said.
MLB executive vice president for baseball operations Joe Torre, however,
downplayed that angle.
"The fact of the matter is we still have [to receive approval from the MLBPA
and umpires union], so there is really nothing that is in stone at this point
in time," Torre said. "But I thought it was a good opportunity to give the
managers a little head's up, and especially the fact that the next time we
see them it will be Spring Training, just give them something to think about,
and to let them call us with any questions or suggestions.
"So it certainly wasn't a meeting where we said, 'This is the way it's going
to be,' Torre said. "It was basically, 'This is where we are right now,' and
I really don't want to go into it only because it may not be the same thing
we start the season with. We have a pretty good idea of where we want to be,
but, again, we still have to wait for the unions to sign off."
As recently as last month, Torre was talking about ways to keep managers from
stalling to allow a coach or press box employee to look at replays and give a
signal whether or not he should appeal. Multiple managers were under the
impression Wednesday, however, that not only would they be allowed to get
electronic help, but that they had been told it would be available within 10
seconds and that each ballpark would have equal access to a monitor from
either dugout.
Asked specifically about that point, Torre didn't deny it, but added: "It's
just that we've talked about a lot of stuff. The one thing in this process
that our goal is to make everything uniform for all the teams. So you have a
road team and a home team, we are making sure that that home team is not
going to have an advantage over the road team. ... We plan on having the
technology standardized for everybody."
The managers were also under the impression that they would be given just one
challenge per game, but would get another if their first was upheld.
"Umpires are my responsibility," Torre said. "I'd like to see no challenges
through the course of the ballgame. We have to be realistic, but the fewer,
the better. Right now, I think our take on it is we've missed like one call
every 5.7 or 5.8 games. The fact is that there is nothing insignificant about
any play that happens during the course of a game, because it can turn into
something big.
"We just sort of planted some seeds today on some of our thinking, on how
we're thinking," Torre said. "As far as how many challenges, you know, the
fewer the better for me. Because it is probably easier to increase later as
opposed to pulling back, because the game would suffer if I think we've had
too many of those."
One thing that remains unchanged is that the replays will be viewed and a
decision made at MLB Advanced Media headquarters in New York.
From the beginning, Torre has been mindful of how all of this will impact the
pace of play.
"The game is the most important thing," Torre said. "I know we have
technology. We can't ignore it. But we certainly don't want to affect the
rhythm of the game. Our sport is a little different than other sports. We
don't have the built-in timeouts that other sports have where they can do
stuff. And we're trying to make sense of what we can do without interfering,
and what is important for us."
Torre remains confident that expanded replay, which was tested in the Arizona
Fall League, can be implemented in time for the upcoming season despite the
numbers of wrinkles that still need to be ironed out.
"I think it can come together very quickly," Torre said. "We're certainly not
going to force something if we're not ready to do it the right way. We're
pretty confident we can do it with the six or seven weeks of Spring Training,
and that will be our practice ground both in Florida and Arizona. I think
we'll be in pretty good shape by that time. But they're just loose ends not
tied up. It's not like we're all over the place."
--
抱歉文長,原諒我英文不好恕不翻譯,中譯資訊請板友們另行 google
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.116.85.189
→
12/12 11:45, , 1F
12/12 11:45, 1F
※ 編輯: blackcellar 來自: 140.116.85.189 (12/12 11:46)
推
12/12 11:46, , 2F
12/12 11:46, 2F
→
12/12 11:47, , 3F
12/12 11:47, 3F
→
12/12 11:48, , 4F
12/12 11:48, 4F
→
12/12 11:48, , 5F
12/12 11:48, 5F
→
12/12 11:49, , 6F
12/12 11:49, 6F
推
12/12 11:54, , 7F
12/12 11:54, 7F
→
12/12 11:54, , 8F
12/12 11:54, 8F
→
12/12 11:55, , 9F
12/12 11:55, 9F
推
12/12 11:55, , 10F
12/12 11:55, 10F
推
12/12 12:05, , 11F
12/12 12:05, 11F
推
12/12 13:21, , 12F
12/12 13:21, 12F
推
12/12 13:23, , 13F
12/12 13:23, 13F
推
12/12 13:23, , 14F
12/12 13:23, 14F
推
12/12 13:40, , 15F
12/12 13:40, 15F
推
12/12 14:53, , 16F
12/12 14:53, 16F
推
12/12 15:30, , 17F
12/12 15:30, 17F
→
12/12 15:30, , 18F
12/12 15:30, 18F
→
12/12 15:30, , 19F
12/12 15:30, 19F
推
12/12 15:33, , 20F
12/12 15:33, 20F
推
12/12 15:51, , 21F
12/12 15:51, 21F
推
12/12 16:36, , 22F
12/12 16:36, 22F
→
12/12 21:24, , 23F
12/12 21:24, 23F
推
12/12 23:05, , 24F
12/12 23:05, 24F
推
12/13 06:56, , 25F
12/13 06:56, 25F